Why We Need Desirable Properties in Pairwise Comparison Methods?

IF 1.9 Q3 MANAGEMENT Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1002/mcda.70002
Radomír Perzina, Jaroslav Ramík
{"title":"Why We Need Desirable Properties in Pairwise Comparison Methods?","authors":"Radomír Perzina,&nbsp;Jaroslav Ramík","doi":"10.1002/mcda.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Pairwise comparison matrices (PCMs) are inevitable tools in some important multiple-criteria decision-making methods, for example AHP/ANP, TOPSIS, PROMETHEE and others. In this paper, we investigate some important properties of PCMs which influence the generated priority vectors for the final ranking of the given alternatives. The main subproblem of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is to calculate the priority vectors, that is, the weights assigned to the elements of the hierarchy (criteria, sub-criteria, and/or alternatives or variants), by using the information provided in the form of a pairwise comparison matrix. Given a set of elements, and a corresponding pairwise comparison matrix, whose entries evaluate the relative importance of the elements with respect to a given criterion, the final ranking of the given alternatives is evaluated. We investigate some important and natural properties of PCMs called the desirable properties, particularly, the non-dominance, consistency, intensity and coherence, which influence the generated priority vectors. Usually, the priority vector is calculated based on some well-known method, for example, the Eigenvector Method, the Arithmetic Mean Method, the Geometric Mean Method, the Least Square Method, and so forth. The novelty of our approach is that the priority vector is calculated as the solution of an optimization problem where an error objective function is minimised with respect to constraints given by the desirable properties. The properties of the optimal solution are discussed and some illustrating examples are presented. The corresponding software tool has been developed and demonstrated in some examples.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":45876,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","volume":"31 5-6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mcda.70002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pairwise comparison matrices (PCMs) are inevitable tools in some important multiple-criteria decision-making methods, for example AHP/ANP, TOPSIS, PROMETHEE and others. In this paper, we investigate some important properties of PCMs which influence the generated priority vectors for the final ranking of the given alternatives. The main subproblem of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is to calculate the priority vectors, that is, the weights assigned to the elements of the hierarchy (criteria, sub-criteria, and/or alternatives or variants), by using the information provided in the form of a pairwise comparison matrix. Given a set of elements, and a corresponding pairwise comparison matrix, whose entries evaluate the relative importance of the elements with respect to a given criterion, the final ranking of the given alternatives is evaluated. We investigate some important and natural properties of PCMs called the desirable properties, particularly, the non-dominance, consistency, intensity and coherence, which influence the generated priority vectors. Usually, the priority vector is calculated based on some well-known method, for example, the Eigenvector Method, the Arithmetic Mean Method, the Geometric Mean Method, the Least Square Method, and so forth. The novelty of our approach is that the priority vector is calculated as the solution of an optimization problem where an error objective function is minimised with respect to constraints given by the desirable properties. The properties of the optimal solution are discussed and some illustrating examples are presented. The corresponding software tool has been developed and demonstrated in some examples.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么两两比较方法需要理想的性质?
在AHP/ANP、TOPSIS、PROMETHEE等重要的多准则决策方法中,配对比较矩阵是不可避免的工具。在本文中,我们研究了pcm的一些重要性质,这些性质会影响生成的优先向量对给定方案的最终排序。层次分析法(AHP)的主要子问题是计算优先级向量,即通过使用以两两比较矩阵形式提供的信息,分配给层次结构元素(标准、子标准和/或备选或变体)的权重。给定一组元素和相应的两两比较矩阵,其条目根据给定标准评估元素的相对重要性,从而评估给定备选方案的最终排名。我们研究了pcm的一些重要的自然性质,称为理想性质,特别是影响生成的优先向量的非显性、一致性、强度和相干性。通常,优先向量的计算是基于一些众所周知的方法,如特征向量法、算术平均数法、几何平均数法、最小二乘法等。我们方法的新颖之处在于,优先向量是作为优化问题的解来计算的,其中误差目标函数相对于由期望属性给出的约束最小化。讨论了最优解的性质,并给出了一些实例。开发了相应的软件工具,并通过实例进行了验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis was launched in 1992, and from the outset has aimed to be the repository of choice for papers covering all aspects of MCDA/MCDM. The journal provides an international forum for the presentation and discussion of all aspects of research, application and evaluation of multi-criteria decision analysis, and publishes material from a variety of disciplines and all schools of thought. Papers addressing mathematical, theoretical, and behavioural aspects are welcome, as are case studies, applications and evaluation of techniques and methodologies.
期刊最新文献
Efficiency Criteria for Multicost Variational Models Driven by H-Type I Functionals Why We Need Desirable Properties in Pairwise Comparison Methods? An Analytical Framework for the Multiplicative Best-Worst Method A Multi-Objective Optimization for Determination of Sustainable Crop Pattern Using Game Theory A Multi-Criteria Decision Support Tool for Shared Decision Making in Clinical Consultation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1