Bone Regeneration Following Implantoplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study with Long-Term Radiographic Assessment.

Philippe Khayat, David Aidan, Javier Calatrava, Hom-Lay Wang
{"title":"Bone Regeneration Following Implantoplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study with Long-Term Radiographic Assessment.","authors":"Philippe Khayat, David Aidan, Javier Calatrava, Hom-Lay Wang","doi":"10.11607/prd.7422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Implantoplasty involves mechanically modifying the exposed implant surface by removing macro- and micro-structures and is typically considered a resective approach. The potential for bone regeneration with implantoplasty alone has not yet been studied. This research aimed to evaluate long-term changes in peri-implant bone levels without using regenerative materials. 56 patients (70 implants) were included in the study and were followed for up to 10 years, with a mean observation time of 59 months (~5 years). The implants were evaluated retrospectively through a radiographic, as well as clinical (bleeding on probing and suppuration) analysis. Out of the 70 implants, 11 (15.7%) were lost due to disease recurrence and additional bone loss. One implant (1.4%) experienced up to 1.0 mm of bone loss, 15 implants (21.4%) showed no change in marginal bone levels (MBL), and 43 implants (61.5%) gained bone up to 4.8 mm, all without the use of any graft material or membrane. The overall mean MBL change for the remaining 59 implants at the end of the follow-up period (84.3%) was a gain of 1.27 mm. Implantoplasty alone without osseous surgery, flap repositioning, or using graft material or membrane; may be a viable option for managing peri-implantitis defects. However, future randomized clinical trials with larger sample sizes are necessary to validate current findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94231,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.7422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Implantoplasty involves mechanically modifying the exposed implant surface by removing macro- and micro-structures and is typically considered a resective approach. The potential for bone regeneration with implantoplasty alone has not yet been studied. This research aimed to evaluate long-term changes in peri-implant bone levels without using regenerative materials. 56 patients (70 implants) were included in the study and were followed for up to 10 years, with a mean observation time of 59 months (~5 years). The implants were evaluated retrospectively through a radiographic, as well as clinical (bleeding on probing and suppuration) analysis. Out of the 70 implants, 11 (15.7%) were lost due to disease recurrence and additional bone loss. One implant (1.4%) experienced up to 1.0 mm of bone loss, 15 implants (21.4%) showed no change in marginal bone levels (MBL), and 43 implants (61.5%) gained bone up to 4.8 mm, all without the use of any graft material or membrane. The overall mean MBL change for the remaining 59 implants at the end of the follow-up period (84.3%) was a gain of 1.27 mm. Implantoplasty alone without osseous surgery, flap repositioning, or using graft material or membrane; may be a viable option for managing peri-implantitis defects. However, future randomized clinical trials with larger sample sizes are necessary to validate current findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bone Regeneration Following Implantoplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study with Long-Term Radiographic Assessment. Immature Tooth Autotransplantation with Buccal Bone Fenestration Treated with GBR and Immature Tooth Autotransplantation in Regenerated Bone: Proof of Principles with Medium- (55 Months) to Long-Term (252 Months) Follow-ups. Influence of Opacifiers and Different Dentin Thicknesses on the Optical Properties of a Darkened Teeth with Limited Sound Tissue Reduction. Revolutionizing Laminate Veneer Bonding: Laser Versus Acid Etching of Enamel. The Effect of Cement- Versus Screw-Retained Implant Positioning in the Esthetic Zone on Emergence Angle: A Proof-of-Principle Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1