Single versus two dental implants retained mandibular over dentures: comparison of function, patient satisfaction, oral health-related quality of life and success of treatment.

IF 1.6 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES BMC Research Notes Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1186/s13104-024-07040-y

Rasika Manori Jayasinghe, Manjula Attygalla, Manil Christopher Nishan Fonseka, Sachith P Abeysundara, Indika Priyanthi Thilakumara, Ruwan Duminda Jayasinghe

{"title":"Single versus two dental implants retained mandibular over dentures: comparison of function, patient satisfaction, oral health-related quality of life and success of treatment.","authors":"Rasika Manori Jayasinghe, Manjula Attygalla, Manil Christopher Nishan Fonseka, Sachith P Abeysundara, Indika Priyanthi Thilakumara, Ruwan Duminda Jayasinghe","doi":"10.1186/s13104-024-07040-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the effectiveness of prosthetic rehabilitation of edentulous patients using conventional complete dentures (CD), single median dental implant retained over dentures (SIMOD) with over dentures retained by two dental implants (TIMOD).Methods: Thirty completely edentulous patients (fifteen each arm) presented to the Faculty of Dental Sciences, University of Peradeniya were randomly selected for the SIMOD or TIMOD groups. Patients were initially provided with CD. Surgical implant placement and prosthetic procedures were conducted at the Faculty of Dental Sciences. Osseointergration was confirmed, healing caps and then ball attachments were fixed on the implants. Clinical outcome was assessed by clinician, patient, and oral health related quality of life (OHRQOL) using OHIP-14 scale. Data were analyzed using Minitab P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant level.Results: Patient comfort, esthetics, chewing, speech, general satisfaction, denture retention, stability, and support with TIMOD & SIMOD had been significantly increased than CD (p < 0.05) at 3, 6 months, and 1 year review. OHIP-14 scale showed statistically significant improved oral health related quality of life with SIMOD and TIMOD compared to CD.Conclusion: SIMOD & TIMOD have improved outcome assessed by the patient and clinician and OHRQOL of the individual than CD. SIMOD can also be considered for successful management of completely edentulous patients.","PeriodicalId":9234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Research Notes","volume":"17 1","pages":"374"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11662757/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Research Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-024-07040-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of prosthetic rehabilitation of edentulous patients using conventional complete dentures (CD), single median dental implant retained over dentures (SIMOD) with over dentures retained by two dental implants (TIMOD).

Methods: Thirty completely edentulous patients (fifteen each arm) presented to the Faculty of Dental Sciences, University of Peradeniya were randomly selected for the SIMOD or TIMOD groups. Patients were initially provided with CD. Surgical implant placement and prosthetic procedures were conducted at the Faculty of Dental Sciences. Osseointergration was confirmed, healing caps and then ball attachments were fixed on the implants. Clinical outcome was assessed by clinician, patient, and oral health related quality of life (OHRQOL) using OHIP-14 scale. Data were analyzed using Minitab P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant level.

Results: Patient comfort, esthetics, chewing, speech, general satisfaction, denture retention, stability, and support with TIMOD & SIMOD had been significantly increased than CD (p < 0.05) at 3, 6 months, and 1 year review. OHIP-14 scale showed statistically significant improved oral health related quality of life with SIMOD and TIMOD compared to CD.

Conclusion: SIMOD & TIMOD have improved outcome assessed by the patient and clinician and OHRQOL of the individual than CD. SIMOD can also be considered for successful management of completely edentulous patients.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

单牙种植体与双牙种植体保留下颌假牙：功能、患者满意度、口腔健康相关生活质量和治疗成功的比较

目的：比较常规全口义齿（CD）、单中位种植体保留在义齿上（SIMOD）和双种植体保留在义齿上（TIMOD）对无牙患者的修复效果。方法：在Peradeniya大学口腔科学学院随机选择30例完全无牙患者，每组15例，分为SIMOD组和TIMOD组。最初为患者提供CD。外科种植体放置和修复程序在牙科科学学院进行。确认骨融合，将愈合帽和球状附着体固定在种植体上。采用OHIP-14量表对临床医生、患者和口腔健康相关生活质量（OHRQOL）进行评估。结果：患者舒适度、美观度、咀嚼、言语、总体满意度、义齿固位、稳定性和支持度均显著高于CD (P)。结论：与CD相比，SIMOD和TIMOD改善了患者和临床医师评估的结果和个体的OHRQOL。SIMOD也可以被认为是成功治疗全无牙患者的一种方法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

BMC Research Notes Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)

CiteScore

3.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

363

审稿时长

15 weeks

期刊介绍： BMC Research Notes publishes scientifically valid research outputs that cannot be considered as full research or methodology articles. We support the research community across all scientific and clinical disciplines by providing an open access forum for sharing data and useful information; this includes, but is not limited to, updates to previous work, additions to established methods, short publications, null results, research proposals and data management plans.