Expectations and opinions regarding the implementation of a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system - a before-and-after survey.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Informatics Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1177/14604582241304717
Viktoria Jungreithmayr, Walter E Haefeli, Hanna M Seidling
{"title":"Expectations and opinions regarding the implementation of a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system - a before-and-after survey.","authors":"Viktoria Jungreithmayr, Walter E Haefeli, Hanna M Seidling","doi":"10.1177/14604582241304717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Despite the documented beneficial effects of computerized physician order entry (CPOE) systems and despite numerous incentives for their adoption in various countries around the globe implementation teams encounter unexpected difficulties when launching CPOE systems. This survey aimed at gathering users' opinions on CPOE implementation. Additional factors that can be influenced by CPOE implementation were equally considered, namely workplace satisfaction, interprofessional collaboration, patient safety climate, system usability, and organisational readiness to implement change. <b>Methods:</b> We performed a mixed-mode survey at a tertiary care university hospital that introduced a commercial CPOE system. The survey consisted of validated questionnaires, self-developed, and socio-demographic questions. It was distributed both before and after CPOE implementation. Answers were descriptively analysed, compared between time-points, and assessed in relation to socio-demographic characteristics. <b>Results:</b> Users showed very diverse and only cautiously optimistic opinions towards CPOE implementation, which remained mainly unchanged during the post-survey. Respondents rated the system usability, organisational readiness for implementing change, and patient safety climate rather poorly, while workplace satisfaction and interprofessional collaboration were rated positively. <b>Conclusion:</b> This survey contributes to understanding user perspectives by providing valuable insights into user opinions before and after CPOE implementation, taking into account a range of associated factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":55069,"journal":{"name":"Health Informatics Journal","volume":"30 4","pages":"14604582241304717"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Informatics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582241304717","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Despite the documented beneficial effects of computerized physician order entry (CPOE) systems and despite numerous incentives for their adoption in various countries around the globe implementation teams encounter unexpected difficulties when launching CPOE systems. This survey aimed at gathering users' opinions on CPOE implementation. Additional factors that can be influenced by CPOE implementation were equally considered, namely workplace satisfaction, interprofessional collaboration, patient safety climate, system usability, and organisational readiness to implement change. Methods: We performed a mixed-mode survey at a tertiary care university hospital that introduced a commercial CPOE system. The survey consisted of validated questionnaires, self-developed, and socio-demographic questions. It was distributed both before and after CPOE implementation. Answers were descriptively analysed, compared between time-points, and assessed in relation to socio-demographic characteristics. Results: Users showed very diverse and only cautiously optimistic opinions towards CPOE implementation, which remained mainly unchanged during the post-survey. Respondents rated the system usability, organisational readiness for implementing change, and patient safety climate rather poorly, while workplace satisfaction and interprofessional collaboration were rated positively. Conclusion: This survey contributes to understanding user perspectives by providing valuable insights into user opinions before and after CPOE implementation, taking into account a range of associated factors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于计算机化医嘱输入(CPOE)系统实施的期望和意见-前后调查。
目的:尽管计算机化医嘱输入(CPOE)系统的有益效果有文献记载,尽管在全球各国采用CPOE系统有许多激励措施,但实施团队在启动CPOE系统时遇到了意想不到的困难。本次调查旨在收集用户对CPOE实施的意见。CPOE实施可能影响的其他因素也被同等考虑,即工作场所满意度、跨专业协作、患者安全氛围、系统可用性和组织实施变更的准备程度。方法:我们在一家引进商业化CPOE系统的三级保健大学医院进行了混合模式调查。该调查包括有效的问卷、自行开发的问题和社会人口问题。它是在CPOE实施前后分发的。对答案进行描述性分析,在时间点之间进行比较,并评估与社会人口特征的关系。结果:用户对CPOE实施的看法非常多样化,仅持谨慎乐观态度,在调查后基本保持不变。受访者对系统可用性、实施变革的组织准备程度和患者安全气候的评价相当差,而对工作场所满意度和跨专业协作的评价则是积极的。结论:考虑到一系列相关因素,本调查提供了CPOE实施前后用户意见的宝贵见解,有助于了解用户观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Informatics Journal
Health Informatics Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICAL INFORMATICS
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Informatics Journal is an international peer-reviewed journal. All papers submitted to Health Informatics Journal are subject to peer review by members of a carefully appointed editorial board. The journal operates a conventional single-blind reviewing policy in which the reviewer’s name is always concealed from the submitting author.
期刊最新文献
Researching public health datasets in the era of deep learning: a systematic literature review. A blueprint for large language model-augmented telehealth for HIV mitigation in Indonesia: A scoping review of a novel therapeutic modality. Advancing African American and hispanic health literacy with a bilingual, personalized, prevention smartphone application. Evaluating the quality of Spanish-language information for patients with type 2 diabetes on YouTube and Facebook. Pathways to usage intention of mobile health apps among hypertensive patients: A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1