Systematic literature review on the effects of blended learning in nursing education.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nurse Education in Practice Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104238
Ruowei Wang, Arumugam Raman
{"title":"Systematic literature review on the effects of blended learning in nursing education.","authors":"Ruowei Wang, Arumugam Raman","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study aimed to comprehensively analyze and evaluate the effects of blended learning in nursing education.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Blended learning addresses significant challenges in nursing education by offering flexible and adaptive learning environments that support the development of both theoretical knowledge and practical skills. Its importance grew post-COVID-19. Although some reviews have synthesized its effects in nursing education, they often focused on a limited scope and studies, leaving gaps in understanding its broader impact.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic literature review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to search for literature published in PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, EMBASE, ERIC, Scopus and Cochrane Library from 2000 to June 26, 2024. Two researchers independently screened each article for eligibility and extracted the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review included 54 studies and found that blended learning positively influenced nursing students in five key areas: academic performance and skill development, learning engagement and motivation, self-management in learning, psychological and emotional well-being, learning experience and satisfaction. These were captured in a visual model showing the comprehensive impact of blended learning. Critical research gaps were identified, including a lack of randomized controlled trials and limited studies on mental health and clinical thinking abilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of the study showed that the effects of blended learning in nursing education were positive and multi-dimensional. Despite some inconsistencies in findings, blended learning was shown to offer significant advantages over traditional learning, though further research is required to address areas of uncertainty.</p>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":"82 ","pages":"104238"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104238","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The study aimed to comprehensively analyze and evaluate the effects of blended learning in nursing education.

Background: Blended learning addresses significant challenges in nursing education by offering flexible and adaptive learning environments that support the development of both theoretical knowledge and practical skills. Its importance grew post-COVID-19. Although some reviews have synthesized its effects in nursing education, they often focused on a limited scope and studies, leaving gaps in understanding its broader impact.

Design: Systematic literature review.

Methods: We employed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to search for literature published in PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, EMBASE, ERIC, Scopus and Cochrane Library from 2000 to June 26, 2024. Two researchers independently screened each article for eligibility and extracted the data.

Results: This review included 54 studies and found that blended learning positively influenced nursing students in five key areas: academic performance and skill development, learning engagement and motivation, self-management in learning, psychological and emotional well-being, learning experience and satisfaction. These were captured in a visual model showing the comprehensive impact of blended learning. Critical research gaps were identified, including a lack of randomized controlled trials and limited studies on mental health and clinical thinking abilities.

Conclusions: The results of the study showed that the effects of blended learning in nursing education were positive and multi-dimensional. Despite some inconsistencies in findings, blended learning was shown to offer significant advantages over traditional learning, though further research is required to address areas of uncertainty.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
系统回顾了混合学习在护理教育中的效果。
目的:综合分析和评价混合学习在护理教育中的效果。背景:混合学习通过提供灵活和适应性的学习环境来支持理论知识和实践技能的发展,解决了护理教育中的重大挑战。新冠肺炎疫情后,其重要性与日俱增。虽然一些评论综合了其在护理教育中的作用,但它们往往集中在有限的范围和研究上,在理解其更广泛的影响方面留下了空白。设计:系统文献综述。方法:采用PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and meta - analysis)指南检索2000年至2024年6月26日在PubMed、CINAHL、Web of Science、EMBASE、ERIC、Scopus和Cochrane Library中发表的文献。两名研究人员独立筛选每篇文章的合格性并提取数据。结果:本综述包括54项研究,发现混合式学习对护生的学业成绩和技能发展、学习投入和动机、学习自我管理、心理和情感健康、学习体验和满意度五个关键领域有积极影响。这些被捕获在一个视觉模型中,显示了混合学习的全面影响。发现了关键的研究空白,包括缺乏随机对照试验和关于心理健康和临床思维能力的有限研究。结论:研究结果表明,混合学习在护理教育中的效果是积极的、多维的。尽管在研究结果中存在一些不一致之处,但混合学习被证明比传统学习具有显著的优势,尽管需要进一步的研究来解决不确定性领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.40%
发文量
180
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education in Practice enables lecturers and practitioners to both share and disseminate evidence that demonstrates the actual practice of education as it is experienced in the realities of their respective work environments. It is supportive of new authors and will be at the forefront in publishing individual and collaborative papers that demonstrate the link between education and practice.
期刊最新文献
The experience of transition from student nurse to registered nurse among newly graduated nurses in the paediatric setting: An integrative literature review. Sexual and reproductive health content in Australian pre-registration nursing and midwifery programs: A review of curricula. Effects of an ARCS-based interactive e-book featuring clinical scenarios on the learning motivation, self-efficacy and practical competence of nursing students in foetal heart rate interpretation. Corrigendum to "Unfinished nursing care occurrence, priority order and reasons as perceived by nursing students: An international study" [Nurse Educ. Pract. 79 (2024) 104100]. A cultural adaptation study of nursing informatics competency scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1