Investigating the contributing factors to autonomous Vehicle-Road user Conflicts: A Data-Driven approach.

IF 5.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS Accident; analysis and prevention Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2024.107898
Mahdi Gabaire, Haniyeh Ghomi, Mohamed Hussein
{"title":"Investigating the contributing factors to autonomous Vehicle-Road user Conflicts: A Data-Driven approach.","authors":"Mahdi Gabaire, Haniyeh Ghomi, Mohamed Hussein","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2024.107898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the imminent widespread integration of Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) into our traffic ecosystem, understanding the factors that impact their safety is a vital research area. To that end, this study assessed the impact of a wide range of factors on the frequency of AV-road user conflicts. The study utilized the Woven prediction and validation dataset, which contains over 1000 h of data collected from the onboard sensors of 20 AVs in California. Two Copula-based models were developed to investigate the contributing factors to total and severe AV conflicts in road segments (model M1) and intersections (model M2). For road segments, results indicated that road characteristics (direction, number of lanes, road length, speed limit, the presence of a dividing median) and road infrastructure (presence of bus stops, presence of cycle lanes, and presence of on-street parking) have a significant impact on the hourly conflict rates. Regarding the rate of severe conflicts, road user volume, road characteristics (direction, road type, access point density, the presence of a dividing median), and the presence of cycle lanes were identified as the most influential factors. For intersections, the road user volume and the presence of a physical median were found to be positively associated with the hourly conflict rates, while road user volume, intersection characteristics (posted speed limit, lack of traffic control signals, presence of pedestrian crossing, presence of cycle lane, presence of a dividing median, and truck percentage), and the dominant land use at the intersection area were the most impactful variables on the frequency of severe conflicts.</p>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"211 ","pages":"107898"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2024.107898","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the imminent widespread integration of Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) into our traffic ecosystem, understanding the factors that impact their safety is a vital research area. To that end, this study assessed the impact of a wide range of factors on the frequency of AV-road user conflicts. The study utilized the Woven prediction and validation dataset, which contains over 1000 h of data collected from the onboard sensors of 20 AVs in California. Two Copula-based models were developed to investigate the contributing factors to total and severe AV conflicts in road segments (model M1) and intersections (model M2). For road segments, results indicated that road characteristics (direction, number of lanes, road length, speed limit, the presence of a dividing median) and road infrastructure (presence of bus stops, presence of cycle lanes, and presence of on-street parking) have a significant impact on the hourly conflict rates. Regarding the rate of severe conflicts, road user volume, road characteristics (direction, road type, access point density, the presence of a dividing median), and the presence of cycle lanes were identified as the most influential factors. For intersections, the road user volume and the presence of a physical median were found to be positively associated with the hourly conflict rates, while road user volume, intersection characteristics (posted speed limit, lack of traffic control signals, presence of pedestrian crossing, presence of cycle lane, presence of a dividing median, and truck percentage), and the dominant land use at the intersection area were the most impactful variables on the frequency of severe conflicts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
16.90%
发文量
264
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.
期刊最新文献
A comprehensive multi-objective framework for the estimation of crash frequency models. Conflict resolution behavior of autonomous vehicles at intersections under mixed traffic environment. Investigating the contributing factors to autonomous Vehicle-Road user Conflicts: A Data-Driven approach. Analysis of factors affecting pedestrian safety for the elderly and identification of vulnerable areas in Seoul. How does distraction affect cyclists' severe crashes? A hybrid CatBoost-SHAP and random parameters binary logit approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1