Association between time to antibiotic and mortality in patients with suspected sepsis in the Emergency Department: post hoc analysis of the 1-BED randomized clinical trial.

IF 4.2 4区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE European Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001212
Anne-Laure Philippon, Soufiane Lebal, Marta Cancella de Abreu, Camille Gerlier, Oscar Mirò, Tabassome Simon, Yonathan Freund
{"title":"Association between time to antibiotic and mortality in patients with suspected sepsis in the Emergency Department: post hoc analysis of the 1-BED randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Anne-Laure Philippon, Soufiane Lebal, Marta Cancella de Abreu, Camille Gerlier, Oscar Mirò, Tabassome Simon, Yonathan Freund","doi":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The impact of early antibiotics on mortality in patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency department (ED) remains debated, particularly in patients with less severe presentations or before infection confirmation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the association between time to antibiotic administration and 28-day in-hospital mortality among patients with suspected sepsis in the ED.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Post hoc analysis of the 1-bundle emergency department trial, a multicenter, stepped-wedge cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted in 23 EDs in France and Spain. A total of 872 patients with suspected sepsis were included between June 2022 and September 2023. All patients with available data on antibiotic administration were analyzed, and a subgroup of patients with no hypotension was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Time to antibiotic administration. The effect of time to fluid resuscitation was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality at 28 days. Secondary outcomes included all-cause 28-day mortality, ICU length of stay, number of days without vasopressors at day 28, and change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score at 72 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 872 patients (mean age 66 years; 41% female), 859 had available data on antibiotic administration (primary analysis) and 791 (92%) received antibiotics. The median time to antibiotic administration was 61 min (IQR 14-169), with 457 patients (58%) receiving antibiotics within 1 h. In-hospital mortality at 28 days was 14.7% for patients who did not received antibiotic within 1 h versus 9.6% for patients who did [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.00 (1.24-3.23)]. There was an aOR of 1.06 (1.02-1.1) for each hour of delay for antibiotic administration. This effect was confirmed in patients without hypotension [aOR 2.02 (1.08-3.76) for patients who received antibiotics beyond 1 h]. Time to fluid resuscitation was not associated with 28-day in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>In patients with suspected sepsis presenting to the ED antibiotic administration beyond 1 h was associated with a two-fold increased 28-day in-hospital mortality. This effect persisted in patients without hypotension.</p>","PeriodicalId":11893,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"109-115"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001212","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: The impact of early antibiotics on mortality in patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency department (ED) remains debated, particularly in patients with less severe presentations or before infection confirmation.

Objective: To evaluate the association between time to antibiotic administration and 28-day in-hospital mortality among patients with suspected sepsis in the ED.

Design, setting, and participants: Post hoc analysis of the 1-bundle emergency department trial, a multicenter, stepped-wedge cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted in 23 EDs in France and Spain. A total of 872 patients with suspected sepsis were included between June 2022 and September 2023. All patients with available data on antibiotic administration were analyzed, and a subgroup of patients with no hypotension was also assessed.

Exposures: Time to antibiotic administration. The effect of time to fluid resuscitation was also assessed.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality at 28 days. Secondary outcomes included all-cause 28-day mortality, ICU length of stay, number of days without vasopressors at day 28, and change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score at 72 h.

Results: Among 872 patients (mean age 66 years; 41% female), 859 had available data on antibiotic administration (primary analysis) and 791 (92%) received antibiotics. The median time to antibiotic administration was 61 min (IQR 14-169), with 457 patients (58%) receiving antibiotics within 1 h. In-hospital mortality at 28 days was 14.7% for patients who did not received antibiotic within 1 h versus 9.6% for patients who did [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.00 (1.24-3.23)]. There was an aOR of 1.06 (1.02-1.1) for each hour of delay for antibiotic administration. This effect was confirmed in patients without hypotension [aOR 2.02 (1.08-3.76) for patients who received antibiotics beyond 1 h]. Time to fluid resuscitation was not associated with 28-day in-hospital mortality.

Conclusion and relevance: In patients with suspected sepsis presenting to the ED antibiotic administration beyond 1 h was associated with a two-fold increased 28-day in-hospital mortality. This effect persisted in patients without hypotension.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科疑似脓毒症患者使用抗生素时间与死亡率之间的关系:1-BED随机临床试验的事后分析
重要性:早期抗生素对急诊科(ED)疑似脓毒症患者死亡率的影响仍存在争议,特别是在症状较轻或未确诊感染的患者中。目的:评估急诊科疑似脓毒症患者使用抗生素的时间与28天住院死亡率之间的关系。设计、环境和参与者:对法国和西班牙23个急诊科进行的一项多中心、楔形步进式随机对照试验的1组急诊科试验进行事后分析。在2022年6月至2023年9月期间,共有872名疑似败血症患者被纳入研究。对所有有抗生素使用数据的患者进行分析,并对无低血压的患者进行亚组评估。暴露:使用抗生素的时间。时间对液体复苏的影响也进行了评估。主要结局和指标:主要结局为28天住院死亡率。次要结局包括全因28天死亡率、ICU住院时间、第28天未使用血管加压药物的天数和72 h时序贯器官衰竭评估评分的变化。(41%为女性),859人有抗生素给药数据(初步分析),791人(92%)接受了抗生素治疗。给予抗生素的中位时间为61分钟(IQR 14-169), 457例患者(58%)在1小时内接受抗生素治疗。1小时内未接受抗生素治疗的患者28天住院死亡率为14.7%,而接受抗生素治疗的患者为9.6%[调整优势比(aOR) 2.00(1.24-3.23)]。延迟给药1 h的aOR为1.06(1.02 ~ 1.1)。在没有低血压的患者中也证实了这种效果[使用抗生素超过1 h的患者的aOR为2.02(1.08-3.76)]。液体复苏时间与28天住院死亡率无关。结论和相关性:在ED就诊的疑似脓毒症患者中,抗生素使用超过1小时与28天住院死亡率增加两倍相关。这种效果在没有低血压的患者中持续存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
27.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Emergency Medicine is the official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine. It is devoted to serving the European emergency medicine community and to promoting European standards of training, diagnosis and care in this rapidly growing field. Published bimonthly, the Journal offers original papers on all aspects of acute injury and sudden illness, including: emergency medicine, anaesthesiology, cardiology, disaster medicine, intensive care, internal medicine, orthopaedics, paediatrics, toxicology and trauma care. It addresses issues on the organization of emergency services in hospitals and in the community and examines postgraduate training from European and global perspectives. The Journal also publishes papers focusing on the different models of emergency healthcare delivery in Europe and beyond. With a multidisciplinary approach, the European Journal of Emergency Medicine publishes scientific research, topical reviews, news of meetings and events of interest to the emergency medicine community. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. ​
期刊最新文献
Reducing administrative burden in emergency departments using artificial intelligence: a workflow-based analysis. Ventilation feedback devices in cardiopulmonary resuscitation: bridging the gap for optimal resuscitation practices. Effectiveness of venous transillumination on peripheral venous line placement in emergency departments patients with difficult vascular access: a multicentre cluster-randomised trial. Rethinking defibrillation: a viewpoint on alternative strategies for refractory ventricular fibrillation. Characteristics and mortality of patients leaving the emergency department without being seen by a physician: a cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1