Calibration and volunteer testing of a prototype contactless respiratory motion detection system based on laser tracking.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1002/acm2.14607
Isnaini Nur Islami, Amar Ma'ruf Irfan Muhamadi, Wahyu Edy Wibowo, Aloysius Mario Yudi Putranto, Arief Sudarmaji, Fielda Djuita, Supriyanto Ardjo Pawiro
{"title":"Calibration and volunteer testing of a prototype contactless respiratory motion detection system based on laser tracking.","authors":"Isnaini Nur Islami, Amar Ma'ruf Irfan Muhamadi, Wahyu Edy Wibowo, Aloysius Mario Yudi Putranto, Arief Sudarmaji, Fielda Djuita, Supriyanto Ardjo Pawiro","doi":"10.1002/acm2.14607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The goal of this study was to assess the feasibility of a cost-effective prototype of a laser-based respiratory motion detection system utilizing a Leuze LDS for breath monitoring through calibration and volunteer tests.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was performed using the Anzai AZ-773 V and computerized imaging reference systems (CIRS) motion phantoms for calibration tests. The calibration of the laser-based respiratory motion detection system involved spatial accuracy testing, amplitude calibration, and temporal accuracy. Volunteer testing was conducted on eight volunteers at the inferior end of the sternum and the abdomen area. The accuracy of the data recorded by the laser-based respiratory motion detection system was validated against established clinical reference tracking systems namely real-time position management (RPM) and Anzai AZ-733 V system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Calibration with an Anzai AZ-773 V and CIRS phantoms demonstrated an average error of 1.17% ± 0.64% and an average amplitude calibration correlation coefficient of 0.975 ± 0.004. Volunteer tests, compared to the Anzai AZ-733 V clinical system and RPM system, revealed average correlation coefficients for deep inspiration breath-hold are 0.931 ± 0.02 and 0.936 ± 0.03, respectively, and for free breathing are 0.85 ± 0.07 and 0.77 ± 0.1, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the data suggest that the in-house laser-based respiratory motion detection system performed well, with an error percentage below 10%. A reasonably good correlation coefficient was obtained, indicating that the readings obtained from the laser system are consistent with those set on the phantom and clinical respiratory motion detection systems. Although promising through the calibration process and volunteer tests, further studies are required to generate trigger data linked directly to computerized tomography and linear accelerator facilities, thereby advancing the clinical viability of this innovative laser-based respiratory motion detection system.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e14607"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14607","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The goal of this study was to assess the feasibility of a cost-effective prototype of a laser-based respiratory motion detection system utilizing a Leuze LDS for breath monitoring through calibration and volunteer tests.

Methods: This study was performed using the Anzai AZ-773 V and computerized imaging reference systems (CIRS) motion phantoms for calibration tests. The calibration of the laser-based respiratory motion detection system involved spatial accuracy testing, amplitude calibration, and temporal accuracy. Volunteer testing was conducted on eight volunteers at the inferior end of the sternum and the abdomen area. The accuracy of the data recorded by the laser-based respiratory motion detection system was validated against established clinical reference tracking systems namely real-time position management (RPM) and Anzai AZ-733 V system.

Results: Calibration with an Anzai AZ-773 V and CIRS phantoms demonstrated an average error of 1.17% ± 0.64% and an average amplitude calibration correlation coefficient of 0.975 ± 0.004. Volunteer tests, compared to the Anzai AZ-733 V clinical system and RPM system, revealed average correlation coefficients for deep inspiration breath-hold are 0.931 ± 0.02 and 0.936 ± 0.03, respectively, and for free breathing are 0.85 ± 0.07 and 0.77 ± 0.1, respectively.

Conclusions: Overall, the data suggest that the in-house laser-based respiratory motion detection system performed well, with an error percentage below 10%. A reasonably good correlation coefficient was obtained, indicating that the readings obtained from the laser system are consistent with those set on the phantom and clinical respiratory motion detection systems. Although promising through the calibration process and volunteer tests, further studies are required to generate trigger data linked directly to computerized tomography and linear accelerator facilities, thereby advancing the clinical viability of this innovative laser-based respiratory motion detection system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
期刊最新文献
Calibration and volunteer testing of a prototype contactless respiratory motion detection system based on laser tracking. Development and application of a novel scintillation gel-based 3D dosimetry system for radiotherapy. Hypoxia-guided treatment planning for lung cancer with dose painting by numbers. Machine learning based radiomics model to predict radiotherapy induced cardiotoxicity in breast cancer. Optimization of target grouping in distributive stereotactic radiosurgery using the excel evolutionary solver.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1