Neogene drainage evolution of SW Anatolia (Türkiye): Integration of morphotectonics, drainage and denudation analyses

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL Earth Surface Processes and Landforms Pub Date : 2024-11-24 DOI:10.1002/esp.6038
Pieter S. van Heiningen, Nuretdin Kaymakci
{"title":"Neogene drainage evolution of SW Anatolia (Türkiye): Integration of morphotectonics, drainage and denudation analyses","authors":"Pieter S. van Heiningen,&nbsp;Nuretdin Kaymakci","doi":"10.1002/esp.6038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study integrates denudation analysis with morphotectonic characteristics, facies associations and drainage analysis to investigate the landscape evolution of SW Anatolia. Age-Elevation Relationship (AER) plots of published thermochronological data from drainage divides, valleys and preserved paleo-geomorphological landscape remnants provide insight into the region's drainage evolution. Cooling and denudation events identify the timing of divide formation, windgap formation and divide breaching, which leads to watergap formation.</p><p>We have subdivided SW Anatolia into distinct morphotectonic domains. Among these, the Gediz and Büyük Menderes faults and the Selimiye Shear Zone fragmented the Menderes Metamorphic Core Complex into three each of which experienced different cooling histories based on denudation analysis utilizing various low-temperature thermochronometers.</p><p>Hypsometric integral and channel profile analyses demonstrate significant variation in landscape maturity and drainage basin modifications over time. These analyses, combined with the interpretation and mapping of windgaps, watergaps and stream deflections, as well as the depositional environments of sediments and volcanic sequences, enable the reconstruction of drainage patterns from the early Miocene to Recent.</p><p>During the middle Miocene, the Sakarya drainage basin dominated central and eastern SW Anatolia, with the Gediz drainage basin being a minor part of the Küçük Menderes basin. The Büyük Menderes drainage basin, in contrast, drained the southern portion of SW Anatolia, while the Bakırçay catchment extended into the northern Gediz basin. By the late Miocene, the Sakarya drainage basin had lost a significant portion of its hinterland to the Gediz basin and several newly isolated basins, while also capturing the Burdur and Beyşehir basins, along with the mid- and upstream sections of the Büyük Menderes basin, thereby reducing its area by two-thirds. In the Pliocene, the Gediz drainage basin contracted by approximately 80%, while the Büyük Menderes basin expanded to absorb the Gediz and Tavas basins. During the Quaternary, the Büyük Menderes basin further shrank by around 60% as isolated basins formed in the east. Recent tectonic activity has led to the Gediz basin recapturing parts of its upstream area, while the Büyük Menderes basin regained previously isolated sections of the Gediz basin. The Dalaman and Eşençay basins also captured upstream isolated basins, while the Burdur basin was captured by the Aksu River, isolating the Beyşehir basin from Burdur.</p><p>These episodes of drainage reorganization are driven by dynamic topography, influenced by slab-edge processes and intensified by the westward escape of the Anatolian Block. The westward motion, combined with slab-tear-driven vertical movements, has led to substantial reconfiguration of the drainage networks in SW Anatolia over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":11408,"journal":{"name":"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms","volume":"49 15","pages":"5284-5308"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/esp.6038","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study integrates denudation analysis with morphotectonic characteristics, facies associations and drainage analysis to investigate the landscape evolution of SW Anatolia. Age-Elevation Relationship (AER) plots of published thermochronological data from drainage divides, valleys and preserved paleo-geomorphological landscape remnants provide insight into the region's drainage evolution. Cooling and denudation events identify the timing of divide formation, windgap formation and divide breaching, which leads to watergap formation.

We have subdivided SW Anatolia into distinct morphotectonic domains. Among these, the Gediz and Büyük Menderes faults and the Selimiye Shear Zone fragmented the Menderes Metamorphic Core Complex into three each of which experienced different cooling histories based on denudation analysis utilizing various low-temperature thermochronometers.

Hypsometric integral and channel profile analyses demonstrate significant variation in landscape maturity and drainage basin modifications over time. These analyses, combined with the interpretation and mapping of windgaps, watergaps and stream deflections, as well as the depositional environments of sediments and volcanic sequences, enable the reconstruction of drainage patterns from the early Miocene to Recent.

During the middle Miocene, the Sakarya drainage basin dominated central and eastern SW Anatolia, with the Gediz drainage basin being a minor part of the Küçük Menderes basin. The Büyük Menderes drainage basin, in contrast, drained the southern portion of SW Anatolia, while the Bakırçay catchment extended into the northern Gediz basin. By the late Miocene, the Sakarya drainage basin had lost a significant portion of its hinterland to the Gediz basin and several newly isolated basins, while also capturing the Burdur and Beyşehir basins, along with the mid- and upstream sections of the Büyük Menderes basin, thereby reducing its area by two-thirds. In the Pliocene, the Gediz drainage basin contracted by approximately 80%, while the Büyük Menderes basin expanded to absorb the Gediz and Tavas basins. During the Quaternary, the Büyük Menderes basin further shrank by around 60% as isolated basins formed in the east. Recent tectonic activity has led to the Gediz basin recapturing parts of its upstream area, while the Büyük Menderes basin regained previously isolated sections of the Gediz basin. The Dalaman and Eşençay basins also captured upstream isolated basins, while the Burdur basin was captured by the Aksu River, isolating the Beyşehir basin from Burdur.

These episodes of drainage reorganization are driven by dynamic topography, influenced by slab-edge processes and intensified by the westward escape of the Anatolian Block. The westward motion, combined with slab-tear-driven vertical movements, has led to substantial reconfiguration of the drainage networks in SW Anatolia over time.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.10%
发文量
215
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Earth Surface Processes and Landforms is an interdisciplinary international journal concerned with: the interactions between surface processes and landforms and landscapes; that lead to physical, chemical and biological changes; and which in turn create; current landscapes and the geological record of past landscapes. Its focus is core to both physical geographical and geological communities, and also the wider geosciences
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Neogene drainage evolution of SW Anatolia (Türkiye): Integration of morphotectonics, drainage and denudation analyses Predicting flow resistance in rough-bed rivers from topographic roughness: Review and open questions Assessing proxy methods for measuring bedrock erodibility in fluvial impact erosion Controls on glacial kettle morphology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1