Bone Regeneration Following Implantoplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study with Long-Term Radiographic Assessment.

Philippe Khayat, David Aidan, Javier Calatrava, Hom-Lay Wang
{"title":"Bone Regeneration Following Implantoplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study with Long-Term Radiographic Assessment.","authors":"Philippe Khayat, David Aidan, Javier Calatrava, Hom-Lay Wang","doi":"10.11607/prd.7422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Implantoplasty involves mechanically modifying the exposed implant surface by removing macro- and micro-structures and is typically considered a resective approach. The potential for bone regeneration with implantoplasty alone has not yet been studied. This research aimed to evaluate long-term changes in peri-implant bone levels without using regenerative materials. 56 patients (70 implants) were included in the study and were followed for up to 10 years, with a mean observation time of 59 months (~5 years). The implants were evaluated retrospectively through a radiographic, as well as clinical (bleeding on probing and suppuration) analysis. Out of the 70 implants, 11 (15.7%) were lost due to disease recurrence and additional bone loss. One implant (1.4%) experienced up to 1.0 mm of bone loss, 15 implants (21.4%) showed no change in marginal bone levels (MBL), and 43 implants (61.5%) gained bone up to 4.8 mm, all without the use of any graft material or membrane. The overall mean MBL change for the remaining 59 implants at the end of the follow-up period (84.3%) was a gain of 1.27 mm. Implantoplasty alone without osseous surgery, flap repositioning, or using graft material or membrane; may be a viable option for managing peri-implantitis defects. However, future randomized clinical trials with larger sample sizes are necessary to validate current findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94231,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.7422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Implantoplasty involves mechanically modifying the exposed implant surface by removing macro- and micro-structures and is typically considered a resective approach. The potential for bone regeneration with implantoplasty alone has not yet been studied. This research aimed to evaluate long-term changes in peri-implant bone levels without using regenerative materials. 56 patients (70 implants) were included in the study and were followed for up to 10 years, with a mean observation time of 59 months (~5 years). The implants were evaluated retrospectively through a radiographic, as well as clinical (bleeding on probing and suppuration) analysis. Out of the 70 implants, 11 (15.7%) were lost due to disease recurrence and additional bone loss. One implant (1.4%) experienced up to 1.0 mm of bone loss, 15 implants (21.4%) showed no change in marginal bone levels (MBL), and 43 implants (61.5%) gained bone up to 4.8 mm, all without the use of any graft material or membrane. The overall mean MBL change for the remaining 59 implants at the end of the follow-up period (84.3%) was a gain of 1.27 mm. Implantoplasty alone without osseous surgery, flap repositioning, or using graft material or membrane; may be a viable option for managing peri-implantitis defects. However, future randomized clinical trials with larger sample sizes are necessary to validate current findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
植骨成形术后骨再生:一项长期影像学评估的回顾性队列研究。
种植体成形术包括通过去除宏观和微观结构来机械地改变暴露的种植体表面,通常被认为是一种分离的方法。单纯植骨成形术的骨再生潜力尚未被研究。本研究旨在评估在不使用再生材料的情况下种植体周围骨水平的长期变化。56例患者(70颗种植体)纳入研究,随访时间长达10年,平均观察时间59个月(~5年)。通过x线片以及临床(探诊出血和化脓)分析对植入物进行回顾性评估。在70个种植体中,11个(15.7%)因疾病复发和额外的骨质流失而丢失。1个种植体(1.4%)的骨丢失达1.0 mm, 15个种植体(21.4%)的边缘骨水平(MBL)没有变化,43个种植体(61.5%)的骨增加达4.8 mm,所有种植体都没有使用任何移植材料或膜。在随访期结束时,其余59个种植体的总体平均MBL变化(84.3%)增加1.27 mm。单纯种植成形术,无需骨外科手术、皮瓣重新定位或使用移植物材料或膜;可能是治疗种植体周围炎缺陷的可行选择。然而,未来需要更大样本量的随机临床试验来验证当前的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Subperiosteal Tissue Tacking as a Novel Approach to Recreate the Lost Hard and Soft Tissue Framework: Case Series and Illustrated Clinical Considerations. The Slice Harvesting Technique for Tuberosity Soft Tissue Grafts: A Case Report. Vertical Guided Bone Regeneration: Leukocyte and PRF Bone-Block vs A Mixture of Autogenous Bone with DBBM. A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Trial with Follow-up Up to 1 Year After Implant Loading. A Volume-Stable Collagen Matrix (VCMX) to Treat Single Gingival Recessions Associated with Partially Restored Noncarious Cervical Lesions: A Case Series. Disease Resolution Following the Treatment of Peri-implant Diseases: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1