Socioeconomic Inequities in Preemptive Kidney Transplantation and Graft Survival: An Innovative Approach to Identifying Disparities in Kidney Transplantation.

IF 1.9 Q3 TRANSPLANTATION Transplantation Direct Pub Date : 2024-12-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1097/TXD.0000000000001734
Sarah Kizilbash, Chung-Ii Wi, Madison Roy, Euijung Ryu, Arthur Matas, Vesna Garovic, Samy Riad, Carrie Schinstock, Young Juhn
{"title":"Socioeconomic Inequities in Preemptive Kidney Transplantation and Graft Survival: An Innovative Approach to Identifying Disparities in Kidney Transplantation.","authors":"Sarah Kizilbash, Chung-Ii Wi, Madison Roy, Euijung Ryu, Arthur Matas, Vesna Garovic, Samy Riad, Carrie Schinstock, Young Juhn","doi":"10.1097/TXD.0000000000001734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The limitations of conventional measures of socioeconomic status (SES) limit our ability to elucidate the role of SES as a key element of social determinants of health in kidney transplantation. This study's objective was to use an innovative SES measure, the HOUsing-based SES measure (HOUSES) index, to examine the effects of social determinants of health on access to and outcomes of kidney transplantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study included residents of Minnesota (age older than 18 y) who underwent kidney transplantation at a single center between 2010 and 2020. SES was determined using the HOUSES index, categorized into quartiles (Q1 for lower, Q2-Q4 for higher SES). We used mixed-effects multivariable logistic and Cox models to examine the effects of HOUSES on preemptive transplants, pretransplant dialysis duration, and death-censored graft loss, adjusting for covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1975 eligible patients, 29.4% received preemptive transplants, 34.9% underwent pretransplant dialysis for >3 y, and 15.1% experienced death-censored graft loss for a median follow-up of 7.15 (interquartile range, 4.25-11.38) y. Lower SES recipients (Q1) demonstrated decreased preemptive transplant likelihood (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-0.97; <i>P</i> = 0.03), longer dialysis duration (>3 y; aOR: 1.43; 95% CI, 1.01-2.03; <i>P</i> = 0.046), and higher death-censored graft loss (adjusted hazard ratio 1.36; 95% CI, 1.02-1.12; <i>P</i> = 0.036) versus higher SES recipients (Q2-Q4).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We observed significant socioeconomic disparities in kidney transplant access, dialysis duration, and graft survival. The HOUSES index may be a promising tool for individual-based targeted interventions as it identifies SES on an individual rather than an area-level basis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23225,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Direct","volume":"11 1","pages":"e1734"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11658720/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Direct","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The limitations of conventional measures of socioeconomic status (SES) limit our ability to elucidate the role of SES as a key element of social determinants of health in kidney transplantation. This study's objective was to use an innovative SES measure, the HOUsing-based SES measure (HOUSES) index, to examine the effects of social determinants of health on access to and outcomes of kidney transplantation.

Methods: Our study included residents of Minnesota (age older than 18 y) who underwent kidney transplantation at a single center between 2010 and 2020. SES was determined using the HOUSES index, categorized into quartiles (Q1 for lower, Q2-Q4 for higher SES). We used mixed-effects multivariable logistic and Cox models to examine the effects of HOUSES on preemptive transplants, pretransplant dialysis duration, and death-censored graft loss, adjusting for covariates.

Results: Among 1975 eligible patients, 29.4% received preemptive transplants, 34.9% underwent pretransplant dialysis for >3 y, and 15.1% experienced death-censored graft loss for a median follow-up of 7.15 (interquartile range, 4.25-11.38) y. Lower SES recipients (Q1) demonstrated decreased preemptive transplant likelihood (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-0.97; P = 0.03), longer dialysis duration (>3 y; aOR: 1.43; 95% CI, 1.01-2.03; P = 0.046), and higher death-censored graft loss (adjusted hazard ratio 1.36; 95% CI, 1.02-1.12; P = 0.036) versus higher SES recipients (Q2-Q4).

Conclusions: We observed significant socioeconomic disparities in kidney transplant access, dialysis duration, and graft survival. The HOUSES index may be a promising tool for individual-based targeted interventions as it identifies SES on an individual rather than an area-level basis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抢先性肾移植和移植物存活中的社会经济不平等:一种识别肾移植差异的创新方法。
背景:传统的社会经济地位(SES)测量方法的局限性限制了我们阐明社会经济地位作为肾移植健康的社会决定因素的关键因素的作用的能力。本研究的目的是使用一种创新的社会经济状况指标,即基于住房的社会经济状况指标(HOUSES)指数,来检查健康的社会决定因素对肾移植的可及性和结果的影响。方法:我们的研究纳入了2010年至2020年间在单一中心接受肾移植的明尼苏达州居民(年龄大于18岁)。SES使用HOUSES指数确定,分为四分位数(Q1为较低,Q2-Q4为较高的SES)。我们使用混合效应多变量logistic和Cox模型来检验house对预先移植、移植前透析持续时间和死亡审查移植损失的影响,并对协变量进行调整。结果:在1975例符合条件的患者中,29.4%的患者接受了抢先移植,34.9%的患者接受了移植前透析,移植前透析时间为30年,15.1%的患者经历了死亡审查的移植物损失,中位随访时间为7.15年(四分位间距为4.25-11.38)年。较低的SES接受者(Q1)表明抢先移植的可能性降低(调整优势比[aOR]: 0.74;95%置信区间[CI], 0.57-0.97;P = 0.03),透析持续时间较长;优势:1.43;95% ci, 1.01-2.03;P = 0.046)和更高的死亡审查移植损失(调整风险比1.36;95% ci, 1.02-1.12;P = 0.036)与较高SES接受者相比(Q2-Q4)。结论:我们观察到肾移植可及性、透析持续时间和移植物存活方面存在显著的社会经济差异。HOUSES指数可能是基于个体的有针对性干预措施的一个很有前途的工具,因为它以个体而不是以地区为基础确定社会经济状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation Direct
Transplantation Direct TRANSPLANTATION-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
193
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Liver Transplant Provider Perspectives on Posttransplant Management of Alcohol Use Disorder. Comparison of Magnetic and Conventional Double-J Stent Following Kidney Transplantation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Thrombotic Microangiopathy: A Devastating Complication After Lung Transplantation. Transplantation of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Through Increased Utilization of Machine Perfusion Technology. Impact of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange and Rituximab for Prevention of Idiopathic Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis Recurrence Post-Kidney Transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1