Examining the impact of rhythmic breathing and progressive muscle relaxation on acute pain following inguinal hernia repair: a parallel randomized clinical trial.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies Pub Date : 2024-12-21 DOI:10.1186/s12906-024-04729-2
Hosein Bagheri, Mobin Mottahedi, Seyedeh Solmaz Talebi, Sara Mehralizade, Hossein Ebrahimi
{"title":"Examining the impact of rhythmic breathing and progressive muscle relaxation on acute pain following inguinal hernia repair: a parallel randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Hosein Bagheri, Mobin Mottahedi, Seyedeh Solmaz Talebi, Sara Mehralizade, Hossein Ebrahimi","doi":"10.1186/s12906-024-04729-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute postoperative pain is often reported after repair of inguinal hernia and can negatively impact patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes. This includes delayed wound healing, longer hospitalization, and increased health care costs. Non-pharmacological techniques like Progressive Muscle Relaxation (PMR) and Rhythmic Breathing (RB) have been suggested as possible interventions for managing this type of pain. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of PMR and RB on postoperative pain following repair of inguinal hernia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This parallel randomized controlled trial was conducted to examine 120 patients in the age range of 18 to 75 years with inclusion criteria: Repair of Inguinal Hernia under general anesthesia and no addiction to drugs and narcotics. These patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: the RB group, PMR group, or the control group (which received standard care). The RB and PMR interventions were administered at 3, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery. The primary outcome measure was the intensity of pain at the surgical site, assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The secondary outcome measure was the amount of rescue analgesic (Pethidine). The one-way analysis of variance, Chi-square, post-hoc test, and repeated measures ANOVA were used for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following the interventions, participants in both the RB and PMR groups exhibited significantly lower levels of acute pain after inguinal hernia repair compared to the control group across all four time periods, except at 12 h postoperatively in the RB group. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the RB and PMR groups. Additionally, the amount of pethidine consumed in the control group was significantly higher compared to the two experimental groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the results, both RB and PMR were found to be effective techniques in reducing patients' pain. Therefore, it is recommended that healthcare team members, particularly nurses, actively learn and teach both RB and PMR.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Registered in the Iranian registry of clinical trials ( www.irct.ir ) in 31/01/2023 with the following code: IRCT20200206046395N2.</p>","PeriodicalId":9128,"journal":{"name":"BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies","volume":"24 1","pages":"421"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11662604/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-024-04729-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute postoperative pain is often reported after repair of inguinal hernia and can negatively impact patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes. This includes delayed wound healing, longer hospitalization, and increased health care costs. Non-pharmacological techniques like Progressive Muscle Relaxation (PMR) and Rhythmic Breathing (RB) have been suggested as possible interventions for managing this type of pain. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of PMR and RB on postoperative pain following repair of inguinal hernia.

Methods: This parallel randomized controlled trial was conducted to examine 120 patients in the age range of 18 to 75 years with inclusion criteria: Repair of Inguinal Hernia under general anesthesia and no addiction to drugs and narcotics. These patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: the RB group, PMR group, or the control group (which received standard care). The RB and PMR interventions were administered at 3, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery. The primary outcome measure was the intensity of pain at the surgical site, assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The secondary outcome measure was the amount of rescue analgesic (Pethidine). The one-way analysis of variance, Chi-square, post-hoc test, and repeated measures ANOVA were used for data analysis.

Results: Following the interventions, participants in both the RB and PMR groups exhibited significantly lower levels of acute pain after inguinal hernia repair compared to the control group across all four time periods, except at 12 h postoperatively in the RB group. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the RB and PMR groups. Additionally, the amount of pethidine consumed in the control group was significantly higher compared to the two experimental groups.

Conclusions: Based on the results, both RB and PMR were found to be effective techniques in reducing patients' pain. Therefore, it is recommended that healthcare team members, particularly nurses, actively learn and teach both RB and PMR.

Trial registration: Registered in the Iranian registry of clinical trials ( www.irct.ir ) in 31/01/2023 with the following code: IRCT20200206046395N2.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
检查有节奏呼吸和渐进式肌肉放松对腹股沟疝修复后急性疼痛的影响:一项平行随机临床试验。
背景:腹股沟疝修补术后经常报告急性术后疼痛,并可能对患者满意度和临床结果产生负面影响。这包括伤口愈合延迟、住院时间延长和医疗费用增加。非药物技术,如渐进式肌肉放松(PMR)和节律性呼吸(RB)已被建议作为可能的干预措施来管理这种类型的疼痛。本研究的目的是探讨PMR和RB对腹股沟疝修补术后疼痛的影响。方法:采用平行随机对照试验,选取年龄在18 ~ 75岁的120例患者,纳入标准:全麻下腹股沟疝修补术,无药物和麻醉剂成瘾。这些患者被随机分配到三组中的一组:RB组、PMR组或对照组(接受标准治疗)。分别于术后3、6、12和24小时进行RB和PMR干预。主要结局指标是手术部位的疼痛强度,使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)进行评估。次要观察指标为救援镇痛药(哌替啶)的用量。资料分析采用单因素方差分析、卡方检验、事后检验和重复测量方差分析。结果:干预后,除RB组术后12小时外,RB组和PMR组的参与者在所有四个时间段内都比对照组表现出明显较低的腹股沟疝修补术后急性疼痛水平。然而,RB组和PMR组之间无统计学差异。此外,对照组的哌啶消耗量明显高于两个实验组。结论:基于结果,RB和PMR都是减轻患者疼痛的有效技术。因此,建议医疗团队成员,特别是护士,积极学习和教授RB和PMR。试验注册:于2023年1月31日在伊朗临床试验注册中心(www.irct.ir)注册,代码:IRCT20200206046395N2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
300
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Remote Ischemic Conditioning for Non-Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (RIC-NPDR): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Evaluation of antiviral activity indicators in selected medicinal plants used traditionally for treatment of respiratory viral infections. Royal jelly protein hydrolysates accelerate in vitro diabetic wound healing by enhancing keratinocytes functions and suppressing macrophage-mediated inflammation. An integrated network pharmacology and proteomics approach reveals the anti-fibrotic effect of Fushen Granule on peritoneal fibrosis. Effect of biodegradable microneedle acupuncture for symptom relief moderate or milder atopic dermatitis: a study protocol for a multicenter, randomized, sham-controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1