Predicting most comfortable listening levels of ESRT from ECAP thresholds in paediatric cochlear implant users.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.112194
Periannan Jawahar Antony, Palani Saravanan, Manjula Puttapasappa, Geetha Chinnaraj, Megha
{"title":"Predicting most comfortable listening levels of ESRT from ECAP thresholds in paediatric cochlear implant users.","authors":"Periannan Jawahar Antony, Palani Saravanan, Manjula Puttapasappa, Geetha Chinnaraj, Megha","doi":"10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.112194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies have reported a varied correlation strength between the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) and electrically evoked stapedial reflex thresholds (ESRT) in cochlear implant recipients. However, there is a lack of information on the relationship between the two measures in paediatric cochlear implant users. This study was aimed to compare the ESRT and ECAP measures and determine where ECAP thresholds fall within the dynamic range of ESRT-based Maps in paediatric cochlear implant users. The study involved 40 children aged between 3 and 6 years and were implanted with MedEL cochlear implant device unilaterally. ESRT and ECAP thresholds were measured for all twelve electrodes during the same mapping session, three months after cochlear implant activation. The results revealed significant differences between ECAP and ESRT thresholds across all electrodes. A significant moderate correlation between ESRT and ECAP thresholds was observed on all electrodes. The ECAP thresholds could predict the ESRT based Most comfortable levels (MCLs) significantly. Notably, ECAP thresholds fell by 17-34 % from the upper stimulation levels of ESRT-based maps across the electrodes. This study's findings have significant implications for programming cochlear implants in paediatric patients. For children who are unable to cooperate during ESRT measurements, or in cases where ESRT cannot be elicited, ECAP measurements offer a viable alternative. ECAP-based estimates can be used to set MCL levels that closely approximate those derived from ESRT, ensuring appropriate stimulation levels for these young children using cochlear implants.</p>","PeriodicalId":14388,"journal":{"name":"International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology","volume":"188 ","pages":"112194"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.112194","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies have reported a varied correlation strength between the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) and electrically evoked stapedial reflex thresholds (ESRT) in cochlear implant recipients. However, there is a lack of information on the relationship between the two measures in paediatric cochlear implant users. This study was aimed to compare the ESRT and ECAP measures and determine where ECAP thresholds fall within the dynamic range of ESRT-based Maps in paediatric cochlear implant users. The study involved 40 children aged between 3 and 6 years and were implanted with MedEL cochlear implant device unilaterally. ESRT and ECAP thresholds were measured for all twelve electrodes during the same mapping session, three months after cochlear implant activation. The results revealed significant differences between ECAP and ESRT thresholds across all electrodes. A significant moderate correlation between ESRT and ECAP thresholds was observed on all electrodes. The ECAP thresholds could predict the ESRT based Most comfortable levels (MCLs) significantly. Notably, ECAP thresholds fell by 17-34 % from the upper stimulation levels of ESRT-based maps across the electrodes. This study's findings have significant implications for programming cochlear implants in paediatric patients. For children who are unable to cooperate during ESRT measurements, or in cases where ESRT cannot be elicited, ECAP measurements offer a viable alternative. ECAP-based estimates can be used to set MCL levels that closely approximate those derived from ESRT, ensuring appropriate stimulation levels for these young children using cochlear implants.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从 ECAP 阈值预测儿科人工耳蜗用户最舒适的 ESRT 聆听水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
276
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of the International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology is to concentrate and disseminate information concerning prevention, cure and care of otorhinolaryngological disorders in infants and children due to developmental, degenerative, infectious, neoplastic, traumatic, social, psychiatric and economic causes. The Journal provides a medium for clinical and basic contributions in all of the areas of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. This includes medical and surgical otology, bronchoesophagology, laryngology, rhinology, diseases of the head and neck, and disorders of communication, including voice, speech and language disorders.
期刊最新文献
Radio-clinical assessment of crista fenestra during pediatric cochlear implantation. Acute mastoiditis: 30 years review in a tertiary hospital. Pediatric cochlear implantation in otitis media with effusion: Are ventilation tubes truly necessary? Improve the behavioral auditory attention training effects on the Speech-In-Noise perception with simultaneous electrical stimulation in children with hearing loss: A randomized clinical trial. Corrigendum to "A review of the importance of top-down processing assessment in auditory processing disorder" [Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 186, (November 2024), 112128].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1