Availability and quality assessment of Clinical Practice Guidelines on orthoplastic surgery treatment of open fractures of the lower limb using AGREE II tool: A systematic review.

Martin Iurilli, Sara Dentice, Marco Di Nitto, Daniela Coclite, Antonello Napoletano, Velia Bruno, Gianluca Canton, Vittorio Ramella, Luigi Murena, Giovanni Papa
{"title":"Availability and quality assessment of Clinical Practice Guidelines on orthoplastic surgery treatment of open fractures of the lower limb using AGREE II tool: A systematic review.","authors":"Martin Iurilli, Sara Dentice, Marco Di Nitto, Daniela Coclite, Antonello Napoletano, Velia Bruno, Gianluca Canton, Vittorio Ramella, Luigi Murena, Giovanni Papa","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Orthoplastic surgery, which combines orthopedic and plastic surgery principles, plays a crucial role in the treatment of open fractures of the lower limb. Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) are valuable tools for standardizing and improving patient care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the availability and quality of international CPGs for orthoplastic treatment of open fractures of the lower limb. A secondary objective was to provide a detailed analysis of the specific recommendations by comparing them among different CPGs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted in 2023 according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines across major medical databases and gray literature. Inclusion criteria focused on guidelines specific to orthoplastic surgery for lower limb open fractures. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool, a widely accepted instrument for guideline assessment, was utilized to evaluate the methodological rigor and transparency of the selected guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three orthoplasty CPGs have been identified, 2 of which were judged reliable according to the AGREE II methodology. Orthoplastic recommendations are no more than 7 per CPG. Consistent agreement was observed on the timing of debridement, the importance of early fixation, and definitive coverage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CPGs are critical to set up clinical pathways that are safe and evidence-based. Only 3 international CPGs address orthoplastic treatment of open lower limb fractures, 2 of which are judged reliable according to methodology. Therefore, it becomes essential to develop and disseminate high-quality, evidence-based guidelines, which are critical to improving patient outcomes and standardizing clinical practice worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":94104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","volume":"100 ","pages":"341-361"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Orthoplastic surgery, which combines orthopedic and plastic surgery principles, plays a crucial role in the treatment of open fractures of the lower limb. Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) are valuable tools for standardizing and improving patient care.

Objective: To assess the availability and quality of international CPGs for orthoplastic treatment of open fractures of the lower limb. A secondary objective was to provide a detailed analysis of the specific recommendations by comparing them among different CPGs.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted in 2023 according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines across major medical databases and gray literature. Inclusion criteria focused on guidelines specific to orthoplastic surgery for lower limb open fractures. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool, a widely accepted instrument for guideline assessment, was utilized to evaluate the methodological rigor and transparency of the selected guidelines.

Results: Three orthoplasty CPGs have been identified, 2 of which were judged reliable according to the AGREE II methodology. Orthoplastic recommendations are no more than 7 per CPG. Consistent agreement was observed on the timing of debridement, the importance of early fixation, and definitive coverage.

Conclusion: CPGs are critical to set up clinical pathways that are safe and evidence-based. Only 3 international CPGs address orthoplastic treatment of open lower limb fractures, 2 of which are judged reliable according to methodology. Therefore, it becomes essential to develop and disseminate high-quality, evidence-based guidelines, which are critical to improving patient outcomes and standardizing clinical practice worldwide.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用 AGREE II 工具评估下肢开放性骨折整形外科治疗临床实践指南的可用性和质量:系统回顾。
导读:骨科手术结合了骨科和整形外科的原理,在治疗下肢开放性骨折中起着至关重要的作用。临床实践指南(CPGs)是标准化和改善患者护理的宝贵工具。目的:评价国际通用的CPGs在开放性下肢骨折矫形治疗中的可用性和质量。第二个目标是通过比较不同CPGs的具体建议,对其进行详细分析。方法:根据主要医学数据库和灰色文献的系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目,于2023年进行了系统评价。纳入标准侧重于下肢开放性骨折矫形手术的具体指南。研究和评估指南评估II (AGREE II)工具是一种广泛接受的指南评估工具,用于评估所选指南的方法严谨性和透明度。结果:确定了3个矫形术cpg,其中2个根据AGREE II方法被认为是可靠的。整形建议不超过7 / CPG。在清创时机、早期固定的重要性和最终覆盖范围方面,观察到一致的意见。结论:CPGs对建立安全、循证的临床路径至关重要。仅有3篇国际CPGs涉及开放性下肢骨折的矫形治疗,其中2篇根据方法学被认为是可靠的。因此,制定和传播高质量的循证指南变得至关重要,这对于改善患者预后和规范全球临床实践至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The effect of massive liposuction surgery of the abdomen and flanks on insulin and some adipokines. Letter comments on: 'Current trends in retraction of plastic surgery and reconstruction research'. The rising NHS burden from cosmetic surgery procedures performed abroad and non-surgical procedures performed in the United Kingdom. Response to José Antonio Arellano et al. to their comments on our article "A single-center retrospective comparison of muscle versus cutaneous free flaps for posterior elbow defect reconstruction". In Reply to Comment on "Timing of sentinel lymph node biopsy and lymphoscintigraphy before surgery for melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1