A Cross-Community Comparison of Antecedents of Hurricane Ian Risk Perceptions and Evacuation Behaviours

IF 2.2 3区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1111/1468-5973.70009
Xiaochen Angela Zhang, Jonathan Borden
{"title":"A Cross-Community Comparison of Antecedents of Hurricane Ian Risk Perceptions and Evacuation Behaviours","authors":"Xiaochen Angela Zhang,&nbsp;Jonathan Borden","doi":"10.1111/1468-5973.70009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study seeks to understand how historical models of risk perception and protective action antecedents, as predicted by The Protective Action Decision Model (PADM), apply across micro-regional differences in the context of Florida counties during the 2022 Hurricane Ian, and how these regional differences may lead to differences in reception, perception and response to information and evacuation warnings across the state. Two Florida communities (Southwest vs. Central and Eastern regions) with different typography, historical disaster experience, demographics and existing hazard adjustment programs were surveyed and compared. Results showed that, within the same hurricane event and broader geographic region (Florida), the two community locations differ in their reliance on information sources, social cues and prior hurricane experiences to inform risk perceptions and evacuation decisions. Additionally, different mediation patterns of risk perceptions were found between the antecedents and evacuation behaviours for the different community locations. The findings imply the importance to consider regional variations and to strategize messaging communicating risk and self-protective behaviours accordingly.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management","volume":"32 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-5973.70009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study seeks to understand how historical models of risk perception and protective action antecedents, as predicted by The Protective Action Decision Model (PADM), apply across micro-regional differences in the context of Florida counties during the 2022 Hurricane Ian, and how these regional differences may lead to differences in reception, perception and response to information and evacuation warnings across the state. Two Florida communities (Southwest vs. Central and Eastern regions) with different typography, historical disaster experience, demographics and existing hazard adjustment programs were surveyed and compared. Results showed that, within the same hurricane event and broader geographic region (Florida), the two community locations differ in their reliance on information sources, social cues and prior hurricane experiences to inform risk perceptions and evacuation decisions. Additionally, different mediation patterns of risk perceptions were found between the antecedents and evacuation behaviours for the different community locations. The findings imply the importance to consider regional variations and to strategize messaging communicating risk and self-protective behaviours accordingly.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
飓风伊恩风险认知和撤离行为的跨社区前因比较
本研究旨在了解保护行动决策模型(PADM)预测的风险感知和保护行动前因的历史模型如何在2022年飓风伊恩期间在佛罗里达州各县的微观区域差异中应用,以及这些区域差异如何导致全州对信息和疏散警告的接收、感知和响应差异。佛罗里达州的两个社区(西南部与中部和东部地区)具有不同的排版,历史灾害经验,人口统计和现有的灾害调整计划进行了调查和比较。结果表明,在同一飓风事件和更广泛的地理区域(佛罗里达州)内,两个社区的位置在依赖信息来源、社会线索和先前的飓风经验来告知风险认知和疏散决策方面存在差异。此外,在不同的社区地点,风险感知与疏散行为之间存在不同的中介模式。研究结果表明,必须考虑地区差异,并相应地制定信息、沟通风险和自我保护行为的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
12.90%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management is an invaluable source of information on all aspects of contingency planning, scenario analysis and crisis management in both corporate and public sectors. It focuses on the opportunities and threats facing organizations and presents analysis and case studies of crisis prevention, crisis planning, recovery and turnaround management. With contributions from world-wide sources including corporations, governmental agencies, think tanks and influential academics, this publication provides a vital platform for the exchange of strategic and operational experience, information and knowledge.
期刊最新文献
The Double-Edged Role of Institutional Trust in Crisis Management: From Protective Mechanism to Risk Amplifier Experts' Opinion on Decontamination and Antidote Strategies: Complementing Contemporary Expert Consensus and Evidence to Optimize Preparedness and Response to CBRN Threats in the Middle East and North Africa Evaluation of Disaster Awareness Perception Level in Relation to Socio-Demographic Factors of Public Food Service Staff: A Catering Example Disaster Preparedness in Urban Pediatric Hospitals: A Study of Healthcare Workers' Attitudes Toward Emergency Evacuation Beyond Political and Managerial Goals: Unintended Consequences of Government Crisis Communication Strategies-Evidence From Citizen Voice Behavior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1