{"title":"The effectiveness of development-oriented nonreciprocal trade preferences in promoting agricultural trade","authors":"William Ridley, Farzana Shirin","doi":"10.1111/ajae.12486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Nonreciprocal trade preference (NRTP) programs have proliferated in recent decades as a means to facilitate export-led growth for beneficiary countries. However, evidence on the efficacy of NRTPs in promoting agricultural exports from preference beneficiaries to preference donors has been mixed. We investigate the impacts of NRTPs on such trade in a structural gravity setting for 23 major agricultural commodities prominent in the export baskets of developing countries. Based on estimates from a commodity-level gravity model and the structural foundation of the gravity framework, we quantify the trade impacts of NRTP programs in a counterfactual simulation analysis. Our results show that NRTPs were responsible for around $833 million in elevated annual exports (a 1.7% increase) from NRTP beneficiary countries to donor countries as of 2018, and we document considerable heterogeneity in the countries and commodities that undergo the largest impacts. Our findings thus highlight the evolving role of trade policy as a facilitator of export-driven growth and suggest that NRTP programs are often limited in their capacity to promote agricultural trade.</p>","PeriodicalId":55537,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"107 1","pages":"81-107"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajae.12486","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajae.12486","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Nonreciprocal trade preference (NRTP) programs have proliferated in recent decades as a means to facilitate export-led growth for beneficiary countries. However, evidence on the efficacy of NRTPs in promoting agricultural exports from preference beneficiaries to preference donors has been mixed. We investigate the impacts of NRTPs on such trade in a structural gravity setting for 23 major agricultural commodities prominent in the export baskets of developing countries. Based on estimates from a commodity-level gravity model and the structural foundation of the gravity framework, we quantify the trade impacts of NRTP programs in a counterfactual simulation analysis. Our results show that NRTPs were responsible for around $833 million in elevated annual exports (a 1.7% increase) from NRTP beneficiary countries to donor countries as of 2018, and we document considerable heterogeneity in the countries and commodities that undergo the largest impacts. Our findings thus highlight the evolving role of trade policy as a facilitator of export-driven growth and suggest that NRTP programs are often limited in their capacity to promote agricultural trade.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Agricultural Economics provides a forum for creative and scholarly work on the economics of agriculture and food, natural resources and the environment, and rural and community development throughout the world. Papers should relate to one of these areas, should have a problem orientation, and should demonstrate originality and innovation in analysis, methods, or application. Analyses of problems pertinent to research, extension, and teaching are equally encouraged, as is interdisciplinary research with a significant economic component. Review articles that offer a comprehensive and insightful survey of a relevant subject, consistent with the scope of the Journal as discussed above, will also be considered. All articles published, regardless of their nature, will be held to the same set of scholarly standards.