Globalization of clinical trials in oncology: a worldwide quantitative analysis.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY ESMO Open Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104086
F Izarn, J Henry, S Besle, I Ray-Coquard, J-Y Blay, B Allignet
{"title":"Globalization of clinical trials in oncology: a worldwide quantitative analysis.","authors":"F Izarn, J Henry, S Besle, I Ray-Coquard, J-Y Blay, B Allignet","doi":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Over the past two decades, the globalization of oncology clinical trials has expanded, yet significant disparities persist across countries. This study aimed to evaluate these geographical inequalities, the evolution of trial phases, and the adherence to ethical standards according to the World Bank's income group.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The ClinicalTrials.gov database was searched and recorded in June 2024. We analyzed data from 87 748 oncology clinical trials conducted between 2000 and 2021, across high-income (HICs), upper-middle-income (UMICs), lower-middle-income (LMICs), and low-income countries. Key metrics included trial density, funding sources, registration timing, and trial phase distribution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of oncology trials increased significantly, with a mean absolute annual rise of 266.6 trials, with China currently being the leading site of early- and validation-phase trials. While HICs still present the highest trial densities, UMICs showed a notable increase in early-phase trials, reflecting a shift in research dynamics. However, despite these advances, 76.4% of countries still had no new trials initiated by 2024. Additionally, ethical practices saw improvement from 2005 to 2021 with an increase in pre-commencement registration (from 9.2% to 58%, P < 0.0001), and more validation-phase trials with a survival variable as the primary outcome (from 40% to 59.6%, P < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the growth in oncology clinical trials, significant disparities in trial distribution and access remain, especially in LMICs. Continued investments in research infrastructure and adherence to ethical standards are crucial to ensure that clinical research benefits are equitably distributed, particularly in regions with the greatest need for advanced cancer therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11877,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Open","volume":"10 1","pages":"104086"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11728923/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104086","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Over the past two decades, the globalization of oncology clinical trials has expanded, yet significant disparities persist across countries. This study aimed to evaluate these geographical inequalities, the evolution of trial phases, and the adherence to ethical standards according to the World Bank's income group.

Materials and methods: The ClinicalTrials.gov database was searched and recorded in June 2024. We analyzed data from 87 748 oncology clinical trials conducted between 2000 and 2021, across high-income (HICs), upper-middle-income (UMICs), lower-middle-income (LMICs), and low-income countries. Key metrics included trial density, funding sources, registration timing, and trial phase distribution.

Results: The number of oncology trials increased significantly, with a mean absolute annual rise of 266.6 trials, with China currently being the leading site of early- and validation-phase trials. While HICs still present the highest trial densities, UMICs showed a notable increase in early-phase trials, reflecting a shift in research dynamics. However, despite these advances, 76.4% of countries still had no new trials initiated by 2024. Additionally, ethical practices saw improvement from 2005 to 2021 with an increase in pre-commencement registration (from 9.2% to 58%, P < 0.0001), and more validation-phase trials with a survival variable as the primary outcome (from 40% to 59.6%, P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Despite the growth in oncology clinical trials, significant disparities in trial distribution and access remain, especially in LMICs. Continued investments in research infrastructure and adherence to ethical standards are crucial to ensure that clinical research benefits are equitably distributed, particularly in regions with the greatest need for advanced cancer therapies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肿瘤学临床试验的全球化:全球范围的定量分析。
背景:在过去的二十年中,肿瘤临床试验的全球化已经扩大,但各国之间仍然存在显着差异。本研究旨在评估这些地域不平等、试验阶段的演变以及世界银行收入群体对道德标准的遵守情况。材料和方法:检索并记录于2024年6月ClinicalTrials.gov数据库。我们分析了2000年至2021年间在高收入(HICs)、中高收入(UMICs)、中低收入(LMICs)和低收入国家进行的87748项肿瘤学临床试验的数据。关键指标包括试验密度、资金来源、注册时间和试验阶段分布。结果:肿瘤试验数量显著增加,年平均绝对增长量为266.6项,中国目前是早期和验证期试验的领先地点。虽然HICs仍然是最高的试验密度,但UMICs在早期试验中显示出显着的增加,反映了研究动态的转变。然而,尽管取得了这些进展,但到2024年,仍有76.4%的国家没有启动新的试验。此外,从2005年到2021年,伦理实践有所改善,开始前注册增加(从9.2%增加到58%,P < 0.0001),更多的以生存变量为主要结果的验证阶段试验(从40%增加到59.6%,P < 0.0001)。结论:尽管肿瘤临床试验在增长,但在试验分布和可及性方面仍然存在显著差异,特别是在中低收入国家。对研究基础设施的持续投资和对伦理标准的遵守对于确保临床研究利益的公平分配至关重要,特别是在最需要先进癌症疗法的地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ESMO Open
ESMO Open Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
2.70%
发文量
255
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: ESMO Open is the online-only, open access journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). It is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to sharing high-quality medical research and educational materials from various fields of oncology. The journal specifically focuses on showcasing innovative clinical and translational cancer research. ESMO Open aims to publish a wide range of research articles covering all aspects of oncology, including experimental studies, translational research, diagnostic advancements, and therapeutic approaches. The content of the journal includes original research articles, insightful reviews, thought-provoking editorials, and correspondence. Moreover, the journal warmly welcomes the submission of phase I trials and meta-analyses. It also showcases reviews from significant ESMO conferences and meetings, as well as publishes important position statements on behalf of ESMO. Overall, ESMO Open offers a platform for scientists, clinicians, and researchers in the field of oncology to share their valuable insights and contribute to advancing the understanding and treatment of cancer. The journal serves as a source of up-to-date information and fosters collaboration within the oncology community.
期刊最新文献
Association between DNA damage repair alterations and outcomes to 177Lu-PSMA-617 in advanced prostate cancer. BRCA functional domains associated with high risk of multiple primary tumors and domain-related sensitivity to olaparib: the Prometheus Study. Treatment with infliximab and tacrolimus in steroid-refractory pneumonitis secondary to anti-HER2 therapy. Factors associated with first-to-second-line attrition among patients with metastatic breast cancer in the real world. Follow-up after first-Line nivOlumab plus ipilimumab in patients with diffuse pleuRal mesotheliomA: a real-world Dutch cohort study-FLORA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1