Post-hoc out-of-distribution detection for cardiac MRI segmentation

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2024.102476
Tewodros Weldebirhan Arega , Stéphanie Bricq , Fabrice Meriaudeau
{"title":"Post-hoc out-of-distribution detection for cardiac MRI segmentation","authors":"Tewodros Weldebirhan Arega ,&nbsp;Stéphanie Bricq ,&nbsp;Fabrice Meriaudeau","doi":"10.1016/j.compmedimag.2024.102476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In real-world scenarios, medical image segmentation models encounter input images that may deviate from the training images in various ways. These differences can arise from changes in image scanners and acquisition protocols, or even the images can come from a different modality or domain. When the model encounters these out-of-distribution (OOD) images, it can behave unpredictably. Therefore, it is important to develop a system that handles such out-of-distribution images to ensure the safe usage of the models in clinical practice. In this paper, we propose a post-hoc out-of-distribution (OOD) detection method that can be used with any pre-trained segmentation model. Our method utilizes multi-scale representations extracted from the encoder blocks of the segmentation model and employs Mahalanobis distance as a metric to measure the similarity between the input image and the in-distribution images. The segmentation model is pre-trained on a publicly available cardiac short-axis cine MRI dataset. The detection performance of the proposed method is evaluated on 13 different OOD datasets, which can be categorized as near, mild, and far OOD datasets based on their similarity to the in-distribution dataset. The results show that our method outperforms state-of-the-art feature space-based and uncertainty-based OOD detection methods across the various OOD datasets. Our method successfully detects near, mild, and far OOD images with high detection accuracy, showcasing the advantage of using the multi-scale and semantically rich representations of the encoder. In addition to the feature-based approach, we also propose a Dice coefficient-based OOD detection method, which demonstrates superior performance for adversarial OOD detection and shows a high correlation with segmentation quality. For the uncertainty-based method, despite having a strong correlation with the quality of the segmentation results in the near OOD datasets, they failed to detect mild and far OOD images, indicating the weakness of these methods when the images are more dissimilar. Future work will explore combining Mahalanobis distance and uncertainty scores for improved detection of challenging OOD images that are difficult to segment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50631,"journal":{"name":"Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 102476"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895611124001538","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In real-world scenarios, medical image segmentation models encounter input images that may deviate from the training images in various ways. These differences can arise from changes in image scanners and acquisition protocols, or even the images can come from a different modality or domain. When the model encounters these out-of-distribution (OOD) images, it can behave unpredictably. Therefore, it is important to develop a system that handles such out-of-distribution images to ensure the safe usage of the models in clinical practice. In this paper, we propose a post-hoc out-of-distribution (OOD) detection method that can be used with any pre-trained segmentation model. Our method utilizes multi-scale representations extracted from the encoder blocks of the segmentation model and employs Mahalanobis distance as a metric to measure the similarity between the input image and the in-distribution images. The segmentation model is pre-trained on a publicly available cardiac short-axis cine MRI dataset. The detection performance of the proposed method is evaluated on 13 different OOD datasets, which can be categorized as near, mild, and far OOD datasets based on their similarity to the in-distribution dataset. The results show that our method outperforms state-of-the-art feature space-based and uncertainty-based OOD detection methods across the various OOD datasets. Our method successfully detects near, mild, and far OOD images with high detection accuracy, showcasing the advantage of using the multi-scale and semantically rich representations of the encoder. In addition to the feature-based approach, we also propose a Dice coefficient-based OOD detection method, which demonstrates superior performance for adversarial OOD detection and shows a high correlation with segmentation quality. For the uncertainty-based method, despite having a strong correlation with the quality of the segmentation results in the near OOD datasets, they failed to detect mild and far OOD images, indicating the weakness of these methods when the images are more dissimilar. Future work will explore combining Mahalanobis distance and uncertainty scores for improved detection of challenging OOD images that are difficult to segment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心脏MRI分割的事后非分布检测。
在现实场景中,医学图像分割模型会遇到输入图像可能以各种方式偏离训练图像的情况。这些差异可能来自图像扫描仪和采集协议的变化,甚至图像可能来自不同的模态或域。当模型遇到这些分布外(OOD)图像时,它的行为可能不可预测。因此,开发一种系统来处理这种分布外的图像,以确保模型在临床实践中的安全使用是很重要的。在本文中,我们提出了一种可用于任何预训练分割模型的post-hoc out- distribution (OOD)检测方法。我们的方法利用从分割模型的编码器块中提取的多尺度表示,并使用马氏距离作为度量输入图像与分布中图像之间的相似性的度量。分割模型在公开可用的心脏短轴电影MRI数据集上进行预训练。在13个不同的OOD数据集上评估了该方法的检测性能,这些数据集可以根据其与分布内数据集的相似性分为近、轻度和远OOD数据集。结果表明,我们的方法在各种OOD数据集上优于最先进的基于特征空间和基于不确定性的OOD检测方法。我们的方法以较高的检测精度成功地检测了近、轻度和远OOD图像,展示了使用编码器的多尺度和语义丰富表示的优势。除了基于特征的方法外,我们还提出了一种基于Dice系数的OOD检测方法,该方法在对抗性OOD检测中表现出优越的性能,并且与分割质量具有很高的相关性。对于基于不确定性的方法,尽管与近OOD数据集的分割结果质量有很强的相关性,但它们无法检测到轻度和远OOD图像,这表明这些方法在图像差异较大时的弱点。未来的工作将探索结合马氏距离和不确定性评分,以改进难以分割的具有挑战性的OOD图像的检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
3.50%
发文量
71
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics is to act as a source for the exchange of research results concerning algorithmic advances, development, and application of digital imaging in disease detection, diagnosis, intervention, prevention, precision medicine, and population health. Included in the journal will be articles on novel computerized imaging or visualization techniques, including artificial intelligence and machine learning, augmented reality for surgical planning and guidance, big biomedical data visualization, computer-aided diagnosis, computerized-robotic surgery, image-guided therapy, imaging scanning and reconstruction, mobile and tele-imaging, radiomics, and imaging integration and modeling with other information relevant to digital health. The types of biomedical imaging include: magnetic resonance, computed tomography, ultrasound, nuclear medicine, X-ray, microwave, optical and multi-photon microscopy, video and sensory imaging, and the convergence of biomedical images with other non-imaging datasets.
期刊最新文献
Prior knowledge-based multi-task learning network for pulmonary nodule classification Automatic Joint Lesion Detection by enhancing local feature interaction TQGDNet: Coronary artery calcium deposit detection on computed tomography CGNet: Few-shot learning for Intracranial Hemorrhage Segmentation Weakly supervised multi-modal contrastive learning framework for predicting the HER2 scores in breast cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1