Patient Organizations' Digital Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review.

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Medical Internet Research Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.2196/58566
Simon Wallraf, Marie-Luise Dierks, Cosima John, Jonas Lander
{"title":"Patient Organizations' Digital Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review.","authors":"Simon Wallraf, Marie-Luise Dierks, Cosima John, Jonas Lander","doi":"10.2196/58566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient organizations (POs) play a crucial role in supporting individuals with health conditions. Their activities range from counseling to support groups to advocacy. The COVID-19 pandemic and its related public health measures prompted rapid digital transformation efforts across multiple sectors, including health care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to explore how POs digitally responded to pandemic-related circumstances, focusing on aspects such as the technologies used, positive outcomes, and challenges encountered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review followed the methodological guidance of the JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute) Scoping Review Methodology Group and adhered to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) reporting guidelines. A systematic search of PubMed, the Web of Science Core Collection, and the WHO (World Health Organization) COVID-19 database, supplemented by a citation search approach, was conducted. The initial search was performed on November 10, 2022, and updated on November 8, 2023. Publications were eligible if they were published after November 30, 2019, and addressed pandemic-related digitalization efforts of POs, defined as nonprofit organizations with a focus on health-related support. A 2-step screening process was used to identify relevant literature. Data were extracted using a standardized table to capture aspects such as digital adaptation activities (eg, types of technologies implemented, positive outcomes, challenges, and facilitating factors) and coded inductively to identify similarities across included publications, and the findings were synthesized narratively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search and its subsequent update yielded 2212 records, with 13 articles included in this review. These articles revealed a range of PO services that were digitally adapted during the pandemic, with videoconferencing software emerging as the most commonly used tool (n=9 articles). The digital adaptation of group-based support activities was the most frequently reported transformation (n=9). Other adaptations included the digitalization of counseling services (n=3) and the delivery of information and education (n=3), including educational workshops, weekly webinars, and the dissemination of information through digital newsletters. While the use of digital formats, particularly for POs' group activities, often increased accessibility by breaking down preexisting barriers (n=5), they also created new barriers for certain groups, such as those lacking digital skills or resources (n=4). Some participants experienced a loss of interpersonal aspects, like a sense of community (n=3). However, further findings suggest that the digital delivery of such group activities preserved essential interpersonal aspects (n=7) and a preference among some participants to continue digital group activities (n=4), suggesting the potential for sustainability of such options post the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The rapid digitalization efforts of POs demonstrate their adaptability and the potential of digital technologies to improve support services, despite some challenges. Future digitalization strategies should focus, among other things, on promoting digital literacy to ensure the accessibility and inclusiveness of digital services.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>OSF Registries, https://osf.io/anvf4.</p>","PeriodicalId":16337,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","volume":"26 ","pages":"e58566"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699494/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/58566","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient organizations (POs) play a crucial role in supporting individuals with health conditions. Their activities range from counseling to support groups to advocacy. The COVID-19 pandemic and its related public health measures prompted rapid digital transformation efforts across multiple sectors, including health care.

Objective: This study aimed to explore how POs digitally responded to pandemic-related circumstances, focusing on aspects such as the technologies used, positive outcomes, and challenges encountered.

Methods: This scoping review followed the methodological guidance of the JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute) Scoping Review Methodology Group and adhered to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) reporting guidelines. A systematic search of PubMed, the Web of Science Core Collection, and the WHO (World Health Organization) COVID-19 database, supplemented by a citation search approach, was conducted. The initial search was performed on November 10, 2022, and updated on November 8, 2023. Publications were eligible if they were published after November 30, 2019, and addressed pandemic-related digitalization efforts of POs, defined as nonprofit organizations with a focus on health-related support. A 2-step screening process was used to identify relevant literature. Data were extracted using a standardized table to capture aspects such as digital adaptation activities (eg, types of technologies implemented, positive outcomes, challenges, and facilitating factors) and coded inductively to identify similarities across included publications, and the findings were synthesized narratively.

Results: The search and its subsequent update yielded 2212 records, with 13 articles included in this review. These articles revealed a range of PO services that were digitally adapted during the pandemic, with videoconferencing software emerging as the most commonly used tool (n=9 articles). The digital adaptation of group-based support activities was the most frequently reported transformation (n=9). Other adaptations included the digitalization of counseling services (n=3) and the delivery of information and education (n=3), including educational workshops, weekly webinars, and the dissemination of information through digital newsletters. While the use of digital formats, particularly for POs' group activities, often increased accessibility by breaking down preexisting barriers (n=5), they also created new barriers for certain groups, such as those lacking digital skills or resources (n=4). Some participants experienced a loss of interpersonal aspects, like a sense of community (n=3). However, further findings suggest that the digital delivery of such group activities preserved essential interpersonal aspects (n=7) and a preference among some participants to continue digital group activities (n=4), suggesting the potential for sustainability of such options post the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusions: The rapid digitalization efforts of POs demonstrate their adaptability and the potential of digital technologies to improve support services, despite some challenges. Future digitalization strategies should focus, among other things, on promoting digital literacy to ensure the accessibility and inclusiveness of digital services.

Trial registration: OSF Registries, https://osf.io/anvf4.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者组织对COVID-19大流行的数字化应对:范围审查。
背景:患者组织(POs)在支持有健康状况的个人方面发挥着至关重要的作用。他们的活动范围从咨询到支持小组再到倡导。2019冠状病毒病大流行及其相关的公共卫生措施促使包括医疗保健在内的多个部门迅速开展数字化转型工作。目的:本研究旨在探讨POs如何以数字方式应对与大流行相关的情况,重点关注使用的技术、积极成果和遇到的挑战等方面。方法:本综述遵循JBI(乔安娜布里格斯研究所)综述方法学小组的方法学指导,并遵循PRISMA-ScR(系统综述和荟萃分析扩展综述的首选报告项目)报告指南。系统检索PubMed、Web of Science核心合集和WHO (World Health Organization) COVID-19数据库,并辅以引文检索方法。最初的搜索于2022年11月10日进行,并于2023年11月8日更新。如果出版物在2019年11月30日之后出版,并且涉及与大流行相关的POs数字化工作,则符合资格,POs被定义为专注于健康相关支持的非营利组织。采用两步筛选方法筛选相关文献。使用标准化表格提取数据,以捕获数字适应活动(例如,实施的技术类型、积极成果、挑战和促进因素)等方面,并对数据进行归纳编码,以确定所包括出版物之间的相似性,并对结果进行综合叙述。结果:检索及其后续更新产生了2212条记录,其中13篇文章被纳入本综述。这些文章揭示了大流行期间数字化调整的一系列PO服务,视频会议软件成为最常用的工具(n=9篇文章)。基于群体的支持活动的数字化适应是最常报道的转变(n=9)。其他调整包括咨询服务的数字化(n=3)和信息和教育的提供(n=3),包括教育研讨会、每周网络研讨会和通过数字通讯传播信息。虽然数字格式的使用,特别是在POs的群体活动中,通常通过打破现有的障碍(n=5)来增加可访问性,但它们也为某些群体创造了新的障碍,例如缺乏数字技能或资源的群体(n=4)。一些参与者经历了人际关系方面的丧失,比如社区意识(n=3)。然而,进一步的研究结果表明,这种小组活动的数字化交付保留了基本的人际关系方面(n=7),一些参与者更倾向于继续进行数字小组活动(n=4),这表明在2019冠状病毒病大流行之后,这种选择可能具有可持续性。结论:尽管存在一些挑战,但POs的快速数字化努力表明了它们的适应性和数字技术改善支持服务的潜力。除其他外,未来数字化战略应侧重于促进数字扫盲,以确保数字服务的可及性和包容性。试验注册:OSF注册中心,https://osf.io/anvf4。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
5.40%
发文量
654
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) is a highly respected publication in the field of health informatics and health services. With a founding date in 1999, JMIR has been a pioneer in the field for over two decades. As a leader in the industry, the journal focuses on digital health, data science, health informatics, and emerging technologies for health, medicine, and biomedical research. It is recognized as a top publication in these disciplines, ranking in the first quartile (Q1) by Impact Factor. Notably, JMIR holds the prestigious position of being ranked #1 on Google Scholar within the "Medical Informatics" discipline.
期刊最新文献
The Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Classifying Molecular Markers in Adult-Type Gliomas Using Histopathological Images: Systematic Review. Effect of a Digital-Driven Physician-Pharmacist Collaborative Model for Diabetes in Primary Health Care: Cluster Randomized Trial. Creation of EmpowerMe Website to Promote Self-Efficacy in Survivors of Stroke: Co-Design Study. Associations Between Short-Video Platform Use and Health Across Health Distribution and Usage Behaviors in China: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study. Analysis of Multilevel Factors Mobilizing the Spectrum of Interorganizational Knowledge Sharing for Facilitating Digital Transformation at Scale: Qualitative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1