N. P. K. Muhandiram, M. W. Humphreys, R. Fychan, J. W. Davies, M. B. Scott, J. Harper, A. Thomas, H. Powell, R. Sanderson, C. L. Marley
{"title":"Scoping Opportunities for Nitrogen Use Efficiency Among Productive Agricultural Forage Grasses With Diverse Rooting Systems","authors":"N. P. K. Muhandiram, M. W. Humphreys, R. Fychan, J. W. Davies, M. B. Scott, J. Harper, A. Thomas, H. Powell, R. Sanderson, C. L. Marley","doi":"10.1002/fes3.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>For forage production to be efficient and environmentally sustainable, the extent and timing of nitrogen fertiliser applications should match the uptake and growth capabilities of a grass crop. A two-year field experiment, comprising four diverse grass cultivars, was conducted to assess the impact of two contrasting N-application rates on forage and root biomass (RB) production and nitrogen-use-efficiencies (NUEs). Replicated field plots of perennial ryegrass, tall fescue and two <i>Festulolium</i> (ryegrass × fescue hybrid) cultivars were compared at Low N (LN) 178 and High N (HN) 356 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> over 2 years. HN applications increased dry matter yield (DMY) in Year 1 (<i>p</i> < 0.05) but not in Year 2. Ryegrass outyielded all in Year 1 but in Year 2, fescue had the highest DMY at HN (<i>p</i> < 0.05), but cultivars did not differ in yield at LN. <i>Festulolium</i> yields were consistently intermediate. Root biomass at LN in Yr1 was highest in the <i>Festulolium</i> (<i>Lolium perenne</i> × <i>Festuca arundinacea var glaucescens</i>) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). For all grasses, and in both years, mean RB and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and nitrogen utilisation efficiency (NutE) were higher under LN, than HN. Nitrogen uptake efficiency (NupE) was similar in all grasses in Year 1, irrespective of N treatment, but in Year 2, excepting tall fescue, was greater in grasses grown under LN. Increasing RB correlated (<i>p</i> < 0.05) with improved NUE and NutE, but no association was evident for NupE. Grass cultivars differed in their response to nitrogen applications. Whilst relative forage production of ryegrass and fescue contrasted over the 2 years, forage yields of <i>Festulolium</i> cultivars were more consistent. In conclusion, HN application depressed NUE by productive grass cultivars and correlations between RB and NUEs may indicate opportunities to help tailor grass cultivar/fertiliser combinations and achieve sustainable forage and root production.</p>","PeriodicalId":54283,"journal":{"name":"Food and Energy Security","volume":"13 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fes3.70023","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Energy Security","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fes3.70023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
For forage production to be efficient and environmentally sustainable, the extent and timing of nitrogen fertiliser applications should match the uptake and growth capabilities of a grass crop. A two-year field experiment, comprising four diverse grass cultivars, was conducted to assess the impact of two contrasting N-application rates on forage and root biomass (RB) production and nitrogen-use-efficiencies (NUEs). Replicated field plots of perennial ryegrass, tall fescue and two Festulolium (ryegrass × fescue hybrid) cultivars were compared at Low N (LN) 178 and High N (HN) 356 kg ha−1 over 2 years. HN applications increased dry matter yield (DMY) in Year 1 (p < 0.05) but not in Year 2. Ryegrass outyielded all in Year 1 but in Year 2, fescue had the highest DMY at HN (p < 0.05), but cultivars did not differ in yield at LN. Festulolium yields were consistently intermediate. Root biomass at LN in Yr1 was highest in the Festulolium (Lolium perenne × Festuca arundinacea var glaucescens) (p < 0.05). For all grasses, and in both years, mean RB and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and nitrogen utilisation efficiency (NutE) were higher under LN, than HN. Nitrogen uptake efficiency (NupE) was similar in all grasses in Year 1, irrespective of N treatment, but in Year 2, excepting tall fescue, was greater in grasses grown under LN. Increasing RB correlated (p < 0.05) with improved NUE and NutE, but no association was evident for NupE. Grass cultivars differed in their response to nitrogen applications. Whilst relative forage production of ryegrass and fescue contrasted over the 2 years, forage yields of Festulolium cultivars were more consistent. In conclusion, HN application depressed NUE by productive grass cultivars and correlations between RB and NUEs may indicate opportunities to help tailor grass cultivar/fertiliser combinations and achieve sustainable forage and root production.
期刊介绍:
Food and Energy Security seeks to publish high quality and high impact original research on agricultural crop and forest productivity to improve food and energy security. It actively seeks submissions from emerging countries with expanding agricultural research communities. Papers from China, other parts of Asia, India and South America are particularly welcome. The Editorial Board, headed by Editor-in-Chief Professor Martin Parry, is determined to make FES the leading publication in its sector and will be aiming for a top-ranking impact factor.
Primary research articles should report hypothesis driven investigations that provide new insights into mechanisms and processes that determine productivity and properties for exploitation. Review articles are welcome but they must be critical in approach and provide particularly novel and far reaching insights.
Food and Energy Security offers authors a forum for the discussion of the most important advances in this field and promotes an integrative approach of scientific disciplines. Papers must contribute substantially to the advancement of knowledge.
Examples of areas covered in Food and Energy Security include:
• Agronomy
• Biotechnological Approaches
• Breeding & Genetics
• Climate Change
• Quality and Composition
• Food Crops and Bioenergy Feedstocks
• Developmental, Physiology and Biochemistry
• Functional Genomics
• Molecular Biology
• Pest and Disease Management
• Post Harvest Biology
• Soil Science
• Systems Biology