Simon Wallraf, Marie-Luise Dierks, Cosima John, Jonas Lander
{"title":"Patient Organizations' Digital Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review.","authors":"Simon Wallraf, Marie-Luise Dierks, Cosima John, Jonas Lander","doi":"10.2196/58566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient organizations (POs) play a crucial role in supporting individuals with health conditions. Their activities range from counseling to support groups to advocacy. The COVID-19 pandemic and its related public health measures prompted rapid digital transformation efforts across multiple sectors, including health care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to explore how POs digitally responded to pandemic-related circumstances, focusing on aspects such as the technologies used, positive outcomes, and challenges encountered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review followed the methodological guidance of the JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute) Scoping Review Methodology Group and adhered to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) reporting guidelines. A systematic search of PubMed, the Web of Science Core Collection, and the WHO (World Health Organization) COVID-19 database, supplemented by a citation search approach, was conducted. The initial search was performed on November 10, 2022, and updated on November 8, 2023. Publications were eligible if they were published after November 30, 2019, and addressed pandemic-related digitalization efforts of POs, defined as nonprofit organizations with a focus on health-related support. A 2-step screening process was used to identify relevant literature. Data were extracted using a standardized table to capture aspects such as digital adaptation activities (eg, types of technologies implemented, positive outcomes, challenges, and facilitating factors) and coded inductively to identify similarities across included publications, and the findings were synthesized narratively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search and its subsequent update yielded 2212 records, with 13 articles included in this review. These articles revealed a range of PO services that were digitally adapted during the pandemic, with videoconferencing software emerging as the most commonly used tool (n=9 articles). The digital adaptation of group-based support activities was the most frequently reported transformation (n=9). Other adaptations included the digitalization of counseling services (n=3) and the delivery of information and education (n=3), including educational workshops, weekly webinars, and the dissemination of information through digital newsletters. While the use of digital formats, particularly for POs' group activities, often increased accessibility by breaking down preexisting barriers (n=5), they also created new barriers for certain groups, such as those lacking digital skills or resources (n=4). Some participants experienced a loss of interpersonal aspects, like a sense of community (n=3). However, further findings suggest that the digital delivery of such group activities preserved essential interpersonal aspects (n=7) and a preference among some participants to continue digital group activities (n=4), suggesting the potential for sustainability of such options post the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The rapid digitalization efforts of POs demonstrate their adaptability and the potential of digital technologies to improve support services, despite some challenges. Future digitalization strategies should focus, among other things, on promoting digital literacy to ensure the accessibility and inclusiveness of digital services.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>OSF Registries, https://osf.io/anvf4.</p>","PeriodicalId":16337,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","volume":"26 ","pages":"e58566"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699494/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/58566","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Patient organizations (POs) play a crucial role in supporting individuals with health conditions. Their activities range from counseling to support groups to advocacy. The COVID-19 pandemic and its related public health measures prompted rapid digital transformation efforts across multiple sectors, including health care.
Objective: This study aimed to explore how POs digitally responded to pandemic-related circumstances, focusing on aspects such as the technologies used, positive outcomes, and challenges encountered.
Methods: This scoping review followed the methodological guidance of the JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute) Scoping Review Methodology Group and adhered to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) reporting guidelines. A systematic search of PubMed, the Web of Science Core Collection, and the WHO (World Health Organization) COVID-19 database, supplemented by a citation search approach, was conducted. The initial search was performed on November 10, 2022, and updated on November 8, 2023. Publications were eligible if they were published after November 30, 2019, and addressed pandemic-related digitalization efforts of POs, defined as nonprofit organizations with a focus on health-related support. A 2-step screening process was used to identify relevant literature. Data were extracted using a standardized table to capture aspects such as digital adaptation activities (eg, types of technologies implemented, positive outcomes, challenges, and facilitating factors) and coded inductively to identify similarities across included publications, and the findings were synthesized narratively.
Results: The search and its subsequent update yielded 2212 records, with 13 articles included in this review. These articles revealed a range of PO services that were digitally adapted during the pandemic, with videoconferencing software emerging as the most commonly used tool (n=9 articles). The digital adaptation of group-based support activities was the most frequently reported transformation (n=9). Other adaptations included the digitalization of counseling services (n=3) and the delivery of information and education (n=3), including educational workshops, weekly webinars, and the dissemination of information through digital newsletters. While the use of digital formats, particularly for POs' group activities, often increased accessibility by breaking down preexisting barriers (n=5), they also created new barriers for certain groups, such as those lacking digital skills or resources (n=4). Some participants experienced a loss of interpersonal aspects, like a sense of community (n=3). However, further findings suggest that the digital delivery of such group activities preserved essential interpersonal aspects (n=7) and a preference among some participants to continue digital group activities (n=4), suggesting the potential for sustainability of such options post the COVID-19 pandemic.
Conclusions: The rapid digitalization efforts of POs demonstrate their adaptability and the potential of digital technologies to improve support services, despite some challenges. Future digitalization strategies should focus, among other things, on promoting digital literacy to ensure the accessibility and inclusiveness of digital services.
背景:患者组织(POs)在支持有健康状况的个人方面发挥着至关重要的作用。他们的活动范围从咨询到支持小组再到倡导。2019冠状病毒病大流行及其相关的公共卫生措施促使包括医疗保健在内的多个部门迅速开展数字化转型工作。目的:本研究旨在探讨POs如何以数字方式应对与大流行相关的情况,重点关注使用的技术、积极成果和遇到的挑战等方面。方法:本综述遵循JBI(乔安娜布里格斯研究所)综述方法学小组的方法学指导,并遵循PRISMA-ScR(系统综述和荟萃分析扩展综述的首选报告项目)报告指南。系统检索PubMed、Web of Science核心合集和WHO (World Health Organization) COVID-19数据库,并辅以引文检索方法。最初的搜索于2022年11月10日进行,并于2023年11月8日更新。如果出版物在2019年11月30日之后出版,并且涉及与大流行相关的POs数字化工作,则符合资格,POs被定义为专注于健康相关支持的非营利组织。采用两步筛选方法筛选相关文献。使用标准化表格提取数据,以捕获数字适应活动(例如,实施的技术类型、积极成果、挑战和促进因素)等方面,并对数据进行归纳编码,以确定所包括出版物之间的相似性,并对结果进行综合叙述。结果:检索及其后续更新产生了2212条记录,其中13篇文章被纳入本综述。这些文章揭示了大流行期间数字化调整的一系列PO服务,视频会议软件成为最常用的工具(n=9篇文章)。基于群体的支持活动的数字化适应是最常报道的转变(n=9)。其他调整包括咨询服务的数字化(n=3)和信息和教育的提供(n=3),包括教育研讨会、每周网络研讨会和通过数字通讯传播信息。虽然数字格式的使用,特别是在POs的群体活动中,通常通过打破现有的障碍(n=5)来增加可访问性,但它们也为某些群体创造了新的障碍,例如缺乏数字技能或资源的群体(n=4)。一些参与者经历了人际关系方面的丧失,比如社区意识(n=3)。然而,进一步的研究结果表明,这种小组活动的数字化交付保留了基本的人际关系方面(n=7),一些参与者更倾向于继续进行数字小组活动(n=4),这表明在2019冠状病毒病大流行之后,这种选择可能具有可持续性。结论:尽管存在一些挑战,但POs的快速数字化努力表明了它们的适应性和数字技术改善支持服务的潜力。除其他外,未来数字化战略应侧重于促进数字扫盲,以确保数字服务的可及性和包容性。试验注册:OSF注册中心,https://osf.io/anvf4。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) is a highly respected publication in the field of health informatics and health services. With a founding date in 1999, JMIR has been a pioneer in the field for over two decades.
As a leader in the industry, the journal focuses on digital health, data science, health informatics, and emerging technologies for health, medicine, and biomedical research. It is recognized as a top publication in these disciplines, ranking in the first quartile (Q1) by Impact Factor.
Notably, JMIR holds the prestigious position of being ranked #1 on Google Scholar within the "Medical Informatics" discipline.