US Tobacco 21 Policies and Potential Mortality Reductions by State.

IF 9.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JAMA Health Forum Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.4445
Jamie Tam, Alyssa Crippen, Abigail Friedman, Jihyoun Jeon, David C Colston, Nancy L Fleischer, Catherine A Vander Woude, Megan A Boelter, Theodore R Holford, David T Levy, Rafael Meza
{"title":"US Tobacco 21 Policies and Potential Mortality Reductions by State.","authors":"Jamie Tam, Alyssa Crippen, Abigail Friedman, Jihyoun Jeon, David C Colston, Nancy L Fleischer, Catherine A Vander Woude, Megan A Boelter, Theodore R Holford, David T Levy, Rafael Meza","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.4445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Research shows that Tobacco 21 (T21) policies with a minimum legal access age for tobacco products of 21 years reduce smoking, yet their impact varies across US states due to differences in smoking behaviors, mortality rates, and policy coverage.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To quantify potential reductions in smoking-attributable mortality associated with Tobacco 21 policies for each of the 50 states and Washington, DC.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>The Cancer Intervention Surveillance and Modeling Network (CISNET) Tobacco Control Policy Model of smoking was used with detailed state-specific data on smoking initiation, smoking cessation and mortality rates as they vary by age, gender, and birth cohort for 50 US states and the District of Columbia. This was integrated with comprehensive data on T21 policy coverage at the local and state levels from 2005 to 2024, and then T21 policy effects from quasi-experimental studies were applied to simulate each state's experience of T21 policies, quantifying potential mortality reductions from 2005 to 2100.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Cigarette smoking.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Estimated smoking-attributable deaths averted and life-years gained compared with a baseline scenario.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Early statewide T21 adoption in California, combined with its large population, was associated with more than 27 000 premature deaths averted through 2100, whereas statewide implementation in Kentucky was associated with 15 000 averted premature deaths. In Massachusetts, T21 policies were associated with 8000 averted premature deaths, largely attributed to municipal T21 policies covering most residents. Wisconsin-lacking state or local policies-requires enforcement of federal T21 to prevent up to 10 000 premature deaths. Across the country, comprehensive enforcement of federal, state, and local T21 laws were associated with up to 526 000 premature deaths averted and 13.3 million life-years gained by 2100. Enforcement of only state and local policies was associated with 442 000 premature deaths averted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This study found that early adoption and implementation of T21 policies maximizes potential premature mortality reductions. However, the strength of T21 policies and enforcement varies widely across states. Enforcement of the federal T21 law is critical in the 8 states without state-level T21 cigarette policies of their own.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"5 12","pages":"e244445"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11662258/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.4445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Research shows that Tobacco 21 (T21) policies with a minimum legal access age for tobacco products of 21 years reduce smoking, yet their impact varies across US states due to differences in smoking behaviors, mortality rates, and policy coverage.

Objective: To quantify potential reductions in smoking-attributable mortality associated with Tobacco 21 policies for each of the 50 states and Washington, DC.

Design, setting, and participants: The Cancer Intervention Surveillance and Modeling Network (CISNET) Tobacco Control Policy Model of smoking was used with detailed state-specific data on smoking initiation, smoking cessation and mortality rates as they vary by age, gender, and birth cohort for 50 US states and the District of Columbia. This was integrated with comprehensive data on T21 policy coverage at the local and state levels from 2005 to 2024, and then T21 policy effects from quasi-experimental studies were applied to simulate each state's experience of T21 policies, quantifying potential mortality reductions from 2005 to 2100.

Exposures: Cigarette smoking.

Main outcomes and measures: Estimated smoking-attributable deaths averted and life-years gained compared with a baseline scenario.

Results: Early statewide T21 adoption in California, combined with its large population, was associated with more than 27 000 premature deaths averted through 2100, whereas statewide implementation in Kentucky was associated with 15 000 averted premature deaths. In Massachusetts, T21 policies were associated with 8000 averted premature deaths, largely attributed to municipal T21 policies covering most residents. Wisconsin-lacking state or local policies-requires enforcement of federal T21 to prevent up to 10 000 premature deaths. Across the country, comprehensive enforcement of federal, state, and local T21 laws were associated with up to 526 000 premature deaths averted and 13.3 million life-years gained by 2100. Enforcement of only state and local policies was associated with 442 000 premature deaths averted.

Conclusions and relevance: This study found that early adoption and implementation of T21 policies maximizes potential premature mortality reductions. However, the strength of T21 policies and enforcement varies widely across states. Enforcement of the federal T21 law is critical in the 8 states without state-level T21 cigarette policies of their own.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国烟草政策和各州潜在的死亡率降低。
重要性:研究表明,21岁烟草(T21)政策将烟草制品的最低合法获取年龄定为21岁,减少了吸烟,但由于吸烟行为、死亡率和政策覆盖范围的差异,其影响在美国各州有所不同。目的:量化与50个州和华盛顿特区的烟草21政策相关的吸烟导致死亡率的潜在降低。设计、环境和参与者:使用癌症干预监测和建模网络(CISNET)烟草控制政策吸烟模型,并结合美国50个州和哥伦比亚特区的年龄、性别和出生队列不同的吸烟开始、戒烟和死亡率的详细州特定数据。结合2005年至2024年地方和州一级T21政策覆盖范围的综合数据,然后应用准实验研究的T21政策效应来模拟各州的T21政策经验,量化2005年至2100年期间潜在的死亡率降低。暴露:吸烟。主要结果和措施:与基线情景相比,估计可避免吸烟导致的死亡和增加的生命年。结果:加州早期在全州范围内采用T21,结合其庞大的人口,到2100年避免了超过27 000例过早死亡,而肯塔基州在全州范围内实施T21,避免了15 000例过早死亡。在马萨诸塞州,T21政策与8000例避免过早死亡有关,这在很大程度上归功于覆盖大多数居民的市政T21政策。威斯康星州缺乏州或地方政策,要求执行联邦T21,以防止多达10,000 000人过早死亡。在全国范围内,联邦、州和地方T21法律的全面执行与到2100年避免多达526 000例过早死亡和增加1330万生命年有关。仅执行州和地方政策可避免44.2 000例过早死亡。结论和相关性:本研究发现,早期采用和实施T21政策可最大限度地降低过早死亡率。然而,各州的T21政策和执行力度差别很大。在没有自己的州一级T21香烟政策的8个州,联邦T21法律的执行至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
期刊最新文献
New FDA Policies Could Limit the Full Value of AI in Medicine. Changes in US Primary Care Access and Capabilities During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Errors in Figure. JAMA Health Forum. Recognizing and Strengthening the 4 Pillars of US Childhood Vaccine Policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1