Exploring pre-diagnosis hospital contacts in women with endometriosis using ICD-10: a Danish case-control study.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Human reproduction Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1093/humrep/deae273
Anna Melgaard, Claus Høstrup Vestergaard, Ulrik Schiøler Kesmodel, Bettina Wulff Risør, Axel Forman, Krina T Zondervan, Mintu Nath, Dolapo Ayansina, Philippa T K Saunders, Andrew W Horne, Lucky Saraswat, Dorte Rytter
{"title":"Exploring pre-diagnosis hospital contacts in women with endometriosis using ICD-10: a Danish case-control study.","authors":"Anna Melgaard, Claus Høstrup Vestergaard, Ulrik Schiøler Kesmodel, Bettina Wulff Risør, Axel Forman, Krina T Zondervan, Mintu Nath, Dolapo Ayansina, Philippa T K Saunders, Andrew W Horne, Lucky Saraswat, Dorte Rytter","doi":"10.1093/humrep/deae273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study question: </strong>How does pre-diagnosis use of hospital care differentiate between women later diagnosed with endometriosis and age-matched controls without a diagnosis?</p><p><strong>Summary answer: </strong>Women with hospital-diagnosed endometriosis had more frequent hospital contacts in the 10 years leading up to the diagnosis compared to women without a diagnosis of endometriosis, and the contacts were related to registered diagnoses in nearly all of the included ICD-10 chapters for the entire period.</p><p><strong>What is known already: </strong>Only a few studies have investigated the utilization of health care among women with endometriosis in the time before diagnosis, but current research shows that women with endometriosis have a higher utilization compared to women without diagnosed endometriosis. To our knowledge, no study has investigated the type of contact related to the higher utilization by using the ICD-10 diagnoses registered to the hospital contact.</p><p><strong>Study design, size, duration: </strong>This study was conducted as a national Danish registry-based case-control study of 129 696 women. Cases were women with a first-time hospital-based diagnosis of endometriosis between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2017.</p><p><strong>Participants/materials, setting, methods: </strong>Using density sampling, we identified 21 616 cases. Each case was matched on age at the date of diagnosis (index date) to five women without hospital-diagnosed endometriosis (n = 108 080) at the time of matching. The utilization and registered ICD-10 diagnoses related to the hospital contact were included for the 10 years before the index date.</p><p><strong>Main results and the role of chance: </strong>The probability of having a high number of hospital contacts (six or more) was more common among women with endometriosis (68.6%) compared to women without endometriosis (55.7%) In general, women without endometriosis were more likely to have fewer than six contacts. The diagnoses registered to the contact among cases were related to a greater variety of ICD-10 chapters when compared to controls with the same number of contacts. For nearly all of the included ICD-10 chapters, women with endometriosis were more likely to have a diagnosis over the entire period compared to controls, with the only exception being in the chapter related to pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Limitations, reasons for caution: </strong>Our results are only applicable for women with hospital-based diagnosed endometriosis since we were not able to include women diagnosed at the general practitioner or private gynecologists. We were not able to make a causal interpretation, as we do not have information on the onset of symptoms of the included diseases. The association may be overestimated due to detection bias. However, a sensitivity analysis only changed the results slightly, indicating a low risk of this bias.</p><p><strong>Wider implications of the findings: </strong>This study is in accordance with previous studies on the subject, indicating that the utilization of health care prior to endometriosis is not necessarily restricted to endometriosis-related symptoms and that endometriosis can be associated with many other diseases. Future studies may explore hospital contacts and causes/diagnoses following the endometriosis diagnosis to further shed light on whether our results are due to a pattern of multiple pathologies or rather an expression of misdiagnoses among women with endometriosis before diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Study funding/competing interest(s): </strong>This study is supported by grants from the project Finding Endometriosis using Machine Learning (FEMaLe/101017562), which has received funding from The European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program and Helsefonden (21-B-0141). A.W.H. received grant funding from NIHR, CSO, Roche Diagnostics, and Wellbeing of Women. A.W.H.'s institution received consultation fees from Theramex, Joii, Gesynta, and Gedeon Richter. A.W.H.'s institution received honoraria for lectures from Theramex and Gedeon Richter. A.W.H. is listed as co-inventor on a patent application (UK Patent App No. 2217921.2, International Patent App No. PCT/GB2023/053076). P.T.K.S.'s institution (University of Edinburgh) received consultation fees from Gesynta Pharma AB and BenevolentAI Bio Ltd. P.T.K.S's institution (University of Edinburgh) declares a patent application (UK Patent Application No. 2310300.5. Androgens in diagnostic strategies for endometriosis). P.T.K.S. is a treasurer of the World Endometriosis Society, Fellowship in the Royal Society of Edinburgh, and a Scientific Advisor of the Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>N/A.</p>","PeriodicalId":13003,"journal":{"name":"Human reproduction","volume":" ","pages":"280-288"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11788223/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deae273","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study question: How does pre-diagnosis use of hospital care differentiate between women later diagnosed with endometriosis and age-matched controls without a diagnosis?

Summary answer: Women with hospital-diagnosed endometriosis had more frequent hospital contacts in the 10 years leading up to the diagnosis compared to women without a diagnosis of endometriosis, and the contacts were related to registered diagnoses in nearly all of the included ICD-10 chapters for the entire period.

What is known already: Only a few studies have investigated the utilization of health care among women with endometriosis in the time before diagnosis, but current research shows that women with endometriosis have a higher utilization compared to women without diagnosed endometriosis. To our knowledge, no study has investigated the type of contact related to the higher utilization by using the ICD-10 diagnoses registered to the hospital contact.

Study design, size, duration: This study was conducted as a national Danish registry-based case-control study of 129 696 women. Cases were women with a first-time hospital-based diagnosis of endometriosis between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2017.

Participants/materials, setting, methods: Using density sampling, we identified 21 616 cases. Each case was matched on age at the date of diagnosis (index date) to five women without hospital-diagnosed endometriosis (n = 108 080) at the time of matching. The utilization and registered ICD-10 diagnoses related to the hospital contact were included for the 10 years before the index date.

Main results and the role of chance: The probability of having a high number of hospital contacts (six or more) was more common among women with endometriosis (68.6%) compared to women without endometriosis (55.7%) In general, women without endometriosis were more likely to have fewer than six contacts. The diagnoses registered to the contact among cases were related to a greater variety of ICD-10 chapters when compared to controls with the same number of contacts. For nearly all of the included ICD-10 chapters, women with endometriosis were more likely to have a diagnosis over the entire period compared to controls, with the only exception being in the chapter related to pregnancy.

Limitations, reasons for caution: Our results are only applicable for women with hospital-based diagnosed endometriosis since we were not able to include women diagnosed at the general practitioner or private gynecologists. We were not able to make a causal interpretation, as we do not have information on the onset of symptoms of the included diseases. The association may be overestimated due to detection bias. However, a sensitivity analysis only changed the results slightly, indicating a low risk of this bias.

Wider implications of the findings: This study is in accordance with previous studies on the subject, indicating that the utilization of health care prior to endometriosis is not necessarily restricted to endometriosis-related symptoms and that endometriosis can be associated with many other diseases. Future studies may explore hospital contacts and causes/diagnoses following the endometriosis diagnosis to further shed light on whether our results are due to a pattern of multiple pathologies or rather an expression of misdiagnoses among women with endometriosis before diagnosis.

Study funding/competing interest(s): This study is supported by grants from the project Finding Endometriosis using Machine Learning (FEMaLe/101017562), which has received funding from The European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program and Helsefonden (21-B-0141). A.W.H. received grant funding from NIHR, CSO, Roche Diagnostics, and Wellbeing of Women. A.W.H.'s institution received consultation fees from Theramex, Joii, Gesynta, and Gedeon Richter. A.W.H.'s institution received honoraria for lectures from Theramex and Gedeon Richter. A.W.H. is listed as co-inventor on a patent application (UK Patent App No. 2217921.2, International Patent App No. PCT/GB2023/053076). P.T.K.S.'s institution (University of Edinburgh) received consultation fees from Gesynta Pharma AB and BenevolentAI Bio Ltd. P.T.K.S's institution (University of Edinburgh) declares a patent application (UK Patent Application No. 2310300.5. Androgens in diagnostic strategies for endometriosis). P.T.K.S. is a treasurer of the World Endometriosis Society, Fellowship in the Royal Society of Edinburgh, and a Scientific Advisor of the Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

Trial registration number: N/A.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用ICD-10探讨子宫内膜异位症妇女诊断前的医院接触:丹麦病例对照研究
研究问题:诊断前使用医院护理如何区分后来诊断为子宫内膜异位症的妇女和未诊断的年龄匹配的对照组?概要回答:在诊断出子宫内膜异位症之前的10年里,与没有诊断出子宫内膜异位症的女性相比,患有子宫内膜异位症的女性与医院的接触更频繁,而且在整个期间,这些接触与ICD-10中几乎所有章节的登记诊断有关。已知情况:只有少数研究调查了诊断前子宫内膜异位症妇女对医疗保健的利用情况,但目前的研究表明,与未诊断为子宫内膜异位症的妇女相比,患有子宫内膜异位症的妇女对医疗保健的利用更高。据我们所知,没有研究调查过使用医院联系人登记的ICD-10诊断与较高利用率相关的接触类型。研究设计、规模、持续时间:本研究是丹麦一项以登记为基础的病例对照研究,纳入1229696名女性。病例为2000年1月1日至2017年12月31日期间首次在医院诊断为子宫内膜异位症的妇女。参与者/材料、环境、方法:采用密度抽样法,共发现21 616例病例。每个病例在诊断日期(索引日期)的年龄与5名在匹配时没有医院诊断的子宫内膜异位症的妇女(n = 108080)相匹配。纳入索引日期前10年与医院接触相关的ICD-10使用情况和登记诊断。主要结果和偶然性的作用:子宫内膜异位症患者(68.6%)与非子宫内膜异位症患者(55.7%)相比,与医院接触次数较多(6次或更多)的可能性更大。总的来说,没有子宫内膜异位症的女性更有可能少于6次接触。与接触人数相同的对照组相比,病例中接触者的诊断与ICD-10章节的多样性更大。在ICD-10的几乎所有章节中,与对照组相比,患有子宫内膜异位症的女性在整个期间更有可能被诊断出来,唯一的例外是与怀孕有关的章节。局限性和谨慎的原因:我们的结果只适用于在医院诊断为子宫内膜异位症的妇女,因为我们不能包括在全科医生或私人妇科医生诊断的妇女。我们无法作出因果解释,因为我们没有关于所包括疾病症状发作的信息。由于检测偏差,这种关联可能被高估。然而,敏感性分析只略微改变了结果,表明这种偏倚的风险很低。研究结果的更广泛意义:这项研究与之前的研究一致,表明子宫内膜异位症前的医疗保健利用并不一定局限于子宫内膜异位症相关症状,子宫内膜异位症可能与许多其他疾病有关。未来的研究可能会探索子宫内膜异位症诊断后的医院联系和原因/诊断,以进一步阐明我们的结果是由于多种病理模式还是更确切地说是子宫内膜异位症女性在诊断前的误诊表达。研究资金/竞争利益:本研究由使用机器学习发现子宫内膜异位症项目(FEMaLe/101017562)资助,该项目已获得欧盟地平线2020研究与创新计划和Helsefonden (21-B-0141)的资助。A.W.H.获得了NIHR、CSO、罗氏诊断和妇女福利组织的资助。A.W.H.该机构从Theramex、Joii、Gesynta和Gedeon Richter那里获得了咨询费。A.W.H.该机构获得了Theramex和Gedeon Richter的讲座酬金。A.W.H.在一项专利申请中被列为共同发明人(英国专利申请号2217921.2,国际专利申请号2217921.2)。PCT / GB2023/053076)。P.T.K.S.英国爱丁堡大学(University of Edinburgh)获得了Gesynta Pharma AB和BenevolentAI Bio Ltd.的咨询费。P.T.K.S的机构(爱丁堡大学)宣布一项专利申请(英国专利申请号2310300.5)。雄激素在子宫内膜异位症诊断策略中的应用。P.T.K.S.是世界子宫内膜异位症协会的财务主管,爱丁堡皇家学会的奖学金,皇家妇产科学院的科学顾问。试验注册号:无。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Human reproduction
Human reproduction 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.60%
发文量
1369
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Human Reproduction features full-length, peer-reviewed papers reporting original research, concise clinical case reports, as well as opinions and debates on topical issues. Papers published cover the clinical science and medical aspects of reproductive physiology, pathology and endocrinology; including andrology, gonad function, gametogenesis, fertilization, embryo development, implantation, early pregnancy, genetics, genetic diagnosis, oncology, infectious disease, surgery, contraception, infertility treatment, psychology, ethics and social issues.
期刊最新文献
The numbers of biopsied cells in routine clinical process of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) do not affect the pregnancy outcomes of embryos Sphingolipids modulate redox signalling during human sperm capacitation. Turner syndrome: fertility, familial clustering, and cancer risk. Estimating the public economic gains in Taiwan from in vitro fertilization (IVF) subsidy changes implemented in 2021. Exploring pre-diagnosis hospital contacts in women with endometriosis using ICD-10: a Danish case-control study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1