Effect of comprehensive intervention model based on drug-psychology-society-skills on medication compliance and cognitive ability of chronic schizophrenia patients.

IF 3.9 4区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY World Journal of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.5498/wjp.v14.i12.1947
Hai-Jun Wang, Wei Chen, Xiao-Lin Yan, Qian-Ying Huang, Wei-Dong Xu
{"title":"Effect of comprehensive intervention model based on drug-psychology-society-skills on medication compliance and cognitive ability of chronic schizophrenia patients.","authors":"Hai-Jun Wang, Wei Chen, Xiao-Lin Yan, Qian-Ying Huang, Wei-Dong Xu","doi":"10.5498/wjp.v14.i12.1947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The intervention value of a drug-psycho-social-skill model on medication compliance and cognitive ability in patients with chronic schizophrenia was unknown.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the intervention value of a drug-psycho-social-skill model on medication compliance and cognitive ability in patients with chronic schizophrenia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Overall, 98 out-patients and in-patients with chronic schizophrenia treated in our hospital from February 2022 to January 2023 were included and randomly divided into the study (50 patients) and control groups (48 patients). For 3 months, the control group was treated with conventional drugs, and the research group with a comprehensive intervention model of drug-psychology-society-skills. Data were obtained for the mini mental assessment scale (MMSE), Montreal cognitive assessment scale (MoCA), positive and negative symptom scale, insight and treatment attitude scale, cognitive ability scale and social skills [personal and social function scale (PSP)]. The adverse reactions were observed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the intervention, the MMSE and MoCA scores improved in both groups. MoCA scores in the study group (26.58 ± 3.21) were significantly (<i>P</i> < 0.05) higher than those in the control group (24.68 ± 3.02), MMSE scores were not significantly higher. Post-intervention, positive and negative symptom scores improved in both groups, and the positive and negative symptom scores in the study group [(12.01 ± 2.58) and (32.51 ± 2.11)] were significantly (<i>P</i> < 0.05) different than those in the control group [(14.54 ± 2.33) and (33.74 ± 2.55)]. Post-intervention, insight and treatment attitudes questionnaire scores of both groups were improved and compared with the control group (7.97 ± 3.02), the study group (13.56 ± 6.35) had significantly (<i>P</i> < 0.05) higher scores. Post-intervention, the MATRICS consensus cognitive battery score of both groups was improved and compared with the control group (38.44 ± 6.23), the score of the study group was significantly (<i>P</i> < 0.05) increased (43.51 ± 6.01). Post-intervention, the PSP score of the study group (78.38 ± 6.63) was significantly (<i>P</i> < 0.05) higher than that of the control group (74.52 ± 7.01). During the intervention period, the incidence of adverse reactions in the study group was 6.25%, not significantly different from that in the control group (8.33%). During the intervention, both groups experienced adverse reactions, with no significant difference between groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The comprehensive intervention model based on drug-psychology-society-skills has obvious intervention effects on patients with chronic schizophrenia, which improves their cognitive ability and reduces their positive and negative symptoms. Simultaneously, it improves the self-knowledge of patients, improves their attitude toward treatment, effectively promotes the recovery of patients' social functions, and is safe. Therefore, it is worthy of being vigorously promoted and widely used in clinics.</p>","PeriodicalId":23896,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"14 12","pages":"1947-1955"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11622024/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v14.i12.1947","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The intervention value of a drug-psycho-social-skill model on medication compliance and cognitive ability in patients with chronic schizophrenia was unknown.

Aim: To explore the intervention value of a drug-psycho-social-skill model on medication compliance and cognitive ability in patients with chronic schizophrenia.

Methods: Overall, 98 out-patients and in-patients with chronic schizophrenia treated in our hospital from February 2022 to January 2023 were included and randomly divided into the study (50 patients) and control groups (48 patients). For 3 months, the control group was treated with conventional drugs, and the research group with a comprehensive intervention model of drug-psychology-society-skills. Data were obtained for the mini mental assessment scale (MMSE), Montreal cognitive assessment scale (MoCA), positive and negative symptom scale, insight and treatment attitude scale, cognitive ability scale and social skills [personal and social function scale (PSP)]. The adverse reactions were observed.

Results: After the intervention, the MMSE and MoCA scores improved in both groups. MoCA scores in the study group (26.58 ± 3.21) were significantly (P < 0.05) higher than those in the control group (24.68 ± 3.02), MMSE scores were not significantly higher. Post-intervention, positive and negative symptom scores improved in both groups, and the positive and negative symptom scores in the study group [(12.01 ± 2.58) and (32.51 ± 2.11)] were significantly (P < 0.05) different than those in the control group [(14.54 ± 2.33) and (33.74 ± 2.55)]. Post-intervention, insight and treatment attitudes questionnaire scores of both groups were improved and compared with the control group (7.97 ± 3.02), the study group (13.56 ± 6.35) had significantly (P < 0.05) higher scores. Post-intervention, the MATRICS consensus cognitive battery score of both groups was improved and compared with the control group (38.44 ± 6.23), the score of the study group was significantly (P < 0.05) increased (43.51 ± 6.01). Post-intervention, the PSP score of the study group (78.38 ± 6.63) was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than that of the control group (74.52 ± 7.01). During the intervention period, the incidence of adverse reactions in the study group was 6.25%, not significantly different from that in the control group (8.33%). During the intervention, both groups experienced adverse reactions, with no significant difference between groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: The comprehensive intervention model based on drug-psychology-society-skills has obvious intervention effects on patients with chronic schizophrenia, which improves their cognitive ability and reduces their positive and negative symptoms. Simultaneously, it improves the self-knowledge of patients, improves their attitude toward treatment, effectively promotes the recovery of patients' social functions, and is safe. Therefore, it is worthy of being vigorously promoted and widely used in clinics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于药物-心理-社会-技能的综合干预模式对慢性精神分裂症患者服药依从性和认知能力的影响
背景:药物-心理-社会技能模型对慢性精神分裂症患者服药依从性和认知能力的干预价值尚不清楚。目的:探讨药物-心理-社会技能模型对慢性精神分裂症患者服药依从性和认知能力的干预价值。方法:选取我院2022年2月至2023年1月收治的慢性精神分裂症门诊和住院患者98例,随机分为研究组(50例)和对照组(48例)。对照组给予常规药物治疗3个月,研究组给予药物-心理-社会-技能综合干预模式。获得迷你心理评估量表(MMSE)、蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)、阳性和阴性症状量表、洞察力和治疗态度量表、认知能力量表和社交技能量表(PSP)的数据。观察不良反应。结果:干预后两组患者MMSE和MoCA评分均有改善。研究组MoCA评分(26.58±3.21)显著高于对照组(24.68±3.02)(P < 0.05), MMSE评分无显著升高。干预后,两组患者阳性、阴性症状评分均有改善,研究组阳性、阴性症状评分[(12.01±2.58)、(32.51±2.11)]与对照组阳性、阴性症状评分[(14.54±2.33)、(33.74±2.55)]差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组患者干预后洞察力和治疗态度问卷得分均有改善,与对照组(7.97±3.02)分比较,研究组(13.56±6.35)分显著高于对照组(P < 0.05)。干预后,两组患者的matrix共识认知电池评分均有改善,与对照组(38.44±6.23)分比较,研究组评分(43.51±6.01)分显著升高(P < 0.05)。干预后,研究组PSP评分(78.38±6.63)明显高于对照组(74.52±7.01),差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。干预期间,研究组不良反应发生率为6.25%,与对照组(8.33%)差异无统计学意义。干预期间,两组患者均出现不良反应,两组间差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:基于药物-心理-社会-技能的综合干预模式对慢性精神分裂症患者具有明显的干预效果,提高了患者的认知能力,减轻了患者的阳性和阴性症状。同时,提高了患者的自我认识,改善了患者对治疗的态度,有效促进了患者社会功能的恢复,并且是安全的。因此,值得在临床中大力推广和广泛应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
6.50%
发文量
110
期刊介绍: The World Journal of Psychiatry (WJP) is a high-quality, peer reviewed, open-access journal. The primary task of WJP is to rapidly publish high-quality original articles, reviews, editorials, and case reports in the field of psychiatry. In order to promote productive academic communication, the peer review process for the WJP is transparent; to this end, all published manuscripts are accompanied by the anonymized reviewers’ comments as well as the authors’ responses. The primary aims of the WJP are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in psychiatry.
期刊最新文献
Challenges in the management of visual and tactile hallucinations in elderly people. Clinical value of combining epirubicin with mindfulness intervention in patients with urinary system tumors and depression. Association of stent thrombectomy and conventional treatment with neuroprotection, complications, anxiety, and depression in acute ischemic stroke patients. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor alterations and cognitive decline in schizophrenia: Implications for early intervention. Burden of mental disorders and risk factors in the Western Pacific region from 1990 to 2021.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1