首页 > 最新文献

Agricultural & Environmental Letters最新文献

英文 中文
The influence of climate on varietal similarities across countries 气候对各国品种相似性的影响
IF 2.3 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-10-26 DOI: 10.1002/ael2.70001
Germán Puga, Kym Anderson

In recent decades, vignerons have focused more on the world's mainstream varieties than on differentiating their varietal mix. This has led countries to become more similar to each other in their mix of winegrape varieties and more varietally concentrated. What are the drivers of those changes? In this study, we focus on one of those drivers, that is, climate similarities. We estimate statistical models to quantify the potential influence of 16 climate variables on varietal similarities across countries, as well as on how their varietal mixes have become more or less similar since 2000. The results indicate not only that countries with more similar climates have more similar varietal mixes but also that in recent years countries with more similar climates have become even more similar in their mixes. This, however, does not necessarily mean that vignerons have been planting the varieties that are better adapted to their climates.

Core Ideas

  • Wine-producing countries have become more similar and concentrated in their mix of winegrape varieties.
  • This similarity extends particularly among countries sharing similar climatic conditions.
  • In recent years, countries with similar climates have continued to converge in their winegrape varietal mixes.
  • Nevertheless, vignerons have not necessarily been planting varieties that are better suited to their climates.
近几十年来,葡萄种植者更多关注世界主流品种,而不是品种组合的差异化。这导致各国的葡萄品种组合越来越相似,品种越来越集中。这些变化的驱动因素是什么?在本研究中,我们将重点关注其中一个驱动因素,即气候相似性。我们估算了统计模型,以量化 16 个气候变量对各国葡萄品种相似性的潜在影响,以及自 2000 年以来各国葡萄品种组合的相似程度。结果表明,不仅气候较为相似的国家的品种组合较为相似,而且近年来气候较为相似的国家的品种组合变得更加相似。然而,这并不一定意味着葡萄种植者一直在种植更适应其气候的品种。 核心观点 葡萄酒生产国的葡萄品种组合变得更加相似和集中。 这种相似性尤其体现在气候条件相似的国家之间。 近年来,气候条件相似的国家在葡萄品种组合方面不断趋同。 然而,葡萄种植者并不一定种植更适合其气候条件的葡萄品种。
{"title":"The influence of climate on varietal similarities across countries","authors":"Germán Puga,&nbsp;Kym Anderson","doi":"10.1002/ael2.70001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ael2.70001","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <p>In recent decades, vignerons have focused more on the world's mainstream varieties than on differentiating their varietal mix. This has led countries to become more similar to each other in their mix of winegrape varieties and more varietally concentrated. What are the drivers of those changes? In this study, we focus on one of those drivers, that is, climate similarities. We estimate statistical models to quantify the potential influence of 16 climate variables on varietal similarities across countries, as well as on how their varietal mixes have become more or less similar since 2000. The results indicate not only that countries with more similar climates have more similar varietal mixes but also that in recent years countries with more similar climates have become even more similar in their mixes. This, however, does not necessarily mean that vignerons have been planting the varieties that are better adapted to their climates.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Core Ideas</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <div>\u0000 <ul>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Wine-producing countries have become more similar and concentrated in their mix of winegrape varieties.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>This similarity extends particularly among countries sharing similar climatic conditions.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>In recent years, countries with similar climates have continued to converge in their winegrape varietal mixes.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Nevertheless, vignerons have not necessarily been planting varieties that are better suited to their climates.</li>\u0000 </ul>\u0000 </div>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.70001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142525365","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Our connections to soil health through simile 我们通过比喻与土壤健康建立联系
IF 2.3 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI: 10.1002/ael2.70003
Alan J. Franzluebbers

Healthy soil supports the global carbon cycle, the water cycle, and many nutrient cycles to stabilize ecosystems. We take these processes for granted, and yet, disruptions to these cycles would be devastating if soils became defunct and plants could not photosynthesize. As with the health of the human body to which we rely on to carry out our daily lives, so too does the health of soil give essential life to our world. Strong corollaries exist between the functioning of the human body and the soil body. This essay explores these two bodies through simile. Just as we wish others good health, so too should each of us (and society) wish a world with excellent soil health. A foundational pathway laid by strong science, but pitched to engage more of the public in this effort to foster better soil health might be through non-traditional impressionistic storylines.

健康的土壤支持全球碳循环、水循环和许多养分循环,从而稳定生态系统。我们认为这些过程是理所当然的,然而,如果土壤失效,植物无法进行光合作用,那么这些循环的破坏将是毁灭性的。正如我们日常生活所依赖的人体健康一样,土壤的健康也为我们的世界提供了重要的生命力。人体的功能与土壤的功能之间存在着密切的必然联系。本文通过比喻来探讨这两种身体。正如我们希望他人身体健康一样,我们每个人(和社会)也应该希望世界拥有健康的土壤。让更多公众参与到促进土壤健康的努力中来,可以通过非传统的印象派故事情节来实现。
{"title":"Our connections to soil health through simile","authors":"Alan J. Franzluebbers","doi":"10.1002/ael2.70003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ael2.70003","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Healthy soil supports the global carbon cycle, the water cycle, and many nutrient cycles to stabilize ecosystems. We take these processes for granted, and yet, disruptions to these cycles would be devastating if soils became defunct and plants could not photosynthesize. As with the health of the human body to which we rely on to carry out our daily lives, so too does the health of soil give essential life to our world. Strong corollaries exist between the functioning of the human body and the soil body. This essay explores these two bodies through simile. Just as we wish others good health, so too should each of us (and society) wish a world with excellent soil health. A foundational pathway laid by strong science, but pitched to engage more of the public in this effort to foster better soil health might be through non-traditional impressionistic storylines.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.70003","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142525075","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
When are you measuring soil β-glucosidase activities in cropping systems? 什么时候测量种植系统中的土壤 β-葡萄糖苷酶活性?
IF 2.3 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI: 10.1002/ael2.70002
R. Michael Lehman, Shannon L. Osborne, Patrick M. Ewing

In situ soil respiration is driven by annual patterns of temperature and soil moisture, but what about extracellular enzyme activities responsible for depolymerizing soil organic matter? We conducted biweekly measurements of potential soil β-glucosidase activities during a 4-month period from March soil thawing through July in annually cropped field plots in eastern South Dakota. Our objective was to determine the best sampling time to resolve the effects of crop rotational diversity on soil microbial activities. Potential β-glucosidase activities were elevated immediately following soil thaw, peaked in May, and declined to their lowest value in mid-summer. Temperature and precipitation had no value in predicting enzyme activities; however, enzyme activities were affected by crop rotational diversity and responded to current crop and previous crop. These findings are pertinent to the use of soil extracellular enzymes in soil health assessments and as indicators of microbial substrate preference with implications for soil carbon stabilization.

原位土壤呼吸作用受温度和土壤湿度年度模式的影响,但负责解聚土壤有机物的胞外酶活性如何呢?从 3 月土壤解冻到 7 月的 4 个月期间,我们每两周对南达科塔州东部每年耕种的田块中潜在的土壤 β-葡萄糖苷酶活性进行一次测量。我们的目标是确定最佳采样时间,以确定作物轮作多样性对土壤微生物活动的影响。潜在的 β-葡萄糖苷酶活性在土壤解冻后立即升高,5 月份达到峰值,夏季中期降至最低值。温度和降水对预测酶活性没有价值;但是,酶活性受作物轮作多样性的影响,并对当前作物和之前作物做出反应。这些发现有助于在土壤健康评估中使用土壤胞外酶,也可作为微生物底物偏好的指标,对土壤碳稳定具有影响。
{"title":"When are you measuring soil β-glucosidase activities in cropping systems?","authors":"R. Michael Lehman,&nbsp;Shannon L. Osborne,&nbsp;Patrick M. Ewing","doi":"10.1002/ael2.70002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ael2.70002","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In situ soil respiration is driven by annual patterns of temperature and soil moisture, but what about extracellular enzyme activities responsible for depolymerizing soil organic matter? We conducted biweekly measurements of potential soil β-glucosidase activities during a 4-month period from March soil thawing through July in annually cropped field plots in eastern South Dakota. Our objective was to determine the best sampling time to resolve the effects of crop rotational diversity on soil microbial activities. Potential β-glucosidase activities were elevated immediately following soil thaw, peaked in May, and declined to their lowest value in mid-summer. Temperature and precipitation had no value in predicting enzyme activities; however, enzyme activities were affected by crop rotational diversity and responded to current crop and previous crop. These findings are pertinent to the use of soil extracellular enzymes in soil health assessments and as indicators of microbial substrate preference with implications for soil carbon stabilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.70002","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142525099","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Soil organic matter characteristics of four soil types under different conservation strategies across Hubei Province 湖北省不同保护策略下四种土壤类型的土壤有机质特征
IF 2.3 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI: 10.1002/ael2.70000
Wei Yang, Yangbo He, Xingsheng Song, Lirong Lin, Zhengchao Tian, Ying Zhou

Soil organic matter (SOM) plays key roles in sloping land erosion control. This study explores SOM content across Hubei Province, China, focusing on four soil types under various conservation strategies. Field samples (n = 243) were collected under 27 monitoring sites employing diverse conservation strategies in runoff plots. Results indicated substantial variability in SOM content among soil types, with calcareous soils exhibiting the highest levels (12.63 g kg−1). Conversely, red soils displayed the lowest SOM content (6.32 g kg−1). However, short-term conservation strategies and their interaction with soil type did not significantly influence SOM. The findings underscore the intricate relationship between soil types and SOM dynamics. This study contributes to the understanding of SOM dynamics in diverse landscapes, offering valuable guidance for policymakers and land managers to apply practices in mitigating erosion and enhancing soil health.

土壤有机质(SOM)在坡耕地水土流失控制中起着关键作用。本研究以不同水土保持策略下的四种土壤类型为重点,探讨了中国湖北省的土壤有机质含量。在 27 个采用不同水土保持策略的监测点的径流地块中采集了田间样本(n = 243)。结果表明,不同土壤类型的 SOM 含量差异很大,其中石灰性土壤的 SOM 含量最高(12.63 g kg-1)。相反,红壤的 SOM 含量最低(6.32 g kg-1)。然而,短期保护策略及其与土壤类型的相互作用对 SOM 并无显著影响。研究结果凸显了土壤类型与 SOM 动态之间错综复杂的关系。这项研究有助于人们了解不同地貌中的 SOM 动态,为政策制定者和土地管理者提供有价值的指导,以减少侵蚀和提高土壤健康水平。
{"title":"Soil organic matter characteristics of four soil types under different conservation strategies across Hubei Province","authors":"Wei Yang,&nbsp;Yangbo He,&nbsp;Xingsheng Song,&nbsp;Lirong Lin,&nbsp;Zhengchao Tian,&nbsp;Ying Zhou","doi":"10.1002/ael2.70000","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ael2.70000","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil organic matter (SOM) plays key roles in sloping land erosion control. This study explores SOM content across Hubei Province, China, focusing on four soil types under various conservation strategies. Field samples (<i>n</i> = 243) were collected under 27 monitoring sites employing diverse conservation strategies in runoff plots. Results indicated substantial variability in SOM content among soil types, with calcareous soils exhibiting the highest levels (12.63 g kg<sup>−1</sup>). Conversely, red soils displayed the lowest SOM content (6.32 g kg<sup>−1</sup>). However, short-term conservation strategies and their interaction with soil type did not significantly influence SOM. The findings underscore the intricate relationship between soil types and SOM dynamics. This study contributes to the understanding of SOM dynamics in diverse landscapes, offering valuable guidance for policymakers and land managers to apply practices in mitigating erosion and enhancing soil health.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.70000","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142448994","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A tool for integrating agrometeorological observation data for digital agriculture: A Minnesota case study 为数字农业整合农业气象观测数据的工具:明尼苏达州案例研究
IF 2.3 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI: 10.1002/ael2.20147
Logan Gall, Tom Glancy, Michael Kantar, Bryan C. Runck

Agrometeorological data are essential for understanding production using digital agriculture techniques. However, integrating agrometerological observations from multiple sources remains a challenge. Often, digital agriculture scientists download and clean the same datasets many times. We present a prototype system that simplifies the process of collecting, cleaning, integrating, and aggregating data from meteorological data sources by providing a simplified user interface, database, and application programming interface. The prototype provides a standard interface for querying multiple geospatial formats (raster and vector) and integrates observation networks including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Global Historical Climatology Network (NOAA GHCN), NOAA NClim-Grid (NOAA's Gridded Climate Normals), and Ameriflux BASE. The system automatically checks and updates data, saving storage space and processing time, and allows users to summarize data spatially and temporally. Provided as open source code and browser-based user interface, the application and integration system can be run across Windows, Linux, and Mac environments to support broader use of multi-source agrometeorology data.

农业气象数据对于利用数字农业技术了解生产情况至关重要。然而,整合多个来源的农业气象观测数据仍是一项挑战。数字农业科学家通常要多次下载和清理相同的数据集。我们提出了一个原型系统,通过提供简化的用户界面、数据库和应用程序接口,简化了从气象数据源收集、清理、整合和汇总数据的过程。原型系统提供了查询多种地理空间格式(栅格和矢量)的标准接口,并整合了观测网络,包括美国国家海洋和大气管理局全球历史气候学网络(NOAA GHCN)、NOAA NClim-Grid(NOAA 的网格气候标准)和 Ameriflux BASE。该系统可自动检查和更新数据,节省存储空间和处理时间,并允许用户对数据进行空间和时间汇总。该应用和集成系统以开放源代码和基于浏览器的用户界面提供,可在 Windows、Linux 和 Mac 环境中运行,支持更广泛地使用多源农业气象数据。
{"title":"A tool for integrating agrometeorological observation data for digital agriculture: A Minnesota case study","authors":"Logan Gall,&nbsp;Tom Glancy,&nbsp;Michael Kantar,&nbsp;Bryan C. Runck","doi":"10.1002/ael2.20147","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ael2.20147","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Agrometeorological data are essential for understanding production using digital agriculture techniques. However, integrating agrometerological observations from multiple sources remains a challenge. Often, digital agriculture scientists download and clean the same datasets many times. We present a prototype system that simplifies the process of collecting, cleaning, integrating, and aggregating data from meteorological data sources by providing a simplified user interface, database, and application programming interface. The prototype provides a standard interface for querying multiple geospatial formats (raster and vector) and integrates observation networks including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Global Historical Climatology Network (NOAA GHCN), NOAA NClim-Grid (NOAA's Gridded Climate Normals), and Ameriflux BASE. The system automatically checks and updates data, saving storage space and processing time, and allows users to summarize data spatially and temporally. Provided as open source code and browser-based user interface, the application and integration system can be run across Windows, Linux, and Mac environments to support broader use of multi-source agrometeorology data.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.20147","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142439117","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Including non-growing season emissions of N2O in US maize could raise net CO2e emissions by 31% annually 将美国玉米非生长季节的一氧化二氮排放量计算在内,每年可使二氧化碳净排放量增加 31
IF 2.3 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI: 10.1002/ael2.20146
Brian Buma

Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a significant greenhouse gas and the most important currently emitted ozone depleting substance, primarily via agricultural fertilization. Current N2O emission estimation methods at the national scale are predominantly via emission factors. Models estimating national-scale emissions are focused on growing season emissions. However, a substantial fraction of N2O can be emitted during non-growing season periods. Using newly published off-season N2O emission ratio maps and high-resolution nitrogen application data, this study explores the potential magnitude of underestimated N2O emissions if using only the default growing-season focused methodology. Although there is large variation at county scales (12%–35%), non-growing season national emissions are estimated at 31% of the total, a potential 12,000 Gg CO2e year−1. Further work should better refine emission estimates spatially as well as fully integrate estimates across growing and non-growing seasons.

一氧化二氮(N2O)是一种重要的温室气体,也是目前最重要的臭氧消耗物质,主要通过农业施肥排放。目前全国范围内的一氧化二氮排放估算方法主要是通过排放因子进行估算。估算全国范围排放的模型侧重于生长季节的排放。然而,有相当一部分一氧化二氮可能是在非生长季节排放的。本研究利用最新发布的非生长季节一氧化二氮排放比率图和高分辨率氮肥施用数据,探讨了如果仅使用默认的以生长季节为重点的方法,被低估的一氧化二氮排放量的潜在规模。尽管在县级范围内存在较大差异(12%-35%),但全国非生长季的排放量估计占总量的 31%,即每年可能排放 12,000 千兆克 CO2e。进一步的工作应更好地完善空间排放估算,并充分整合生长季节和非生长季节的估算。
{"title":"Including non-growing season emissions of N2O in US maize could raise net CO2e emissions by 31% annually","authors":"Brian Buma","doi":"10.1002/ael2.20146","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ael2.20146","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) is a significant greenhouse gas and the most important currently emitted ozone depleting substance, primarily via agricultural fertilization. Current N<sub>2</sub>O emission estimation methods at the national scale are predominantly via emission factors. Models estimating national-scale emissions are focused on growing season emissions. However, a substantial fraction of N<sub>2</sub>O can be emitted during non-growing season periods. Using newly published off-season N<sub>2</sub>O emission ratio maps and high-resolution nitrogen application data, this study explores the potential magnitude of underestimated N<sub>2</sub>O emissions if using only the default growing-season focused methodology. Although there is large variation at county scales (12%–35%), non-growing season national emissions are estimated at 31% of the total, a potential 12,000 Gg CO<sub>2</sub>e year<sup>−1</sup>. Further work should better refine emission estimates spatially as well as fully integrate estimates across growing and non-growing seasons.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.20146","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142169868","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cross-correlating soil aggregate stability methods to facilitate universal interpretation 交叉关联土壤集料稳定性方法,促进通用解释
IF 2.3 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI: 10.1002/ael2.20145
Deborah Aller, Joseph P. Amsili, Harold M. van Es

Aggregate stability is a critical physical indicator of soil health. However, multiple methods are used for measuring aggregate stability, making it difficult to compare results and limiting universal interpretations in soil health assessment frameworks like Soil Health Assessment Protocol and Evaluation. We cross-correlated three common water-stable aggregate methods (WSACASH, WSAARS, and WSASLAKES) using a dataset of nearly 1400 samples and developed pedotransfer functions using random forest models to evaluate method performance. We found that the WSAARS and WSACASH methods can be reasonably cross correlated through pedotransfer functions because they use similar processes for estimating aggregate strength. Conversely, the WSAARS and WSASLAKES methods are not transferable. We suggest that the WSAARS aggregate stability method is the most established and best reference method for use in soil health analysis frameworks. Interpretation consistency will lead to more robust comparisons of aggregate stability as a key physical soil health indicator.

Core Ideas

  • Different approaches for measuring aggregate stability prevent generalized result interpretation.
  • The water-stable aggregate wet sieve procedure (WSAARS) is proposed as the reference method for interpretation.
  • Other soil aggregate stability methods can be variably correlated with WSAARS.
集料稳定性是土壤健康的一个重要物理指标。然而,目前有多种方法可用于测量集料稳定性,因此很难对结果进行比较,也限制了土壤健康评估框架(如《土壤健康评估规程与评价》)的通用解释。我们使用近 1400 个样本的数据集对三种常见的水稳定性团聚体方法(WSACASH、WSAARS 和 WSASLAKES)进行了交叉关联,并使用随机森林模型开发了 pedotransfer 函数来评估方法的性能。我们发现,由于 WSAARS 和 WSACASH 方法采用了类似的骨料强度估算过程,因此可以通过脚印转移函数进行合理的交叉关联。相反,WSAARS 和 WSASLAKES 方法则无法相互转换。我们建议,WSAARS 集料稳定性方法是土壤健康分析框架中最成熟、最佳的参考方法。解释的一致性将使作为土壤健康关键物理指标的集料稳定性的比较更加可靠。 核心理念 不同的集料稳定性测量方法阻碍了对结果的通用解释。 建议将水稳集料湿筛程序(WSAARS)作为解释的参考方法。 其他土壤集料稳定性方法可与 WSAARS 进行不同程度的关联。
{"title":"Cross-correlating soil aggregate stability methods to facilitate universal interpretation","authors":"Deborah Aller,&nbsp;Joseph P. Amsili,&nbsp;Harold M. van Es","doi":"10.1002/ael2.20145","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ael2.20145","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <p>Aggregate stability is a critical physical indicator of soil health. However, multiple methods are used for measuring aggregate stability, making it difficult to compare results and limiting universal interpretations in soil health assessment frameworks like Soil Health Assessment Protocol and Evaluation. We cross-correlated three common water-stable aggregate methods (WSA<sub>CASH</sub>, WSA<sub>ARS</sub>, and WSA<sub>SLAKES</sub>) using a dataset of nearly 1400 samples and developed pedotransfer functions using random forest models to evaluate method performance. We found that the WSA<sub>ARS</sub> and WSA<sub>CASH</sub> methods can be reasonably cross correlated through pedotransfer functions because they use similar processes for estimating aggregate strength. Conversely, the WSA<sub>ARS</sub> and WSA<sub>SLAKES</sub> methods are not transferable. We suggest that the WSA<sub>ARS</sub> aggregate stability method is the most established and best reference method for use in soil health analysis frameworks. Interpretation consistency will lead to more robust comparisons of aggregate stability as a key physical soil health indicator.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Core Ideas</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <div>\u0000 <ul>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Different approaches for measuring aggregate stability prevent generalized result interpretation.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>The water-stable aggregate wet sieve procedure (WSA<sub>ARS</sub>) is proposed as the reference method for interpretation.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Other soil aggregate stability methods can be variably correlated with WSA<sub>ARS</sub>.</li>\u0000 </ul>\u0000 </div>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.20145","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141991596","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Revisiting agricultural science and organic farming 重新审视农业科学和有机农业
IF 2.3 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI: 10.1002/ael2.20139
Kristian Nikolai Jæger Hansen
<p>The decision whether to manage agriculture according to organic farming principles or conventional farming is a question bigger than scientific inquiry; it constitutes a political question. Similarly, deciding the regulations governing organic and conventional production does not fall within the pursuit of science. Rather, science should show how different management practices influence the environment. The regulatory framework of organic farming is derived from normative values rather than scientific principles, which now categorizes the production.</p><p>McGuire (<span>2017</span>) contend that ideology and science do not blend well. However, researchers inherently possess normative values, which shape their research interests and perspectives. It could be argued that this is only problematic when the goal of the scientific pursuit and ideology crosses, thus becoming activistic. This can harm the scientific process by drawing wrongful conclusions upon poorly constructed experiments, and thus the scientific process in general. All scientific decisions—for example., formulating a research question, designing the study, and analyzing the data—are conducted by humans, with values and experiences influencing their choices, therefore including some normative values (Reed, <span>2011</span>; Risjord, <span>2016</span>). While this is generally recognized by social sciences, natural sciences often neglect it.</p><p>Analysis of studies comparing the environmental impacts of organic and conventional farming show variation in environmental impact, as for dairy production (Cederberg & Mattsson, <span>2000</span>; De Boer, <span>2003</span>; Kristensen et al., <span>2011</span>; Thomassen et al., <span>2008</span>). When assessing the two production regimes the production level between the systems is seemingly important. This is because emission or environmental impact are often divided upon the emission per produced product, which as an effect of production levels obtained is favoring higher production. Organic farming utilizes less resources per produced product, but often has a lower productivity. Organic farming, however, often claims other ideologic values besides production, such as health, ecology, fairness, and care (IFOAM, <span>2005</span>).</p><p>Comparison of organic and conventional management also raises the question of whether the production systems are similar enough to be comparable. Both organic and conventional production can be described with the goal to produce goods to sell, while somehow having different aims. Organic farming emphasizes different values, complicating direct statistical comparisons with conventional systems, since these values are not described with a reductionistic approach. The external values in organic production seem to have a cost, often resulting in lower productivity than conventional production.</p><p>The reasoning of McGuire (<span>2017</span>), who advocates that organic agriculture should change its
是按照有机耕作原则管理农业,还是按照常规耕作原则管理农业,这是一个比科学探索更大的问题,是一个政治问题。同样,决定有机生产和常规生产的管理条例也不属于追求科学的范畴。相反,科学应该说明不同的管理方法如何影响环境。有机农业的监管框架源于规范性价值观,而非科学原则,现在对生产进行了分类。McGuire(2017)认为,意识形态与科学并不能很好地融合。然而,研究人员本质上拥有规范性价值观,这些价值观决定了他们的研究兴趣和视角。可以说,只有当科学追求的目标与意识形态发生交叉,从而变得激进时,才会出现问题。这会损害科学进程,因为他们会根据拙劣的实验得出错误的结论,进而损害整个科学进程。所有科学决策--例如,提出研究问题、设计研究和分析数据--都是由人类做出的,他们的价值观和经验影响着他们的选择,因此也包括一些规范性价值观(Reed,2011;Risjord,2016)。虽然社会科学普遍认识到这一点,但自然科学往往忽视了这一点。对有机农业和传统农业对环境影响的比较研究分析表明,两者对环境的影响存在差异,例如对乳制品生产的影响(Cederberg & Mattsson, 2000; De Boer, 2003; Kristensen 等人, 2011; Thomassen 等人, 2008)。在评估两种生产体系时,体系间的生产水平似乎很重要。这是因为排放或环境影响通常是根据每件产品的排放来划分的,而生产水平的高低会对生产产生影响。有机农业每生产一件产品所消耗的资源较少,但生产率往往较低。然而,有机耕作除了生产外,还经常主张其他意识形态价值,如健康、生态、公平和关爱(IFOAM,2005 年)。有机生产和常规生产都可以说是以生产销售商品为目标,但在某种程度上又有不同的目的。有机农业强调不同的价值,这使得与常规生产系统进行直接统计比较变得复杂,因为这些价值不是用还原法来描述的。麦奎尔(McGuire,2017 年)主张有机农业应改变手段(通过提高产量)以实现环境友好,其推理也可能意味着传统生产可以从有机生产中学到一些东西,即在不严重影响产出的情况下减少生产投入。文章还提出了一种规范性意见,即科学应改变人们对有机农业的态度,而科学的主要作用是评估生产的影响,而不是政治性的。Kristian Nikolai Jæger Hansen:构思;写作-原稿;写作-审阅和编辑。
{"title":"Revisiting agricultural science and organic farming","authors":"Kristian Nikolai Jæger Hansen","doi":"10.1002/ael2.20139","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ael2.20139","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;The decision whether to manage agriculture according to organic farming principles or conventional farming is a question bigger than scientific inquiry; it constitutes a political question. Similarly, deciding the regulations governing organic and conventional production does not fall within the pursuit of science. Rather, science should show how different management practices influence the environment. The regulatory framework of organic farming is derived from normative values rather than scientific principles, which now categorizes the production.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;McGuire (&lt;span&gt;2017&lt;/span&gt;) contend that ideology and science do not blend well. However, researchers inherently possess normative values, which shape their research interests and perspectives. It could be argued that this is only problematic when the goal of the scientific pursuit and ideology crosses, thus becoming activistic. This can harm the scientific process by drawing wrongful conclusions upon poorly constructed experiments, and thus the scientific process in general. All scientific decisions—for example., formulating a research question, designing the study, and analyzing the data—are conducted by humans, with values and experiences influencing their choices, therefore including some normative values (Reed, &lt;span&gt;2011&lt;/span&gt;; Risjord, &lt;span&gt;2016&lt;/span&gt;). While this is generally recognized by social sciences, natural sciences often neglect it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Analysis of studies comparing the environmental impacts of organic and conventional farming show variation in environmental impact, as for dairy production (Cederberg &amp; Mattsson, &lt;span&gt;2000&lt;/span&gt;; De Boer, &lt;span&gt;2003&lt;/span&gt;; Kristensen et al., &lt;span&gt;2011&lt;/span&gt;; Thomassen et al., &lt;span&gt;2008&lt;/span&gt;). When assessing the two production regimes the production level between the systems is seemingly important. This is because emission or environmental impact are often divided upon the emission per produced product, which as an effect of production levels obtained is favoring higher production. Organic farming utilizes less resources per produced product, but often has a lower productivity. Organic farming, however, often claims other ideologic values besides production, such as health, ecology, fairness, and care (IFOAM, &lt;span&gt;2005&lt;/span&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Comparison of organic and conventional management also raises the question of whether the production systems are similar enough to be comparable. Both organic and conventional production can be described with the goal to produce goods to sell, while somehow having different aims. Organic farming emphasizes different values, complicating direct statistical comparisons with conventional systems, since these values are not described with a reductionistic approach. The external values in organic production seem to have a cost, often resulting in lower productivity than conventional production.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The reasoning of McGuire (&lt;span&gt;2017&lt;/span&gt;), who advocates that organic agriculture should change its ","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.20139","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141991597","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trends in the yield response to nitrogen of winter wheat in Oklahoma 俄克拉荷马州冬小麦产量对氮反应的趋势
IF 2.3 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI: 10.1002/ael2.20143
Amadeo F. Panyi, B. Wade Brorsen

This study seeks to explain how the response of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to nitrogen at Lahoma, OK, has changed over time. This objective was motivated by the need for accurate estimation of optimal nitrogen recommendations and to understand why optimal nitrogen rates have changed over time. Yields increased over time, except at the 0 and 22 kg N ha−1 rates of applied nitrogen. Bayesian methods were used to estimate linear plateau models where each parameter has its own time trend. Results show no trend in intercept, an increase of 1.3% per year in the slope coefficient, a 1.9% per year increase in the difference between the plateau and intercept, and a 33% increase in the optimal nitrogen rates from 1971 to 2023. These trends suggest the need to update nitrogen recommendations and help explain why the yield goal approach became imprecise over time due to changing yield potential.

Core Ideas

  • The yield of winter wheat went up over time with nitrogen rates of 45 kg N ha−1 or higher.
  • The yield on check plots with no nitrogen did not change.
  • The slope and plateau of the linear plateau model of wheat yield response went up over 1% per year.
  • Optimal nitrogen went up over 33% over time based on the estimated linear response stochastic plateau model.
本研究旨在解释俄克拉荷马州拉霍马的冬小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)对氮的反应是如何随着时间的推移而变化的。之所以要实现这一目标,是因为需要准确估算最佳氮素推荐量,并了解最佳氮素用量随时间推移发生变化的原因。除了 0 和 22 千克氮公顷-1 的施氮量外,产量随着时间的推移而增加。贝叶斯方法用于估计线性高原模型,其中每个参数都有自己的时间趋势。结果表明,截距没有趋势,斜率系数每年增加 1.3%,高原与截距之差每年增加 1.9%,最佳施氮率从 1971 年到 2023 年增加了 33%。这些趋势表明有必要更新氮肥建议,并有助于解释为什么随着时间的推移,产量目标法会因产量潜力的变化而变得不精确。 核心观点 每公顷 45 千克氮含量或更高时,冬小麦的产量随时间推移而增加。 无氮对照地块的产量没有变化。 小麦产量响应线性高原模型的斜率和高原每年上升超过 1%。 根据估计的线性响应随机高原模型,最佳施氮量随着时间的推移增加了 33%以上。
{"title":"Trends in the yield response to nitrogen of winter wheat in Oklahoma","authors":"Amadeo F. Panyi,&nbsp;B. Wade Brorsen","doi":"10.1002/ael2.20143","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ael2.20143","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <p>This study seeks to explain how the response of winter wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum L</i>.) to nitrogen at Lahoma, OK, has changed over time. This objective was motivated by the need for accurate estimation of optimal nitrogen recommendations and to understand why optimal nitrogen rates have changed over time. Yields increased over time, except at the 0 and 22 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> rates of applied nitrogen. Bayesian methods were used to estimate linear plateau models where each parameter has its own time trend. Results show no trend in intercept, an increase of 1.3% per year in the slope coefficient, a 1.9% per year increase in the difference between the plateau and intercept, and a 33% increase in the optimal nitrogen rates from 1971 to 2023. These trends suggest the need to update nitrogen recommendations and help explain why the yield goal approach became imprecise over time due to changing yield potential.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Core Ideas</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <div>\u0000 <ul>\u0000 \u0000 <li>The yield of winter wheat went up over time with nitrogen rates of 45 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> or higher.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>The yield on check plots with no nitrogen did not change.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>The slope and plateau of the linear plateau model of wheat yield response went up over 1% per year.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Optimal nitrogen went up over 33% over time based on the estimated linear response stochastic plateau model.</li>\u0000 </ul>\u0000 </div>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.20143","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141980383","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Artificial intelligence in soil science: Where do we go now? 土壤科学中的人工智能:我们该何去何从?
IF 2.3 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1002/ael2.20134
Jose Pablo Castro, Caley K. Gasch, Paulo Flores

Recognizing the fast advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) in soil science, the main objective of this commentary paper is to discuss how this technology is being incorporated into the discipline, focusing on the most common algorithms and their applications. Employing a discursive and reflective methodology, the article draws insights from the authors' expertise and opinions. The paper explores some ethical considerations and the potential impact of AI on the job market and calls for a balanced approach that maximizes the benefits of this technology while vigilantly mitigating its negative implications to ensure the integrity and inclusivity of the profession.

Core Ideas

  • Artificial intelligence (AI) is changing soil science with advanced analytic and predictive modeling tools.
  • Ethical AI in soil science should focus on data integrity, privacy, and transparent research.
  • AI is reshaping the soil science job market, emphasizing the need for adaptability, and continuous learning.
  • Collaboration between technology and soil experts can lead to groundbreaking research and academic solutions.
  • AI, as a complementary tool, can enhance soil scientists' expertise, creativity, and problem-solving abilities.
认识到人工智能(AI)在土壤科学领域的快速发展,本评论文章的主要目的是讨论如何将这一技术融入该学科,重点关注最常见的算法及其应用。文章采用辨证和反思的方法,从作者的专业知识和观点中汲取见解。本文探讨了人工智能对就业市场的一些伦理考虑和潜在影响,并呼吁采取一种平衡的方法,在最大限度地发挥这项技术的益处的同时,警惕地减少其负面影响,以确保该行业的完整性和包容性。 核心观点 人工智能(AI)正在通过先进的分析和预测建模工具改变土壤科学。 土壤科学中的道德人工智能应关注数据完整性、隐私和透明研究。 人工智能正在重塑土壤科学就业市场,强调适应性和持续学习的必要性。 技术和土壤专家之间的合作可以带来突破性的研究和学术解决方案。 人工智能作为一种补充工具,可以提高土壤科学家的专业知识、创造力和解决问题的能力。
{"title":"Artificial intelligence in soil science: Where do we go now?","authors":"Jose Pablo Castro,&nbsp;Caley K. Gasch,&nbsp;Paulo Flores","doi":"10.1002/ael2.20134","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ael2.20134","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <p>Recognizing the fast advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) in soil science, the main objective of this commentary paper is to discuss how this technology is being incorporated into the discipline, focusing on the most common algorithms and their applications. Employing a discursive and reflective methodology, the article draws insights from the authors' expertise and opinions. The paper explores some ethical considerations and the potential impact of AI on the job market and calls for a balanced approach that maximizes the benefits of this technology while vigilantly mitigating its negative implications to ensure the integrity and inclusivity of the profession.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Core Ideas</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <div>\u0000 <ul>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Artificial intelligence (AI) is changing soil science with advanced analytic and predictive modeling tools.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Ethical AI in soil science should focus on data integrity, privacy, and transparent research.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>AI is reshaping the soil science job market, emphasizing the need for adaptability, and continuous learning.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Collaboration between technology and soil experts can lead to groundbreaking research and academic solutions.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>AI, as a complementary tool, can enhance soil scientists' expertise, creativity, and problem-solving abilities.</li>\u0000 </ul>\u0000 </div>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.20134","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141966668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Agricultural & Environmental Letters
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1