Soil Quality Index According to Diverse Land Use Systems Across the Europe

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Land Degradation & Development Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1002/ldr.5438
Baig Abdullah Al Shoumik, Ewa Błońska, Jarosław Lasota
{"title":"Soil Quality Index According to Diverse Land Use Systems Across the Europe","authors":"Baig Abdullah Al Shoumik,&nbsp;Ewa Błońska,&nbsp;Jarosław Lasota","doi":"10.1002/ldr.5438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Soil quality index (SQI) can be an effective parameter to evaluate soil quality based on plant growth and ecosystem services at a large scale. According to the European Commission, around 60%–70% of the European soil is not healthy due to degradation and rapid conversion of land uses; however, detailed studies on soil quality according to different land uses in the entire Europe are very limited. We aimed to develop an SQI using the Land Use and Coverage Area Frame Survey (LUCAS) database for the existing croplands (230 samples), grasslands (53 samples), and woodlands (36 samples) to evaluate the overall soil quality across the continent. A total of five soil variables (sand, organic carbon, electrical conductivity, bacteria, and fungi) were selected for the minimum dataset based on principal component analysis from all 13 variables to avoid redundancy. The relationship between the developed SQI and climatic variables (precipitation and temperature) was also analyzed. We found that croplands had higher SQI (0.45 ± 0.09) than grasslands (0.44 ± 0.09) and woodlands (0.43 ± 0.1), with no significant differences among the land uses (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). The spatial analysis revealed higher SQI (&gt; 0.46) in the central part of the EU and lower (&lt; 0.46) in the northern and southwestern EU. The sub-categorical assessment of land uses showed that broadleaved and mixed woodland had better soil quality than the coniferous counterparts. The SQI showed a weak relationship with precipitation and temperature in all land uses, and it differs depending on climatic zones. Our findings also suggested that the agricultural management practices in cropland and better soil quality in grassland might buffer the influences of short-term variations in temperature and precipitation. We conclude that this EU-scale study of SQI provides a clear view of the soil quality status, which can also be effective for the policymakers to adopt sustainable management practices for improving soil quality.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":203,"journal":{"name":"Land Degradation & Development","volume":"36 5","pages":"1467-1482"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Degradation & Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ldr.5438","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil quality index (SQI) can be an effective parameter to evaluate soil quality based on plant growth and ecosystem services at a large scale. According to the European Commission, around 60%–70% of the European soil is not healthy due to degradation and rapid conversion of land uses; however, detailed studies on soil quality according to different land uses in the entire Europe are very limited. We aimed to develop an SQI using the Land Use and Coverage Area Frame Survey (LUCAS) database for the existing croplands (230 samples), grasslands (53 samples), and woodlands (36 samples) to evaluate the overall soil quality across the continent. A total of five soil variables (sand, organic carbon, electrical conductivity, bacteria, and fungi) were selected for the minimum dataset based on principal component analysis from all 13 variables to avoid redundancy. The relationship between the developed SQI and climatic variables (precipitation and temperature) was also analyzed. We found that croplands had higher SQI (0.45 ± 0.09) than grasslands (0.44 ± 0.09) and woodlands (0.43 ± 0.1), with no significant differences among the land uses (p > 0.05). The spatial analysis revealed higher SQI (> 0.46) in the central part of the EU and lower (< 0.46) in the northern and southwestern EU. The sub-categorical assessment of land uses showed that broadleaved and mixed woodland had better soil quality than the coniferous counterparts. The SQI showed a weak relationship with precipitation and temperature in all land uses, and it differs depending on climatic zones. Our findings also suggested that the agricultural management practices in cropland and better soil quality in grassland might buffer the influences of short-term variations in temperature and precipitation. We conclude that this EU-scale study of SQI provides a clear view of the soil quality status, which can also be effective for the policymakers to adopt sustainable management practices for improving soil quality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲不同土地利用系统的土壤质量指数
土壤质量指数(SQI)是在大尺度上基于植物生长和生态系统服务评价土壤质量的有效参数。据欧盟委员会称,由于退化和土地用途的快速转换,欧洲约有60%-70%的土壤不健康;然而,在整个欧洲,根据不同的土地利用方式对土壤质量进行详细的研究非常有限。我们的目标是利用土地利用和覆盖面积框架调查(LUCAS)数据库,对现有的农田(230个样本)、草地(53个样本)和林地(36个样本)开发一个SQI,以评估整个大陆的整体土壤质量。为了避免冗余,我们从所有13个变量中选择了5个土壤变量(沙子、有机碳、电导率、细菌和真菌)作为最小数据集。分析了SQI的发展与气候变量(降水和温度)的关系。结果表明,耕地的SQI(0.45±0.09)高于草地(0.44±0.09)和林地(0.43±0.1),不同土地利用类型间SQI差异不显著(p >;0.05)。空间分析显示SQI较高(>;0.46),在欧盟中部和更低(<;0.46)在欧盟北部和西南部。土地利用亚分类评价表明,阔叶林和混交林土壤质量优于针叶林。在所有土地利用类型中,SQI与降水和温度的关系都较弱,且在不同的气候带存在差异。我们的研究结果还表明,农田的农业管理措施和草地较好的土壤质量可能会缓冲短期温度和降水变化的影响。我们的结论是,这项欧盟尺度的SQI研究提供了土壤质量状况的清晰视图,也可以有效地为决策者采取可持续的管理措施来改善土壤质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Land Degradation & Development
Land Degradation & Development 农林科学-环境科学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
5.5 months
期刊介绍: Land Degradation & Development is an international journal which seeks to promote rational study of the recognition, monitoring, control and rehabilitation of degradation in terrestrial environments. The journal focuses on: - what land degradation is; - what causes land degradation; - the impacts of land degradation - the scale of land degradation; - the history, current status or future trends of land degradation; - avoidance, mitigation and control of land degradation; - remedial actions to rehabilitate or restore degraded land; - sustainable land management.
期刊最新文献
Toward Farmland Multifunctionality and Sustainability Under the Greater Food Concept: Exploring the Integrated Use of Farmland (IUF) in Hilly and Mountainous Areas Next-Generation Approach and Mechanistic Insight Mediated Beneficial Plant-Microbe Interactions to Foster Resilient Agroecosystems and Sustain Soil Health Multi-Source Rainfall Erosivity Fusion Based on Machine Learning Models Impact of Construction Land Transition on Staple Crop Diversity in China Machine Learning‐Based Drought Stress Mapping Using Landsat and Sentinel‐2 Imagery: A Remote Sensing Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1