Hydrodynamics and Aquatic Vegetation Drive Spatial Patterns of Environmental DNA in Ponds

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Environmental DNA Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1002/edn3.70036
Sandra R. Mayne, Jeffrey A. Manning, Stephen M. Henderson, Meghan B. Parsley, Katherine M. Strickler, Jeffrey R. Nielson, Caren S. Goldberg
{"title":"Hydrodynamics and Aquatic Vegetation Drive Spatial Patterns of Environmental DNA in Ponds","authors":"Sandra R. Mayne,&nbsp;Jeffrey A. Manning,&nbsp;Stephen M. Henderson,&nbsp;Meghan B. Parsley,&nbsp;Katherine M. Strickler,&nbsp;Jeffrey R. Nielson,&nbsp;Caren S. Goldberg","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling is a powerful method for detecting aquatic species at low densities. However, eDNA may remain close to the source in lentic systems, decreasing the effectiveness of eDNA surveys. We conducted cage experiments with salamanders and simultaneous detailed hydrologic and wind measurements to investigate the influence of the physical environment on detection patterns of eDNA in ponds. We found much higher detection rates in the surface layer than at depth, and that aquatic vegetation reduced detection of eDNA produced in open water by 80%–94%. Within the surface mixed layer, detection rates were highest close to the source in the direction of water flow in the bottom half of the layer, and detections farthest from the source occurred when velocities in this sublayer were high. Detections were near zero even close to the source when this sublayer was flowing fast and away from the sampling point. The direction of water flow in this lower half of the surface mixed layer was negatively correlated with wind direction for most of the study. These spatial and temporal dynamics indicate that eDNA transport processes in ponds are highly complex. Sampling away from aquatic vegetation, in the surface mixed layer, and upwind of potential sources, in addition to sampling at many locations within a pond and considering temporal patterns, may improve detection of rare pond species. This work contributes to a growing body of literature characterizing the variability of eDNA detection in lentic systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"6 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70036","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling is a powerful method for detecting aquatic species at low densities. However, eDNA may remain close to the source in lentic systems, decreasing the effectiveness of eDNA surveys. We conducted cage experiments with salamanders and simultaneous detailed hydrologic and wind measurements to investigate the influence of the physical environment on detection patterns of eDNA in ponds. We found much higher detection rates in the surface layer than at depth, and that aquatic vegetation reduced detection of eDNA produced in open water by 80%–94%. Within the surface mixed layer, detection rates were highest close to the source in the direction of water flow in the bottom half of the layer, and detections farthest from the source occurred when velocities in this sublayer were high. Detections were near zero even close to the source when this sublayer was flowing fast and away from the sampling point. The direction of water flow in this lower half of the surface mixed layer was negatively correlated with wind direction for most of the study. These spatial and temporal dynamics indicate that eDNA transport processes in ponds are highly complex. Sampling away from aquatic vegetation, in the surface mixed layer, and upwind of potential sources, in addition to sampling at many locations within a pond and considering temporal patterns, may improve detection of rare pond species. This work contributes to a growing body of literature characterizing the variability of eDNA detection in lentic systems.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
水动力和水生植被驱动池塘环境DNA的空间格局
环境DNA (eDNA)取样是一种检测低密度水生物种的有效方法。然而,在活体系统中,eDNA可能仍然接近源,从而降低了eDNA调查的有效性。我们对蝾螈进行了笼子实验,同时进行了详细的水文和风测量,以研究物理环境对池塘中eDNA检测模式的影响。我们发现在表层的检出率比在深层的检出率高得多,并且水生植被将开阔水域产生的eDNA的检出率降低了80%-94%。在地表混合层内,靠近源的下半层水流方向检出率最高,离源最远的探测发生在该亚层流速高的时候。当该子层快速流动并远离采样点时,即使在靠近源处,检测结果也接近于零。在大部分研究中,地表混合层下半部分水流方向与风向呈负相关。这些时空动态表明,eDNA在池塘中的转运过程是高度复杂的。在远离水生植被、表层混合层和潜在来源的逆风处采样,以及在池塘内的许多地点采样并考虑时间模式,可以提高对稀有池塘物种的检测。这项工作有助于越来越多的文献描述生物系统中eDNA检测的可变性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Issue Information A Framework to Unify the Relationship Between Numerical Abundance, Biomass, and Environmental DNA Invasive Crayfish: Drivers or Passengers of Degradation in Freshwater Ecosystems? Evaluation of Environmental DNA as a Surveillance Tool for Invasive House Mice (Mus musculus) Optimizing eDNA Metabarcoding Techniques for Assessing Arthropod Communities in Tree-Related Microhabitats
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1