Results on left–right Artin approximation for algebraic morphisms and for analytic morphisms of weakly-finite singularity type

IF 1 2区 数学 Q1 MATHEMATICS Journal of the London Mathematical Society-Second Series Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1112/jlms.70053
Dmitry Kerner
{"title":"Results on left–right Artin approximation for algebraic morphisms and for analytic morphisms of weakly-finite singularity type","authors":"Dmitry Kerner","doi":"10.1112/jlms.70053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The classical Artin approximation (AP) reads: any formal solution of a system of (analytic, resp., algebraic) equations of implicit function type is approximated by “ordinary” solutions (i.e., analytic, resp., algebraic). Morphisms of scheme-germs, for example, <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>M</mi>\n <mi>a</mi>\n <mi>p</mi>\n <mi>s</mi>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <msup>\n <mi>k</mi>\n <mi>n</mi>\n </msup>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mi>o</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <msup>\n <mi>k</mi>\n <mi>m</mi>\n </msup>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mi>o</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$Maps\\big ((\\mathbb {k}^n,o),(\\mathbb {k}^m,o)\\big)$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, are usually studied up to the left–right equivalence. The natural question is the left–right version of AP: when is the formal left–right equivalence of morphisms approximated by the “ordinary” (i.e., analytic, resp., algebraic) equivalence? In this case, the standard AP is not directly applicable, as the involved (functional) equations are not of implicit function type. Moreover, the naive extension does not hold in the analytic case, because of Osgood–Gabrielov–Shiota examples. The left–right version of Artin approximation (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>L</mi>\n <mi>R</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\mathcal L\\mathcal {R}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>.AP) was established by M. Shiota for morphisms that are either Nash or [real-analytic and of finite singularity type]. We establish <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>L</mi>\n <mi>R</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\mathcal L\\mathcal {R}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>.AP and its stronger version of Płoski (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>L</mi>\n <mi>R</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\mathcal L\\mathcal {R}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>.APP) for <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>M</mi>\n <mi>a</mi>\n <mi>p</mi>\n <mi>s</mi>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mi>X</mi>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mi>Y</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$Maps (X,Y)$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, where <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>X</mi>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mi>Y</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$X,Y$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> are analytic/algebraic germs of schemes of any characteristic. More precisely: \n\n </p><p>This latter class of morphisms of “weakly-finite singularity type” (which we introduce) is of separate importance. It extends naturally the traditional class of morphisms of “finite singularity type,” while preserving their nonpathological behavior. The definition goes via the higher critical loci and higher discriminants of morphisms with singular targets. We establish basic properties of these critical loci. In particular, any map is finitely (right) determined by its higher critical loci.</p>","PeriodicalId":49989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the London Mathematical Society-Second Series","volume":"111 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the London Mathematical Society-Second Series","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1112/jlms.70053","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The classical Artin approximation (AP) reads: any formal solution of a system of (analytic, resp., algebraic) equations of implicit function type is approximated by “ordinary” solutions (i.e., analytic, resp., algebraic). Morphisms of scheme-germs, for example, M a p s ( ( k n , o ) , ( k m , o ) ) $Maps\big ((\mathbb {k}^n,o),(\mathbb {k}^m,o)\big)$ , are usually studied up to the left–right equivalence. The natural question is the left–right version of AP: when is the formal left–right equivalence of morphisms approximated by the “ordinary” (i.e., analytic, resp., algebraic) equivalence? In this case, the standard AP is not directly applicable, as the involved (functional) equations are not of implicit function type. Moreover, the naive extension does not hold in the analytic case, because of Osgood–Gabrielov–Shiota examples. The left–right version of Artin approximation ( L R $\mathcal L\mathcal {R}$ .AP) was established by M. Shiota for morphisms that are either Nash or [real-analytic and of finite singularity type]. We establish L R $\mathcal L\mathcal {R}$ .AP and its stronger version of Płoski ( L R $\mathcal L\mathcal {R}$ .APP) for M a p s ( X , Y ) $Maps (X,Y)$ , where X , Y $X,Y$ are analytic/algebraic germs of schemes of any characteristic. More precisely:

This latter class of morphisms of “weakly-finite singularity type” (which we introduce) is of separate importance. It extends naturally the traditional class of morphisms of “finite singularity type,” while preserving their nonpathological behavior. The definition goes via the higher critical loci and higher discriminants of morphisms with singular targets. We establish basic properties of these critical loci. In particular, any map is finitely (right) determined by its higher critical loci.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经典的阿尔丁近似(AP)是这样的:隐函数式(解析式,或代数式)方程组的任何形式解都可以用 "普通 "解(即解析式,或代数式)来近似。图解符号的变形,例如 M a p s ( ( k n , o ) , ( k m , o ) ) , ( k m , o ) ) $Maps\big ((\mathbb {k}^n,o),(\mathbb {k}^m,o)\big)$ ,通常研究到左右等价为止。自然而然的问题是左-右版本的 AP:什么时候形态的形式左-右等价近似于 "普通"(即解析的,也就是代数的)等价?在这种情况下,标准 AP 并不直接适用,因为所涉及的(函数)方程并不属于隐函数类型。此外,由于 Osgood-Gabrielov-Shiota 例子,天真的扩展在解析情况下也不成立。汐田(M. Shiota)针对纳什或[实解析和有限奇点类型]的形态建立了阿廷近似的左右版本(L R $\mathcal L\mathcal {R}$ .AP)。我们为 M a p s ( X , Y ) $Maps (X,Y)$ 建立了 L R $\mathcal L\mathcal {R}$ .AP 及其更强版本 Płoski ( L R $\mathcal L\mathcal {R}$ .APP) ,其中 X , Y $X,Y$ 是任意特征方案的解析/代数胚芽。更确切地说: 后一类 "弱有限奇点类型 "的态射(我们引入的)具有单独的重要性。它自然地扩展了传统的 "有限奇异性类型 "变形,同时保留了它们的非病理性行为。这个定义是通过具有奇异目标的态的高临界位置和高判别式来实现的。我们建立了这些临界点的基本性质。特别是,任何映射都是由其高临界点有限(右)决定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the London Mathematical Society has been publishing leading research in a broad range of mathematical subject areas since 1926. The Journal welcomes papers on subjects of general interest that represent a significant advance in mathematical knowledge, as well as submissions that are deemed to stimulate new interest and research activity.
期刊最新文献
The Poincaré-extended a b $\mathbf {a}\mathbf {b}$ -index The Ekström–Persson conjecture regarding random covering sets Central limit theorem for smooth statistics of one-dimensional free fermions Normalizers and centralizers of subnormal subsystems of fusion systems Asymptotic dimension for covers with controlled growth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1