Preventing digital distraction in secondary classrooms: A quasi-experimental study

IF 8.9 1区 教育学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers & Education Pub Date : 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105223
Jiyeon Park, Jeniffer Paxtle-Granjeno, Min Wook Ok, Mikyung Shin, Erin Wilson
{"title":"Preventing digital distraction in secondary classrooms: A quasi-experimental study","authors":"Jiyeon Park, Jeniffer Paxtle-Granjeno, Min Wook Ok, Mikyung Shin, Erin Wilson","doi":"10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technology serves as an effective learning tool in K-12 classrooms, yet its presence often leads to distraction, diverting students’ attention and disrupting their focus on primary activities. It is important for educators to effectively integrate technology while minimizing distractions. This study employs a quasi-experimental design utilizing a pre- and post-survey control group model to assess digital distraction among secondary students enrolled in Spanish classes. The experimental group was provided with digital distraction prevention strategies, including (a) lessons targeting digital distraction and establishing behavior expectations, (b) weekly self-checklists, and (c) visual prompts integrated into daily lessons, while the control group participated in business-as-usual instruction. Pre- and post-survey data were analyzed through Cumulative Link Mixed Models. Overall, digital distraction prevention strategies showed mixed outcomes across attentional impulsiveness, online vigilance, multitasking behaviors, and emotion regulation; only a significant reduction in digital distraction related to phone use was found (odd ratio = 0.29, p = .034). Although students in the experimental group reported a decline in estimated time spent on digital distractions compared to the control group, the difference was not statistically significant. These findings highlight the complexity of addressing digital distraction and underscore the need for continued development and evaluation of effective strategies in K-12 classrooms. Limitations and future research are also discussed.","PeriodicalId":10568,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105223","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Technology serves as an effective learning tool in K-12 classrooms, yet its presence often leads to distraction, diverting students’ attention and disrupting their focus on primary activities. It is important for educators to effectively integrate technology while minimizing distractions. This study employs a quasi-experimental design utilizing a pre- and post-survey control group model to assess digital distraction among secondary students enrolled in Spanish classes. The experimental group was provided with digital distraction prevention strategies, including (a) lessons targeting digital distraction and establishing behavior expectations, (b) weekly self-checklists, and (c) visual prompts integrated into daily lessons, while the control group participated in business-as-usual instruction. Pre- and post-survey data were analyzed through Cumulative Link Mixed Models. Overall, digital distraction prevention strategies showed mixed outcomes across attentional impulsiveness, online vigilance, multitasking behaviors, and emotion regulation; only a significant reduction in digital distraction related to phone use was found (odd ratio = 0.29, p = .034). Although students in the experimental group reported a decline in estimated time spent on digital distractions compared to the control group, the difference was not statistically significant. These findings highlight the complexity of addressing digital distraction and underscore the need for continued development and evaluation of effective strategies in K-12 classrooms. Limitations and future research are also discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
防止中学课堂上的数字分心:准实验研究
在 K-12 年级的课堂上,技术是一种有效的学习工具,但它的存在往往会分散学生的注意力,干扰他们对主要活动的关注。教育工作者必须在有效整合技术的同时,尽量减少分心现象。本研究采用准实验设计,利用前后调查对照组模式,对西班牙语班中学生的数码分心情况进行评估。实验组采用了预防数码分心的策略,包括(a)针对数码分心和建立行为预期的课程,(b)每周自我检查表,以及(c)融入日常课程的视觉提示,而对照组则参加了照常教学。通过累积链接混合模型对前后调查数据进行了分析。总体而言,数字分心预防策略在注意力冲动、在线警惕性、多任务处理行为和情绪调节方面的效果参差不齐;只有与手机使用相关的数字分心现象显著减少(奇数比 = 0.29,p = .034)。尽管与对照组相比,实验组的学生估计花在数字分心上的时间有所减少,但差异在统计学上并不显著。这些研究结果凸显了解决数字分心问题的复杂性,并强调了在 K-12 课堂中继续开发和评估有效策略的必要性。此外,还讨论了研究的局限性和未来研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Education
Computers & Education 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
5.80%
发文量
204
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Education seeks to advance understanding of how digital technology can improve education by publishing high-quality research that expands both theory and practice. The journal welcomes research papers exploring the pedagogical applications of digital technology, with a focus broad enough to appeal to the wider education community.
期刊最新文献
“Digital constructivists, activators or presenters? Different profiles of technology integration among swiss upper secondary school teachers” Preventing digital distraction in secondary classrooms: A quasi-experimental study How does social support detected automatically in discussion forums relate to online learning burnout? The moderating role of students’ self-regulated learning Virtual vs. Traditional Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies The effects of different metacognitive patterns on students' self-regulated learning in blended learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1