Abdominal wall closure: How do we do it in Spain? Survey of specialist general surgeons members of the AEC (Spanish Society of Surgeons)

Montserrat Juvany , Alejandro Bravo-Salva , Jose Antonio Pereira-Rodríguez, Members of the Board of the AEC Abdominal Wall Section
{"title":"Abdominal wall closure: How do we do it in Spain? Survey of specialist general surgeons members of the AEC (Spanish Society of Surgeons)","authors":"Montserrat Juvany ,&nbsp;Alejandro Bravo-Salva ,&nbsp;Jose Antonio Pereira-Rodríguez,&nbsp;Members of the Board of the AEC Abdominal Wall Section","doi":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.12.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the knowledge of abdominal wall closure in a cohort of specialist general surgeons who are members of the AEC and to see its adequacy with current recommendations. Sub-analysis in terms of years of specialization.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>Individual questionnaire of 21 questions on abdominal wall closure in elective and urgent context.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 371 responses were received from specialist surgeons who are members of the AEC. Closure of the median laparotomy is performed with continuous suture in 99.7% and with slowly absorbable materials in 95.4%. 88.4% of surgeons report using the ratio equal to or greater than 4:1 between suture length and incision length (SL:IL) and short stitches. These results are equivalent in transverse and urgent elective laparotomy. 85.2% of the respondents systematically close trocars of 10 mm or more and 30.7% use prophylactic mesh in high-risk patients. Surgeons with less than 10 years of experience use the ratio ≥ 4:1 SL:SI and short stitches more than surgeons with more experience (93.4% vs 84.9%; <em>P</em> = .013).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Abdominal wall closure among general surgeons who are members of the ACS is adequate and adjusted to the recommendations with a tendency to improve among surgeons with less experience. There is an opportunity for improvement in the use of prophylactic mesh in high-risk patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93935,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia espanola","volume":"103 2","pages":"Pages 84-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia espanola","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173507724002813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the knowledge of abdominal wall closure in a cohort of specialist general surgeons who are members of the AEC and to see its adequacy with current recommendations. Sub-analysis in terms of years of specialization.

Material and methods

Individual questionnaire of 21 questions on abdominal wall closure in elective and urgent context.

Results

A total of 371 responses were received from specialist surgeons who are members of the AEC. Closure of the median laparotomy is performed with continuous suture in 99.7% and with slowly absorbable materials in 95.4%. 88.4% of surgeons report using the ratio equal to or greater than 4:1 between suture length and incision length (SL:IL) and short stitches. These results are equivalent in transverse and urgent elective laparotomy. 85.2% of the respondents systematically close trocars of 10 mm or more and 30.7% use prophylactic mesh in high-risk patients. Surgeons with less than 10 years of experience use the ratio ≥ 4:1 SL:SI and short stitches more than surgeons with more experience (93.4% vs 84.9%; P = .013).

Conclusions

Abdominal wall closure among general surgeons who are members of the ACS is adequate and adjusted to the recommendations with a tendency to improve among surgeons with less experience. There is an opportunity for improvement in the use of prophylactic mesh in high-risk patients.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹壁闭合术:西班牙是怎么做的?对 AEC(西班牙外科医生协会)成员中的专科普外科医生进行的调查。
目的:评估作为AEC成员的一组专科普通外科医生对腹壁闭合的认识,并观察其是否符合目前的建议。按专业年限进行子分析。材料与方法:对选择性和紧急情况下腹壁闭合的21个问题进行问卷调查。结果:共收到371份来自AEC成员的专科外科医生的回复。连续缝线缝合腹正中切口占99.7%,缓慢可吸收材料缝合占95.4%。88.4%的外科医生报告使用缝合长度与切口长度(SL:IL)之比等于或大于4:1和短针。这些结果在横向和紧急择期剖腹手术中是相同的。85.2%的应答者系统闭合套管针大于10毫米,30.7%的高危患者使用预防性补片。经验不足10年的外科医生使用SL:IL和短针的比例≥4:1 (93.4% vs 84.9%;p = 0.013)。结论:作为ACS成员的普通外科医生的腹壁闭合术是足够的,并根据建议进行调整,经验较少的外科医生有改善的趋势。高危患者预防性补片的使用仍有改进的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Consensus-based validation of key quality indicators in pancreatic cancer surgery in Catalonia: A modified Delphi study. Omic analysis of the protein profile in digestive tumours, from proteomics to clinical practice. Dexketoprofen-mediated attenuation of ischemia-reperfusion injury in a rat model of lower limb ischemia. Preperitoneal endoscopic Intracorporeal Rectus Aponeuroplasty (PeIRA) technique for midline ventral hernia repair. New technique based on LIRA concepts. Coloproctology practice during General and Digestive Surgery training. Survey of the Galician Coloproctology Group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1