High-Risk Opioid Prescribing and Nurse Practitioner Independence.

IF 9.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JAMA Health Forum Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.4544
Lucas D Cusimano, Nicole Maestas
{"title":"High-Risk Opioid Prescribing and Nurse Practitioner Independence.","authors":"Lucas D Cusimano, Nicole Maestas","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.4544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Concerns around excessive opioid prescribing have been used to argue against the expansion of the scope of practice of nurse practitioners (NPs), but the association of NP practice independence with high-risk opioid prescribing is not well understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether the rates of high-risk opioid prescribing changed in association with NP independence legislation.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This difference-in-differences analysis compared rates of high-risk opioid prescribing in 6 states over 2 years following the adoption of NP independence compared with 10 neighboring nonadopting states from January 2012 to December 2021. Prescription insurance claims for 2 874 213 continuously enrolled individuals (members) aged 18 to 64 years from Blue Cross Blue Shield Axis were analyzed. Data analysis was carried out from 2021 to 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Timing of the legislative effective date of NP independence in a state.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the rate of opioid prescriptions that overlapped with a prescription for a central nervous system (CNS) depressant. Secondary outcomes included the number of days of opioid-CNS depressant overlap, as well as the dosage and days supplied of opioids among all members and among opioid-naive members.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six states that adopted NP independence legislation and 10 nonadopting neighboring states were similar in terms of demographic characteristics and had comparable pretrends in prescribing. The estimated change in the rate of opioid prescriptions that overlapped with a CNS depressant was -0.03 per 100 members per month (95% CI, -0.11 to 0.05). Changes in the number of days of opioid-CNS depressant overlap and in the dosage and days supplied of opioids among all members and among opioid-naive members were also small and statistically insignificant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The results of this difference-in-differences analysis suggest that there was no relative increase in rates of high-risk opioid prescribing during the 2 years following the adoption of independence for NPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"5 12","pages":"e244544"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11662257/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.4544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Concerns around excessive opioid prescribing have been used to argue against the expansion of the scope of practice of nurse practitioners (NPs), but the association of NP practice independence with high-risk opioid prescribing is not well understood.

Objective: To assess whether the rates of high-risk opioid prescribing changed in association with NP independence legislation.

Design, setting, and participants: This difference-in-differences analysis compared rates of high-risk opioid prescribing in 6 states over 2 years following the adoption of NP independence compared with 10 neighboring nonadopting states from January 2012 to December 2021. Prescription insurance claims for 2 874 213 continuously enrolled individuals (members) aged 18 to 64 years from Blue Cross Blue Shield Axis were analyzed. Data analysis was carried out from 2021 to 2024.

Exposure: Timing of the legislative effective date of NP independence in a state.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was the rate of opioid prescriptions that overlapped with a prescription for a central nervous system (CNS) depressant. Secondary outcomes included the number of days of opioid-CNS depressant overlap, as well as the dosage and days supplied of opioids among all members and among opioid-naive members.

Results: Six states that adopted NP independence legislation and 10 nonadopting neighboring states were similar in terms of demographic characteristics and had comparable pretrends in prescribing. The estimated change in the rate of opioid prescriptions that overlapped with a CNS depressant was -0.03 per 100 members per month (95% CI, -0.11 to 0.05). Changes in the number of days of opioid-CNS depressant overlap and in the dosage and days supplied of opioids among all members and among opioid-naive members were also small and statistically insignificant.

Conclusions and relevance: The results of this difference-in-differences analysis suggest that there was no relative increase in rates of high-risk opioid prescribing during the 2 years following the adoption of independence for NPs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高危阿片类药物处方和执业护士独立性。
重要性:对过量阿片类药物处方的担忧被用来反对护士执业者(NPs)执业范围的扩大,但NP执业独立性与高风险阿片类药物处方的关系尚不清楚。目的:评估高危阿片类药物处方率是否与NP独立立法相关。设计、环境和参与者:本差异中差异分析比较了2012年1月至2021年12月6个州采用NP独立后2年内与10个邻近未采用NP独立的州相比的高风险阿片类药物处方率。对2 874 213名年龄在18 - 64岁的蓝十字蓝盾连续登记个人(会员)的处方保险索赔进行了分析。数据分析时间为2021 - 2024年。曝光:国家党独立立法生效日期的时间。主要结局和措施:主要结局是阿片类药物处方与中枢神经系统(CNS)抑制剂处方重叠的比率。次要结局包括阿片类药物与中枢神经系统抑制剂重叠的天数,以及所有成员和未使用阿片类药物的成员中阿片类药物的剂量和供应天数。结果:采用NP独立立法的6个州和未采用NP独立立法的10个邻近州在人口统计学特征和处方前趋势方面相似。阿片类药物处方与中枢神经系统抑制剂重叠的估计变化率为每月每100名成员-0.03 (95% CI, -0.11至0.05)。阿片类药物-中枢神经系统抑制剂重叠的天数以及阿片类药物的剂量和供应天数的变化在所有成员和阿片类药物初始成员中也很小,统计学上不显著。结论和相关性:这种差异中差异分析的结果表明,在NPs采用独立治疗后的2年内,高危阿片类药物处方率没有相对增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Screening of hypercortisolism among patients with hypertension: an Italian nationwide survey.
IF 5.4 2区 医学Journal of Endocrinological InvestigationPub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1007/s40618-024-02387-2
G Di Dalmazi, J Goi, J Burrello, L Tucci, A F G Cicero, C Mancusi, E Coletti Moia, G Iaccarino, C Borghi, M L Muiesan, C Ferri, P Mulatero
Management of Renovascular Hypertension and Renal Denervation in Patients with Hypertension: An Italian Nationwide Survey.
IF 3.1 High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular PreventionPub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1007/s40292-024-00668-8
Marco Pappaccogli, Lara Ponsa, Jessica Goi, Jacopo Burrello, Guido Di Dalmazi, Arrigo Francesco Giuseppe Cicero, Costantino Mancusi, Elena Coletti Moia, Guido Iaccarino, Claudio Borghi, Maria Lorenza Muiesan, Claudio Ferri, Franco Rabbia, Paolo Mulatero
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
期刊最新文献
The Hard Road Ahead for State Public Health Departments. Enhanced COVID-19 Provider Relief, Hospital Finances, and Care for Medicare Inpatients. JAMA Health Forum. Newborn Screening for Sickle Cell Disease and Thalassemia. Population-Based Payments to Deliver Health Care to Unhoused Individuals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1