Evaluation of simultaneous energy production and biotic and abiotic nitrate removal in microbial fuel cells (MFCs): Selection of the most suitable MFC by a multi-criteria decision methodology
{"title":"Evaluation of simultaneous energy production and biotic and abiotic nitrate removal in microbial fuel cells (MFCs): Selection of the most suitable MFC by a multi-criteria decision methodology","authors":"Nevim Genç, Elif Durna Pişkin","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2024.12.071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Microbial fuel cell (MFC)’s are sustainable resource recovery technologies that produce green energy. While sewage sludge fed with dairy industry wastewater was oxidized in the anode, the energy production and treatment potentials of MFCs in which nitrate was reduced under abiotic-biotic conditions in the cathode compartment were evaluated. It was determined how the performance changed when the conditions of the cathode compartment were changed as biotic (heterotrophic-autotrophic) and abiotic. The performance of the MFC was evaluated by anodic and cathodic coulombic efficiency (CE), maximum power density, chemical oxygen demand (COD) and NO<ce:inf loc=\"post\">3</ce:inf><ce:sup loc=\"post\">-</ce:sup> removal. Considering the MFC performance criteria and the cost of the carbon source added to the catholytes, the preference order of the MFCs was determined using a multi-criterion decision methodology called the PROMETHEE approach, which allowed for pairwise comparison of alternatives on a criterion basis using preference functions. Accordingly, abiotic MFC˃autotrophic MFC˃heterotrophic MFC preference order was obtained. It was revealed that all criteria except nitrate removal efficiency had a positive effect on the selection of abiotic MFC. Although the nitrate removal efficiency in abiotic MFC was lower than biotic MFCs, the energy production performance was determined to be quite high.","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2024.12.071","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Microbial fuel cell (MFC)’s are sustainable resource recovery technologies that produce green energy. While sewage sludge fed with dairy industry wastewater was oxidized in the anode, the energy production and treatment potentials of MFCs in which nitrate was reduced under abiotic-biotic conditions in the cathode compartment were evaluated. It was determined how the performance changed when the conditions of the cathode compartment were changed as biotic (heterotrophic-autotrophic) and abiotic. The performance of the MFC was evaluated by anodic and cathodic coulombic efficiency (CE), maximum power density, chemical oxygen demand (COD) and NO3- removal. Considering the MFC performance criteria and the cost of the carbon source added to the catholytes, the preference order of the MFCs was determined using a multi-criterion decision methodology called the PROMETHEE approach, which allowed for pairwise comparison of alternatives on a criterion basis using preference functions. Accordingly, abiotic MFC˃autotrophic MFC˃heterotrophic MFC preference order was obtained. It was revealed that all criteria except nitrate removal efficiency had a positive effect on the selection of abiotic MFC. Although the nitrate removal efficiency in abiotic MFC was lower than biotic MFCs, the energy production performance was determined to be quite high.
期刊介绍:
The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice.
PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers.
PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.