Treating early-stage centrally-located non-small cell lung cancer with DCAT-SBRT in centers lacking the VMAT technique: a comprehensive study.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Frontiers in Oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fonc.2024.1431082
Yangyang Huang, Jun Yang, Rui Song, Tingting Qin, Menglin Yang, Yibao Liu
{"title":"Treating early-stage centrally-located non-small cell lung cancer with DCAT-SBRT in centers lacking the VMAT technique: a comprehensive study.","authors":"Yangyang Huang, Jun Yang, Rui Song, Tingting Qin, Menglin Yang, Yibao Liu","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2024.1431082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) may have the highest overall performance for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment of inoperable early-stage NSCLC. However, in centers lacking the VMAT technique, the dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT) technique is potentially the best option for small and rounded NSCLC-SBRT. Therefore, we will comprehensively analyze the advantages of the DCAT versus the other techniques except VMAT in terms of dosimetry, plan complexity, delivery time, γ-passing rates and the interplay effect.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>36 patients with early-stage centrally located NSCLC with PTV volumes < 65 cc were enrolled. All patients were redesigned with 50Gy/5f, and 100% of the prescribed dose was normalized to cover 95% of the PTV. The other two delivery techniques compared to the DCAT technique include 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), which use the same parameters for all three techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The dosimetric parameters of the 3-group plans all met the RTOG 0813 protocol. Unsurprisingly, plan complexity parameters such as segments and MUs were significantly reduced in the DCAT plans by 159.56 and 925.90 compared to the IMRT plans, respectively (all <i>P</i> < 0.001). The delivery time of the DCAT plans was the least of 164.51 s (all <i>P</i> < 0.05). Compared to the IMRT plans, the γ-passing rates were higher in the DCAT plans (<i>P</i> < 0.001), with the most significant difference of 6.01% in the (2%, 1 mm) criteria. As for the interplay effect, the mean dose difference (MDD) in the DCAT plans was as good as the 3DCRT plans at different respiratory amplitudes but better than the IMRT plans (all <i>P</i> < 0.05), and the MDD of DCAT plans did not exceed 3% in all respiratory amplitude.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In centers lacking the VMAT technique, implementing SBRT treatment based on the DCAT technique for inoperable early-stage centrally-located NSCLC patients with PTV volumes < 65 cc achieves better treatment efficiency and delivery accuracy while maintaining the plan quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":12482,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Oncology","volume":"14 ","pages":"1431082"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11655335/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1431082","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) may have the highest overall performance for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment of inoperable early-stage NSCLC. However, in centers lacking the VMAT technique, the dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT) technique is potentially the best option for small and rounded NSCLC-SBRT. Therefore, we will comprehensively analyze the advantages of the DCAT versus the other techniques except VMAT in terms of dosimetry, plan complexity, delivery time, γ-passing rates and the interplay effect.

Methods: 36 patients with early-stage centrally located NSCLC with PTV volumes < 65 cc were enrolled. All patients were redesigned with 50Gy/5f, and 100% of the prescribed dose was normalized to cover 95% of the PTV. The other two delivery techniques compared to the DCAT technique include 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), which use the same parameters for all three techniques.

Results: The dosimetric parameters of the 3-group plans all met the RTOG 0813 protocol. Unsurprisingly, plan complexity parameters such as segments and MUs were significantly reduced in the DCAT plans by 159.56 and 925.90 compared to the IMRT plans, respectively (all P < 0.001). The delivery time of the DCAT plans was the least of 164.51 s (all P < 0.05). Compared to the IMRT plans, the γ-passing rates were higher in the DCAT plans (P < 0.001), with the most significant difference of 6.01% in the (2%, 1 mm) criteria. As for the interplay effect, the mean dose difference (MDD) in the DCAT plans was as good as the 3DCRT plans at different respiratory amplitudes but better than the IMRT plans (all P < 0.05), and the MDD of DCAT plans did not exceed 3% in all respiratory amplitude.

Conclusion: In centers lacking the VMAT technique, implementing SBRT treatment based on the DCAT technique for inoperable early-stage centrally-located NSCLC patients with PTV volumes < 65 cc achieves better treatment efficiency and delivery accuracy while maintaining the plan quality.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在缺乏VMAT技术的中心使用DCAT-SBRT治疗早期中心非小细胞肺癌:一项综合研究
背景:体积调制弧线疗法(VMAT)在立体定向体放疗(SBRT)治疗不能手术的早期非小细胞肺癌中可能具有最高的整体疗效。然而,在缺乏VMAT技术的中心,动态适形弧线治疗(DCAT)技术可能是小而圆的NSCLC-SBRT的最佳选择。因此,我们将综合分析DCAT相对于VMAT以外的其他技术在剂量学、计划复杂性、交付时间、γ-通过率和相互作用效应等方面的优势。方法:36例PTV体积< 65cc的早期中心位置非小细胞肺癌患者入组。所有患者重新设计50Gy/5f剂量,100%的处方剂量归一化,覆盖95%的PTV。与DCAT技术相比,其他两种传递技术包括三维适形放疗(3DCRT)和调强放疗(IMRT),这三种技术使用相同的参数。结果:3组方案的剂量学参数均符合RTOG 0813方案。不出所料,与IMRT计划相比,DCAT计划中的计划复杂性参数(如节段和MUs)分别显著降低了159.56和925.90(均P < 0.001)。DCAT方案分娩时间最少,为164.51 s(均P < 0.05)。与IMRT计划相比,DCAT计划的γ-通过率更高(P < 0.001),其中(2%,1 mm)标准的差异最为显著,为6.01%。相互作用方面,各呼吸幅值下DCAT方案的平均剂量差(MDD)与3DCRT方案相当,优于IMRT方案(均P < 0.05),且各呼吸幅值下DCAT方案的MDD均不超过3%。结论:在缺乏VMAT技术的中心,对PTV体积< 65 cc的早期不能手术的中位NSCLC患者实施基于DCAT技术的SBRT治疗,在保持计划质量的同时,可以获得更好的治疗效率和传递准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Oncology
Frontiers in Oncology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Cancer Research
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
10.60%
发文量
6641
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Imaging and Diagnosis is dedicated to the publication of results from clinical and research studies applied to cancer diagnosis and treatment. The section aims to publish studies from the entire field of cancer imaging: results from routine use of clinical imaging in both radiology and nuclear medicine, results from clinical trials, experimental molecular imaging in humans and small animals, research on new contrast agents in CT, MRI, ultrasound, publication of new technical applications and processing algorithms to improve the standardization of quantitative imaging and image guided interventions for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.
期刊最新文献
Honey and cancer: from traditional medicine to modern adjuvant therapy. Lung adenocarcinoma with KRAS-Q61H: clinicopathologic features, diagnostics, and the evolving treatment landscape. Hydraulic endorectal actuator for prostate radiotherapy reduces variations in motion in a silicone rectal phantom. Post-TPS needle placement planning for robotic-assisted LDR seed brachytherapy. Phyllodes-predominant prostatic stromal sarcoma concurrent with prostate adenocarcinoma: a case report and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1