Baseline Anal Sphincter Elastance May Predict Long-Term Outcomes of Sacral Neuromodulation for Fecal Incontinence.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of Surgical Research Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2024.11.012
Alexander O'Connor, Sarah Martin, Matthew Davenport, Niels Klarskov, Abhiram Sharma, John McLaughlin, Dipesh H Vasant, Edward S Kiff, Karen J Telford
{"title":"Baseline Anal Sphincter Elastance May Predict Long-Term Outcomes of Sacral Neuromodulation for Fecal Incontinence.","authors":"Alexander O'Connor, Sarah Martin, Matthew Davenport, Niels Klarskov, Abhiram Sharma, John McLaughlin, Dipesh H Vasant, Edward S Kiff, Karen J Telford","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2024.11.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anal acoustic reflectometry (AAR), a novel test of anal sphincter function, was shown to predict a successful trial phase of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) for fecal incontinence. This follow-up study aims to explore if AAR can also predict short- and long-term SNM outcomes at less than and more than 5 y, respectively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Outcome data were reviewed from a prospectively managed database. Successful treatment was defined as >50% improvement in patient reported fecal incontinence or urgency episodes, or in a symptom severity score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six female patients (median: 53 y [range 31-80]) who received a permanent SNM implant were analyzed. In the short-term, no differences were observed in baseline AAR and symptom severity parameters between patients reporting success or failure. At long-term follow-up (median: 122 mo [113-138]) data was available from 17 (17/26, 65%) patients with 7 (7/17, 41%) reporting continued treatment success. Baseline fecal urgency episodes (P = 0.003), and the AAR parameters of opening elastance (P = 0.043) and squeeze opening elastance (P = 0.025) were significantly different between patients reporting success and those reporting failure. Squeeze opening elastance demonstrated the greatest ability to discriminate between success and failure (area under the curve: 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.60-1.01, P = 0.003)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AAR may have a role in identifying patients suitable for SNM treatment with clinically relevant metrics associated with successful response to treatment. Future work should explore this further to improve SNM patient selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"305 ","pages":"183-189"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.11.012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Anal acoustic reflectometry (AAR), a novel test of anal sphincter function, was shown to predict a successful trial phase of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) for fecal incontinence. This follow-up study aims to explore if AAR can also predict short- and long-term SNM outcomes at less than and more than 5 y, respectively.

Methods: Outcome data were reviewed from a prospectively managed database. Successful treatment was defined as >50% improvement in patient reported fecal incontinence or urgency episodes, or in a symptom severity score.

Results: Twenty-six female patients (median: 53 y [range 31-80]) who received a permanent SNM implant were analyzed. In the short-term, no differences were observed in baseline AAR and symptom severity parameters between patients reporting success or failure. At long-term follow-up (median: 122 mo [113-138]) data was available from 17 (17/26, 65%) patients with 7 (7/17, 41%) reporting continued treatment success. Baseline fecal urgency episodes (P = 0.003), and the AAR parameters of opening elastance (P = 0.043) and squeeze opening elastance (P = 0.025) were significantly different between patients reporting success and those reporting failure. Squeeze opening elastance demonstrated the greatest ability to discriminate between success and failure (area under the curve: 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.60-1.01, P = 0.003)).

Conclusions: AAR may have a role in identifying patients suitable for SNM treatment with clinically relevant metrics associated with successful response to treatment. Future work should explore this further to improve SNM patient selection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
期刊最新文献
Alemtuzumab Associated With Higher Mortality Than Basiliximab in Older Kidney Transplant Recipients. Regional Anesthesia and Surgical Volume in Children Undergoing Nuss Repair: A Multicenter Review. Baseline Anal Sphincter Elastance May Predict Long-Term Outcomes of Sacral Neuromodulation for Fecal Incontinence. Delays in Care for Children With Low Anorectal Malformations in Southwestern Uganda. Outcome of Single Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Complex Endovascular Aortic Repair.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1