Evaluation of simultaneous energy production and biotic and abiotic nitrate removal in microbial fuel cells (MFCs): Selection of the most suitable MFC by a multi-criteria decision methodology

IF 7.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Process Safety and Environmental Protection Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1016/j.psep.2024.12.071
Nevim Genç, Elif Durna Pişkin
{"title":"Evaluation of simultaneous energy production and biotic and abiotic nitrate removal in microbial fuel cells (MFCs): Selection of the most suitable MFC by a multi-criteria decision methodology","authors":"Nevim Genç,&nbsp;Elif Durna Pişkin","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2024.12.071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Microbial fuel cell (MFC)’s are sustainable resource recovery technologies that produce green energy. While sewage sludge fed with dairy industry wastewater was oxidized in the anode, the energy production and treatment potentials of MFCs in which nitrate was reduced under abiotic-biotic conditions in the cathode compartment were evaluated. It was determined how the performance changed when the conditions of the cathode compartment were changed as biotic (heterotrophic-autotrophic) and abiotic. The performance of the MFC was evaluated by anodic and cathodic coulombic efficiency (CE), maximum power density, chemical oxygen demand (COD) and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> removal. Considering the MFC performance criteria and the cost of the carbon source added to the catholytes, the preference order of the MFCs was determined using a multi-criterion decision methodology called the PROMETHEE approach, which allowed for pairwise comparison of alternatives on a criterion basis using preference functions. Accordingly, abiotic MFC˃autotrophic MFC˃heterotrophic MFC preference order was obtained. It was revealed that all criteria except nitrate removal efficiency had a positive effect on the selection of abiotic MFC. Although the nitrate removal efficiency in abiotic MFC was lower than biotic MFCs, the energy production performance was determined to be quite high.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"194 ","pages":"Pages 807-815"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582024016422","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Microbial fuel cell (MFC)’s are sustainable resource recovery technologies that produce green energy. While sewage sludge fed with dairy industry wastewater was oxidized in the anode, the energy production and treatment potentials of MFCs in which nitrate was reduced under abiotic-biotic conditions in the cathode compartment were evaluated. It was determined how the performance changed when the conditions of the cathode compartment were changed as biotic (heterotrophic-autotrophic) and abiotic. The performance of the MFC was evaluated by anodic and cathodic coulombic efficiency (CE), maximum power density, chemical oxygen demand (COD) and NO3- removal. Considering the MFC performance criteria and the cost of the carbon source added to the catholytes, the preference order of the MFCs was determined using a multi-criterion decision methodology called the PROMETHEE approach, which allowed for pairwise comparison of alternatives on a criterion basis using preference functions. Accordingly, abiotic MFC˃autotrophic MFC˃heterotrophic MFC preference order was obtained. It was revealed that all criteria except nitrate removal efficiency had a positive effect on the selection of abiotic MFC. Although the nitrate removal efficiency in abiotic MFC was lower than biotic MFCs, the energy production performance was determined to be quite high.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微生物燃料电池(MFC)中同时能源生产和生物和非生物硝酸盐去除的评估:通过多标准决策方法选择最合适的MFC
微生物燃料电池(MFC)是一种产生绿色能源的可持续资源回收技术。以乳业废水为原料的污水污泥在阳极氧化的同时,对阴极室非生物-生物条件下硝酸盐还原mfc的产能和处理潜力进行了评价。研究了阴极室条件在生物(异养-自养)和非生物条件下的性能变化情况。通过阳极和阴极库仑效率(CE)、最大功率密度、化学需氧量(COD)和NO3-去除率对MFC的性能进行了评价。考虑到MFC性能标准和添加到阴极液中的碳源成本,使用称为PROMETHEE方法的多准则决策方法确定MFC的偏好顺序,该方法允许使用偏好函数在标准基础上对备选方案进行两两比较。由此得出了非生物MFC→自养MFC→异养MFC的优先顺序。结果表明,除硝态氮去除效率外,其余指标对非生物MFC的选择均有积极影响。虽然非生物MFC的硝酸盐去除效率低于生物MFC,但其产能性能相当高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Process Safety and Environmental Protection
Process Safety and Environmental Protection 环境科学-工程:化工
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
929
审稿时长
8.0 months
期刊介绍: The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice. PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers. PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.
期刊最新文献
Preparation and wetting mechanism of coal seam composite fracturing fluid modified with κ-carrageenan based on red algae extract Hazard of thermal runaway ejection in lithium-ion batteries and passive protection strategies Phenol-induced shifts in aerobic granular sludge: Linking granule properties, microbial dynamics, and treatment performance Boosted photo-Fenton degradation of moxifloxacin antibiotic over LaFeO3 perovskites assembled boron nitride quantum dots Biologically safe and environmentally friendly evaluation of dust suppressants by experimental assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1