The nitrogen value of cover crops: How much N can cover crops replace?

IF 2.3 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agricultural & Environmental Letters Pub Date : 2024-12-15 DOI:10.1002/ael2.70006
Guillermo S. Marcillo, Resham Thapa, Steven B. Mirsky, Nicolas Martin
{"title":"The nitrogen value of cover crops: How much N can cover crops replace?","authors":"Guillermo S. Marcillo,&nbsp;Resham Thapa,&nbsp;Steven B. Mirsky,&nbsp;Nicolas Martin","doi":"10.1002/ael2.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n \n <p>Achieving high corn yields while reducing fertilizer losses seems attainable through nitrogen (N) management decisions that include the use of cover crops (CCs). To determine whether CCs result in a net positive balance between N fertilization and crop utilization, we used US field trial data comparing corn systems with and without CCs, and estimated the amount of N fertilizer that CCs would replace and lead to equivalent grain yields under both systems. Overall, applying lower nitrogen rates to corn without cover crops resulted in similar or higher yields when legumes were used as cover crops (indicating positive nitrogen replacement in the amount of 62 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>), but lower yields when grasses were used as cover crops (indicating negative nitrogen replacement in the amount of 24 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>). Our results illustrate the benefits and trade-offs of integrating single CC species into a corn system, that is, reducing N inputs with legume CCs or supplementing N fertilizer to avoid possible grain yield penalties in the case of grass CCs. Quantifying the N replacement value of CCs would facilitate field-level recommendations and policy regulations aimed at promoting sustainable corn production in the United States.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Core Ideas</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Managing N fertilizer rates is essential for maximizing the benefits of legume and grass cover crops in corn-based systems.</li>\n \n <li>N fertilizer replacement of grass and legume cover crops was assessed based on data from field experiments in the United States.</li>\n \n <li>Legume cover crops were found to positively replace N fertilizer; potentially reducing corn N inputs.</li>\n \n <li>Grass cover crops were found to negatively replace N fertilizer; potentially requiring supplementary fertilizer to reduce corn yield penalties.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.70006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ael2.70006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Achieving high corn yields while reducing fertilizer losses seems attainable through nitrogen (N) management decisions that include the use of cover crops (CCs). To determine whether CCs result in a net positive balance between N fertilization and crop utilization, we used US field trial data comparing corn systems with and without CCs, and estimated the amount of N fertilizer that CCs would replace and lead to equivalent grain yields under both systems. Overall, applying lower nitrogen rates to corn without cover crops resulted in similar or higher yields when legumes were used as cover crops (indicating positive nitrogen replacement in the amount of 62 kg ha−1), but lower yields when grasses were used as cover crops (indicating negative nitrogen replacement in the amount of 24 kg ha−1). Our results illustrate the benefits and trade-offs of integrating single CC species into a corn system, that is, reducing N inputs with legume CCs or supplementing N fertilizer to avoid possible grain yield penalties in the case of grass CCs. Quantifying the N replacement value of CCs would facilitate field-level recommendations and policy regulations aimed at promoting sustainable corn production in the United States.

Core Ideas

  • Managing N fertilizer rates is essential for maximizing the benefits of legume and grass cover crops in corn-based systems.
  • N fertilizer replacement of grass and legume cover crops was assessed based on data from field experiments in the United States.
  • Legume cover crops were found to positively replace N fertilizer; potentially reducing corn N inputs.
  • Grass cover crops were found to negatively replace N fertilizer; potentially requiring supplementary fertilizer to reduce corn yield penalties.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
覆盖作物的氮值:覆盖作物能替代多少氮?
通过包括使用覆盖作物在内的氮管理决策,在减少肥料损失的同时实现玉米高产似乎是可以实现的。为了确定CCs是否会导致氮肥和作物利用之间的净正平衡,我们使用了美国的田间试验数据,比较了有和没有CCs的玉米系统,并估计了在两种系统下CCs将取代的氮肥量,并导致相同的粮食产量。总的来说,在没有覆盖作物的玉米上施用较低的氮肥,当豆类作为覆盖作物时(表明正氮替代量为62 kg ha - 1),产量相似或更高,但当草作为覆盖作物时(表明负氮替代量为24 kg ha - 1)产量较低。我们的研究结果说明了将单一CC物种整合到玉米系统中的好处和权衡,即减少豆科CC的N输入或补充氮肥以避免在草类CC的情况下可能的粮食产量损失。量化碳储备的氮替代价值将有助于在美国提出旨在促进可持续玉米生产的田间建议和政策法规。在以玉米为基础的系统中,管理氮肥水平对于最大限度地提高豆科和禾本科作物的效益至关重要。以美国大田试验数据为基础,对牧草和豆科覆盖作物的氮肥替代进行了评价。豆科覆盖作物对氮肥有正向替代作用;可能会减少玉米氮的投入。禾草覆盖作物负替代氮肥;可能需要补充肥料来减少玉米产量的损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Machine learning on multi-spectral imagery to estimate nutrient yield of mixed-species cover crops Issue Information Impact of gypsum applications and cover crop on soybean (Glycine max) elemental composition Drawdown of soil phosphorus by crop removal: A meta-analysis of 56 fields with interrupted fertilization The nitrogen value of cover crops: How much N can cover crops replace?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1