Eye tracker calibration: How well can humans refixate a target?

IF 4.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Behavior Research Methods Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.3758/s13428-024-02564-4
Ignace T C Hooge, Roy S Hessels, Diederick C Niehorster, Richard Andersson, Marta K Skrok, Robert Konklewski, Patrycjusz Stremplewski, Maciej Nowakowski, Szymon Tamborski, Anna Szkulmowska, Maciej Szkulmowski, Marcus Nyström
{"title":"Eye tracker calibration: How well can humans refixate a target?","authors":"Ignace T C Hooge, Roy S Hessels, Diederick C Niehorster, Richard Andersson, Marta K Skrok, Robert Konklewski, Patrycjusz Stremplewski, Maciej Nowakowski, Szymon Tamborski, Anna Szkulmowska, Maciej Szkulmowski, Marcus Nyström","doi":"10.3758/s13428-024-02564-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Irrespective of the precision, the inaccuracy of a pupil-based eye tracker is about 0.5 <math><mmultiscripts><mrow></mrow> <mrow></mrow> <mo>∘</mo></mmultiscripts> </math> . This paper delves into two factors that potentially increase the inaccuracy of the gaze signal, namely, 1) Pupil-size changes and the pupil-size artefact (PSA) and 2) the putative inability of experienced individuals to precisely refixate a visual target. Experiment 1 utilizes a traditional pupil-CR eye tracker, while Experiment 2 employs a retinal eye tracker, the FreezeEye tracker, eliminating the pupil-based estimation. Results reveal that the PSA significantly affects gaze accuracy, introducing up to 0.5 <math><mmultiscripts><mrow></mrow> <mrow></mrow> <mo>∘</mo></mmultiscripts> </math> inaccuracies during calibration and validation. Corrections based on the relation between pupil size and apparent gaze shift substantially reduce inaccuracies, underscoring the PSA's influence on eye-tracking quality. Conversely, Experiment 2 demonstrates humans' precise refixation abilities, suggesting that the accuracy of the gaze signal is not limited by human refixation inconsistencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8717,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Research Methods","volume":"57 1","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Research Methods","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02564-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Irrespective of the precision, the inaccuracy of a pupil-based eye tracker is about 0.5 . This paper delves into two factors that potentially increase the inaccuracy of the gaze signal, namely, 1) Pupil-size changes and the pupil-size artefact (PSA) and 2) the putative inability of experienced individuals to precisely refixate a visual target. Experiment 1 utilizes a traditional pupil-CR eye tracker, while Experiment 2 employs a retinal eye tracker, the FreezeEye tracker, eliminating the pupil-based estimation. Results reveal that the PSA significantly affects gaze accuracy, introducing up to 0.5 inaccuracies during calibration and validation. Corrections based on the relation between pupil size and apparent gaze shift substantially reduce inaccuracies, underscoring the PSA's influence on eye-tracking quality. Conversely, Experiment 2 demonstrates humans' precise refixation abilities, suggesting that the accuracy of the gaze signal is not limited by human refixation inconsistencies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.30%
发文量
266
期刊介绍: Behavior Research Methods publishes articles concerned with the methods, techniques, and instrumentation of research in experimental psychology. The journal focuses particularly on the use of computer technology in psychological research. An annual special issue is devoted to this field.
期刊最新文献
Eye tracker calibration: How well can humans refixate a target? Individual differences in online research: Comparing lab-based and online administration of a psycholinguistic battery of linguistic and domain-general skills. The Salford Nature Environments Database (SNED): an open-access database of standardized high-quality pictures from natural environments. A modular machine learning tool for holistic and fine-grained behavioral analysis. 5956 German affective norms for atmospheres in organizations (GANAiO).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1