Alexander O'Connor, Sarah Martin, Matthew Davenport, Niels Klarskov, Abhiram Sharma, John McLaughlin, Dipesh H Vasant, Edward S Kiff, Karen J Telford
{"title":"Baseline Anal Sphincter Elastance May Predict Long-Term Outcomes of Sacral Neuromodulation for Fecal Incontinence.","authors":"Alexander O'Connor, Sarah Martin, Matthew Davenport, Niels Klarskov, Abhiram Sharma, John McLaughlin, Dipesh H Vasant, Edward S Kiff, Karen J Telford","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2024.11.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anal acoustic reflectometry (AAR), a novel test of anal sphincter function, was shown to predict a successful trial phase of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) for fecal incontinence. This follow-up study aims to explore if AAR can also predict short- and long-term SNM outcomes at less than and more than 5 y, respectively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Outcome data were reviewed from a prospectively managed database. Successful treatment was defined as >50% improvement in patient reported fecal incontinence or urgency episodes, or in a symptom severity score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six female patients (median: 53 y [range 31-80]) who received a permanent SNM implant were analyzed. In the short-term, no differences were observed in baseline AAR and symptom severity parameters between patients reporting success or failure. At long-term follow-up (median: 122 mo [113-138]) data was available from 17 (17/26, 65%) patients with 7 (7/17, 41%) reporting continued treatment success. Baseline fecal urgency episodes (P = 0.003), and the AAR parameters of opening elastance (P = 0.043) and squeeze opening elastance (P = 0.025) were significantly different between patients reporting success and those reporting failure. Squeeze opening elastance demonstrated the greatest ability to discriminate between success and failure (area under the curve: 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.60-1.01, P = 0.003)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AAR may have a role in identifying patients suitable for SNM treatment with clinically relevant metrics associated with successful response to treatment. Future work should explore this further to improve SNM patient selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"305 ","pages":"183-189"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.11.012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Anal acoustic reflectometry (AAR), a novel test of anal sphincter function, was shown to predict a successful trial phase of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) for fecal incontinence. This follow-up study aims to explore if AAR can also predict short- and long-term SNM outcomes at less than and more than 5 y, respectively.
Methods: Outcome data were reviewed from a prospectively managed database. Successful treatment was defined as >50% improvement in patient reported fecal incontinence or urgency episodes, or in a symptom severity score.
Results: Twenty-six female patients (median: 53 y [range 31-80]) who received a permanent SNM implant were analyzed. In the short-term, no differences were observed in baseline AAR and symptom severity parameters between patients reporting success or failure. At long-term follow-up (median: 122 mo [113-138]) data was available from 17 (17/26, 65%) patients with 7 (7/17, 41%) reporting continued treatment success. Baseline fecal urgency episodes (P = 0.003), and the AAR parameters of opening elastance (P = 0.043) and squeeze opening elastance (P = 0.025) were significantly different between patients reporting success and those reporting failure. Squeeze opening elastance demonstrated the greatest ability to discriminate between success and failure (area under the curve: 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.60-1.01, P = 0.003)).
Conclusions: AAR may have a role in identifying patients suitable for SNM treatment with clinically relevant metrics associated with successful response to treatment. Future work should explore this further to improve SNM patient selection.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories.
The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.