The effect of stand-alone and additional preoperative video education on patients' knowledge of anaesthesia: A randomised controlled trial.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY European Journal of Anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1097/EJA.0000000000002109
Sander F van den Heuvel, Philip Jonker, Sanne E Hoeks, Sohal Y Ismail, Robert Jan Stolker, Jan-Wiebe H Korstanje
{"title":"The effect of stand-alone and additional preoperative video education on patients' knowledge of anaesthesia: A randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Sander F van den Heuvel, Philip Jonker, Sanne E Hoeks, Sohal Y Ismail, Robert Jan Stolker, Jan-Wiebe H Korstanje","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fully digital preoperative information could save valuable time and resources. However, compared with face to face consultations, equivalent levels of safety, patient satisfaction and participation need to be maintained when using other methods to inform patients. This trial compared knowledge retention between preoperative stand-alone video education and face-to-face education by an anaesthesiologist.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess if video education, alone or combined with face-to-face education, leads to better knowledge retention more than conventional face-to-face education.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A randomised controlled trial with four arms: Video, Anaesthesiologist, Video & Anaesthesiologist, and Reference for baseline measurements and exploration of a test-enhanced learning effect.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A Dutch tertiary care centre from February 2022 to February 2023.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>A total of 767 adult patients undergoing preoperative consultation for elective non-cardiothoracic surgery, with 677 included in the complete case analysis.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Stand-alone preoperative video education and video education in combination with face-to-face education in the preoperative outpatient clinic.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Primary outcome, measured by the Rotterdam Anaesthesia Knowledge Questionnaire, was knowledge retention on day 0. Secondary outcomes included knowledge retention at 14 and 42 days, preoperative anxiety, and the need for additional information using the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale. Other outcomes were satisfaction, self-assessed knowledge, and test-enhanced learning effect.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stand-alone video education led to higher Rotterdam Anaesthesia Knowledge Questionnaire scores than face-to-face education on day 0: median [IQR], 87.5 [81.3 to 93.8] vs. 81.3 [68.8 to 87.5], P < 0.001. Combined education in the \"Video & Anaesthesiologist\" group led to better knowledge retention compared with both the \"Anaesthesiologist\" group and the Video group: 93.8 [87.5 to 93.8] vs. 81.3 [68.8 to 87.5], P < 0.001; 93.8 [87.5 to 93.8] vs. 87.5 [81.3 to 93.8], P = 0.01, respectively. No differences in the patients' preoperative anxiety and satisfaction levels were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with face-to-face education by an anaesthesiologist, stand-alone video and combined video education improve short-term knowledge retention, without increasing patient anxiety.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05188547 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05188547).</p>","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002109","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fully digital preoperative information could save valuable time and resources. However, compared with face to face consultations, equivalent levels of safety, patient satisfaction and participation need to be maintained when using other methods to inform patients. This trial compared knowledge retention between preoperative stand-alone video education and face-to-face education by an anaesthesiologist.

Objectives: To assess if video education, alone or combined with face-to-face education, leads to better knowledge retention more than conventional face-to-face education.

Design: A randomised controlled trial with four arms: Video, Anaesthesiologist, Video & Anaesthesiologist, and Reference for baseline measurements and exploration of a test-enhanced learning effect.

Setting: A Dutch tertiary care centre from February 2022 to February 2023.

Patients: A total of 767 adult patients undergoing preoperative consultation for elective non-cardiothoracic surgery, with 677 included in the complete case analysis.

Interventions: Stand-alone preoperative video education and video education in combination with face-to-face education in the preoperative outpatient clinic.

Main outcome measures: Primary outcome, measured by the Rotterdam Anaesthesia Knowledge Questionnaire, was knowledge retention on day 0. Secondary outcomes included knowledge retention at 14 and 42 days, preoperative anxiety, and the need for additional information using the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale. Other outcomes were satisfaction, self-assessed knowledge, and test-enhanced learning effect.

Results: Stand-alone video education led to higher Rotterdam Anaesthesia Knowledge Questionnaire scores than face-to-face education on day 0: median [IQR], 87.5 [81.3 to 93.8] vs. 81.3 [68.8 to 87.5], P < 0.001. Combined education in the "Video & Anaesthesiologist" group led to better knowledge retention compared with both the "Anaesthesiologist" group and the Video group: 93.8 [87.5 to 93.8] vs. 81.3 [68.8 to 87.5], P < 0.001; 93.8 [87.5 to 93.8] vs. 87.5 [81.3 to 93.8], P = 0.01, respectively. No differences in the patients' preoperative anxiety and satisfaction levels were found.

Conclusion: Compared with face-to-face education by an anaesthesiologist, stand-alone video and combined video education improve short-term knowledge retention, without increasing patient anxiety.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05188547 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05188547).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术前单独和附加视频教育对患者麻醉知识的影响:一项随机对照试验。
背景:术前信息全数字化可以节省宝贵的时间和资源。然而,与面对面咨询相比,在使用其他方法告知患者时,需要保持同等的安全性、患者满意度和参与水平。该试验比较了术前独立视频教育和麻醉师面对面教育的知识保留情况。目的:评估视频教育单独或与面对面教育相结合是否比传统的面对面教育更能提高知识保留。设计:一项随机对照试验,有四组:视频、麻醉师、视频和麻醉师,以及基线测量和探索测试增强学习效果的参考。环境:2022年2月至2023年2月期间,荷兰三级护理中心。患者:共有767名接受择期非心胸手术术前会诊的成年患者,其中677例纳入完整病例分析。干预措施:术前单独视频教学和术前门诊视频教学结合面授。主要结果测量:主要结果,由鹿特丹麻醉知识问卷测量,是第0天的知识保留。次要结果包括14天和42天的知识保留,术前焦虑,以及使用阿姆斯特丹术前焦虑和信息量表对额外信息的需求。其他结果包括满意度、自评知识和应试强化学习效果。结果:独立视频教学导致第0天鹿特丹麻醉知识问卷得分高于面对面教学:中位数[IQR], 87.5 [81.3 ~ 93.8] vs. 81.3 [68.8 ~ 87.5], P结论:与麻醉师面对面教学相比,独立视频和联合视频教育提高了短期知识保留,未增加患者焦虑。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT05188547 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05188547)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
351
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA) publishes original work of high scientific quality in the field of anaesthesiology, pain, emergency medicine and intensive care. Preference is given to experimental work or clinical observation in man, and to laboratory work of clinical relevance. The journal also publishes commissioned reviews by an authority, editorials, invited commentaries, special articles, pro and con debates, and short reports (correspondences, case reports, short reports of clinical studies).
期刊最新文献
Subcostal transversus abdominis plane block for epigastric cardiac pacemaker operation: A randomised controlled trial. Comparison between ultrasound-guided intertransverse process and erector spinae plane blocks for breast cancer surgery: A randomised controlled trial. Postoperative lymphopaenia as a risk factor for postoperative infections in cancer surgery: A prospective multicentre cohort study (the EVALYMPH study). A novel cricoid pressure sensor device enhances the efficacy of oesophageal occlusion during Sellick's manoeuvre: A randomised controlled trial. Co-administration of dexmedetomidine with total intravenous anaesthesia in carotid endarterectomy reduces requirements for propofol and improves haemodynamic stability: A single-centre, prospective, randomised controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1