Nurse Practitioner and Physician Collaboration in the Long-Term Care Setting: Secondary Analysis of a Scoping Review.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of the American Medical Directors Association Pub Date : 2024-12-27 DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105418
Lynn Haslam-Larmer, Alexandra Krassikova, Elizabeth Wojtowicz, Shirin Vellani, Sid Feldman, Paul Katz, Benoit Robert, Carrie Heer, Ruth Martin-Misener, Kathryn May, Katherine S McGilton
{"title":"Nurse Practitioner and Physician Collaboration in the Long-Term Care Setting: Secondary Analysis of a Scoping Review.","authors":"Lynn Haslam-Larmer, Alexandra Krassikova, Elizabeth Wojtowicz, Shirin Vellani, Sid Feldman, Paul Katz, Benoit Robert, Carrie Heer, Ruth Martin-Misener, Kathryn May, Katherine S McGilton","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Over the past decade, the role of nurse practitioners (NPs) in long-term care home (LTCH) settings has significantly expanded. Despite this trend, gaps have been identified in the description of collaborative practices between NPs and physicians in the LTCH sector. This study aimed to characterize the elements of collaboration between NPs and physicians in LTCH settings by applying the \"Structured Collaborative Practice Core Model.\"</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A secondary analysis of a scoping review that focuses on literature where NPs and physicians collaboratively provided care in LTCH settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The initial scoping review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA-ScR guidelines and included 60 peer-reviewed articles. Data relevant to the 7 core elements of the Structured Collaborative Practice Core Model-responsibility and accountability, coordination, communication, cooperation, assertiveness, autonomy, and mutual trust and respect-were extracted and analyzed. We included articles that described at least 1 element in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine articles were included in the secondary analysis. The analysis revealed that coordination (n = 25) and communication (n = 23) were the most frequently reported elements. Coordination was often highlighted through descriptions of care delivery organization and decision-making processes, where NPs provided continuous oversight and referred complex cases to physicians. Effective communication pathways, such as joint rounding and face-to-face meetings, were essential for successful collaboration. In contrast, assertiveness (n = 3) was the least frequently discussed element.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and implications: </strong>Applying the Structured Collaborative Practice Core Model to the existing literature on NP and physician collaboration in LTCH settings underscores the importance of effective coordination and communication. Future work needs to investigate the historical and hierarchical dynamics influencing the relationship. Understanding these elements will inform strategies to optimize collaborative efforts, ultimately improving patient care outcomes in LTCH settings. The unique dynamics of NP and physician care models need to be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":" ","pages":"105418"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105418","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Over the past decade, the role of nurse practitioners (NPs) in long-term care home (LTCH) settings has significantly expanded. Despite this trend, gaps have been identified in the description of collaborative practices between NPs and physicians in the LTCH sector. This study aimed to characterize the elements of collaboration between NPs and physicians in LTCH settings by applying the "Structured Collaborative Practice Core Model."

Design: A secondary analysis of a scoping review that focuses on literature where NPs and physicians collaboratively provided care in LTCH settings.

Methods: The initial scoping review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA-ScR guidelines and included 60 peer-reviewed articles. Data relevant to the 7 core elements of the Structured Collaborative Practice Core Model-responsibility and accountability, coordination, communication, cooperation, assertiveness, autonomy, and mutual trust and respect-were extracted and analyzed. We included articles that described at least 1 element in the analysis.

Results: Twenty-nine articles were included in the secondary analysis. The analysis revealed that coordination (n = 25) and communication (n = 23) were the most frequently reported elements. Coordination was often highlighted through descriptions of care delivery organization and decision-making processes, where NPs provided continuous oversight and referred complex cases to physicians. Effective communication pathways, such as joint rounding and face-to-face meetings, were essential for successful collaboration. In contrast, assertiveness (n = 3) was the least frequently discussed element.

Conclusion and implications: Applying the Structured Collaborative Practice Core Model to the existing literature on NP and physician collaboration in LTCH settings underscores the importance of effective coordination and communication. Future work needs to investigate the historical and hierarchical dynamics influencing the relationship. Understanding these elements will inform strategies to optimize collaborative efforts, ultimately improving patient care outcomes in LTCH settings. The unique dynamics of NP and physician care models need to be considered.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护士执业医师和医师合作在长期护理环境:二次分析的范围审查。
目的:在过去十年中,执业护士(NPs)在长期护理之家(LTCH)环境中的作用显著扩大。尽管存在这一趋势,但在描述长期护理院中护士与医生之间的合作实践方面仍存在差距。本研究旨在通过应用 "结构化协作实践核心模型 "来描述长期护理院中护士与医生之间的协作要素:对范围综述进行二次分析,重点关注护士和医生在LTCH环境中合作提供护理的文献:最初的范围界定综述遵循乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的方法和 PRISMA-ScR 指南,包括 60 篇同行评审文章。我们提取并分析了与结构化协作实践核心模式的 7 个核心要素--责任与问责、协调、沟通、合作、自信、自主以及相互信任与尊重--相关的数据。我们在分析中纳入了至少描述了一个要素的文章:29 篇文章被纳入二次分析。分析表明,协调(25 篇)和沟通(23 篇)是最常报道的要素。协调通常通过描述护理提供组织和决策过程得到强调,其中护士提供持续监督并将复杂病例转介给医生。有效的沟通途径,如联合查房和面对面会议,对成功合作至关重要。相比之下,自信(n = 3)是讨论最少的要素:将结构化协作实践核心模型应用于现有的关于长期住院治疗环境中护士和医生协作的文献中,强调了有效协调和沟通的重要性。未来的工作需要研究影响这种关系的历史和等级动态。了解这些因素将有助于制定优化合作的策略,最终改善长期住院病区的患者护理效果。需要考虑 NP 和医生护理模式的独特动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
472
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates. The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality
期刊最新文献
Medication Use in People Aged 90 Years and Older: A Nationwide Study. Adherence to Guideline Recommendations on Psychotropic Drug Use for Challenging Behavior in Dementia. Quality and Safety Indicators for Care Transitions by Older Adults: A Scoping Review. Experiences of Care Aides Caring for Residents with a History of Psychological Trauma in Long-Term Care Homes (Nursing Homes)-Early Findings. Association between Multimorbidity and End-of-Life Outcomes among Middle-Aged and Older Adults: Evidence from 28 Countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1