Refining the methodology for verifying GLP studies submitted within an application for regulated products

T. Coja, A Charistou, S. Anagnos, C. Anagnostopoulos, N. Arapaki, R. Bauer, D. Bournele, S. Galazka, P. Gatos, D. Hofstädter, I. Kandris, E. Karanasios, M. Kuffner, K. Machera, K. Marchart, U. Mayerhofer, S. Mirmigkou, I. Moschou, V. Plichta, E. Rauscher-Gabernig, J. Steinwider, W. Stepanek, H. Sun, E. Tzanetou, K. Vejdovszky, E. Vogiatzi, A. Weninger, M. Wögerbauer
{"title":"Refining the methodology for verifying GLP studies submitted within an application for regulated products","authors":"T. Coja,&nbsp;A Charistou,&nbsp;S. Anagnos,&nbsp;C. Anagnostopoulos,&nbsp;N. Arapaki,&nbsp;R. Bauer,&nbsp;D. Bournele,&nbsp;S. Galazka,&nbsp;P. Gatos,&nbsp;D. Hofstädter,&nbsp;I. Kandris,&nbsp;E. Karanasios,&nbsp;M. Kuffner,&nbsp;K. Machera,&nbsp;K. Marchart,&nbsp;U. Mayerhofer,&nbsp;S. Mirmigkou,&nbsp;I. Moschou,&nbsp;V. Plichta,&nbsp;E. Rauscher-Gabernig,&nbsp;J. Steinwider,&nbsp;W. Stepanek,&nbsp;H. Sun,&nbsp;E. Tzanetou,&nbsp;K. Vejdovszky,&nbsp;E. Vogiatzi,&nbsp;A. Weninger,&nbsp;M. Wögerbauer","doi":"10.2903/sp.efsa.2024.EN-9004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>OECD Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) principles were developed by governments as a regulatory control mechanism to ensure that safety studies would be of acceptable quality and integrity. EU Directives 2004/09/EC and 2004/10/EC incorporate the OECD GLP principles into the EU regulatory framework, requiring that studies submitted for the assessment and authorization adhere to the principles of GLP. In its role as European risk assessor authority, EFSA launched a project to strengthen the methodology for verifying GLP studies for all regulated product areas under its remit, with three main objectives: to establish verification methodology and tools through a fit for purpose GLP verification checklist, to test the methodology by applying it to substantial amount of studies across different regulatory areas and different study types and to develop a hands-on training program for GLP assessors and scientific units/risk assessors for the use and understanding of the created GLP checklist. Following these objectives, the study evaluation had two levels of assessment: identification of GLP observations and assessing scientific reliability of studies where GLP observations were made. Around 1,000 studies were investigated to examine the developed methodology. The GLP verification checklist proved to be fit for purpose for verifying GLP studies. Hands-on training was made available on the EU academy platform (https://academy.europa.eu/).</p>","PeriodicalId":100395,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Supporting Publications","volume":"21 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/sp.efsa.2024.EN-9004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFSA Supporting Publications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/sp.efsa.2024.EN-9004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OECD Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) principles were developed by governments as a regulatory control mechanism to ensure that safety studies would be of acceptable quality and integrity. EU Directives 2004/09/EC and 2004/10/EC incorporate the OECD GLP principles into the EU regulatory framework, requiring that studies submitted for the assessment and authorization adhere to the principles of GLP. In its role as European risk assessor authority, EFSA launched a project to strengthen the methodology for verifying GLP studies for all regulated product areas under its remit, with three main objectives: to establish verification methodology and tools through a fit for purpose GLP verification checklist, to test the methodology by applying it to substantial amount of studies across different regulatory areas and different study types and to develop a hands-on training program for GLP assessors and scientific units/risk assessors for the use and understanding of the created GLP checklist. Following these objectives, the study evaluation had two levels of assessment: identification of GLP observations and assessing scientific reliability of studies where GLP observations were made. Around 1,000 studies were investigated to examine the developed methodology. The GLP verification checklist proved to be fit for purpose for verifying GLP studies. Hands-on training was made available on the EU academy platform (https://academy.europa.eu/).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改进了验证在管制产品申请中提交的GLP研究的方法
经合组织良好实验室规范(GLP)原则是由各国政府制定的,作为一种监管控制机制,以确保安全性研究具有可接受的质量和完整性。欧盟指令2004/09/EC和2004/10/EC将经合组织GLP原则纳入欧盟监管框架,要求提交评估和授权的研究遵守GLP原则。作为欧洲风险评估机构,欧洲食品安全局启动了一个项目,以加强核实其职权范围内所有受管制产品领域的GLP研究的方法,主要目标有三个:通过适合目的的GLP验证清单建立验证方法和工具,通过将其应用于不同监管领域和不同研究类型的大量研究来测试该方法,并为GLP评估人员和科学单位/风险评估人员开发实践培训计划,以使用和理解所创建的GLP检查清单。遵循这些目标,研究评估有两个级别的评估:GLP观测的识别和评估GLP观测研究的科学可靠性。研究人员调查了大约1,000项研究,以检验所开发的方法。GLP验证检查表被证明适合验证GLP研究的目的。在欧盟学院平台(https://academy.europa.eu/)上提供了实践培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Novel foods Risk Assessment Data Modelling and Extraction (NORA) — final report Administrative guidance for the preparation of notifications and applications on traditional foods from third countries in the context of Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 Technical Report on the notification of roasted seeds of Dipteryx alata Vogel as a traditional food from a third country pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 Arrhenodes minutus Pest Report to support the ranking of EU candidate priority pests Polygraphus proximus Pest Report to support the ranking of EU candidate priority pests
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1