Comparison of thoracoscopic-guided intercostal nerve block and ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block in postoperative analgesia of uniportal video-assisted lobectomy: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

IF 10.1 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY International journal of surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1097/JS9.0000000000002165
Yan Li, Luyao Wei, Jian-Hui Du, Jin-Xian He, Xia Xu, Li-Hong Hu
{"title":"Comparison of thoracoscopic-guided intercostal nerve block and ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block in postoperative analgesia of uniportal video-assisted lobectomy: a pilot randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Yan Li, Luyao Wei, Jian-Hui Du, Jin-Xian He, Xia Xu, Li-Hong Hu","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block (UINB) and thoracoscopic-guided intercostal nerve block (TINB) are often used for analgesia after thoracic surgery. Herein, we compared the application of TINB and UINB for analgesia after uniportal video-assisted lobectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty patients were randomly allocated into two groups: UINB and TINB. The surgical time of intercostal nerve block (INB), the success rate of the first needle, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, the time of the first patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) press, the time for removing the thoracic drainage tube, consumption of sufentanil and the number of PCIA presses within 24 hours postoperatively, and adverse reactions (ARs) were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The surgical time of INB was significantly shorter in the TINB group than in the UINB group ( P < 0.001). The time of the first press of PCIA was significantly earlier in the TINB group than in the UINB group ( P < 0.001). The success rate of the first needle was significantly higher in the TINB group than in the UINB group ( P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding VAS scores, time for removing the thoracic drainage tube, the consumption of sufentanil, the number of PCIA presses within 24 hours postoperatively, and ARs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TINB and UINB have similar analgesic effects after uniportal video-assisted lobectomy. However, TINB demonstrates shorter surgical time and a higher success rate than UINB.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1995-2001"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002165","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block (UINB) and thoracoscopic-guided intercostal nerve block (TINB) are often used for analgesia after thoracic surgery. Herein, we compared the application of TINB and UINB for analgesia after uniportal video-assisted lobectomy.

Methods: Sixty patients were randomly allocated into two groups: UINB and TINB. The surgical time of intercostal nerve block (INB), the success rate of the first needle, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, the time of the first patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) press, the time for removing the thoracic drainage tube, consumption of sufentanil and the number of PCIA presses within 24 hours postoperatively, and adverse reactions (ARs) were compared between the two groups.

Results: The surgical time of INB was significantly shorter in the TINB group than in the UINB group ( P < 0.001). The time of the first press of PCIA was significantly earlier in the TINB group than in the UINB group ( P < 0.001). The success rate of the first needle was significantly higher in the TINB group than in the UINB group ( P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding VAS scores, time for removing the thoracic drainage tube, the consumption of sufentanil, the number of PCIA presses within 24 hours postoperatively, and ARs.

Conclusion: TINB and UINB have similar analgesic effects after uniportal video-assisted lobectomy. However, TINB demonstrates shorter surgical time and a higher success rate than UINB.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胸腔镜引导下肋间神经阻滞与超声引导下肋间神经阻滞在单门静脉视频肺叶切除术术后镇痛中的比较:一项随机对照试验。
背景:超声引导下肋间神经阻滞(unib)和胸腔镜引导下肋间神经阻滞(TINB)是胸外科术后常用的镇痛方法。在此,我们比较了TINB和unib在单门静脉视频辅助肺叶切除术后镇痛的应用。方法:60例患者随机分为UINB组和TINB组。比较两组患者肋间神经阻滞(INB)手术时间、第一针穿刺成功率、视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分、患者自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)按压时间、拔管时间、术后24 h内舒芬太尼用量及PCIA按压次数、不良反应(ARs)。结果:TINB组的INB手术时间明显短于unib组(P结论:TINB与unib在单门静脉视频辅助肺叶切除术后的镇痛效果相似。然而,TINB手术时间比unib短,成功率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.
期刊最新文献
New insight into the risk stratification and treatment priority of breast cancer: TMT scoring system. Re-examining repair strategies for descending thoracic aortic aneurysm: balancing early benefits and long-term durability. Comment on "Temporomandibular joint disc position affects condylar bone modeling-a randomized controlled clinical trial". A Commentary on "Impact of preoperative frailty on venous thromboembolism risk following total hip and knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis". Ferroptosis in renal cell carcinoma: integrative multi-omics insights and therapeutic perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1