Opinion of Polish doctors on the use of futile therapy.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH European Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1093/eurpub/ckae202
Maria Damps, Maksymilian Gajda, Łukasz Wiktor, Elżbieta Byrska-Maciejasz, Beata Rybojad, Małgorzata Kowalska, Alicja Bartkowska-Śniatkowska, Anna Paprocka-Lipińska, Ewa Kucewicz-Czech
{"title":"Opinion of Polish doctors on the use of futile therapy.","authors":"Maria Damps, Maksymilian Gajda, Łukasz Wiktor, Elżbieta Byrska-Maciejasz, Beata Rybojad, Małgorzata Kowalska, Alicja Bartkowska-Śniatkowska, Anna Paprocka-Lipińska, Ewa Kucewicz-Czech","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckae202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The discontinuation of futile therapy is increasingly discussed in Polish clinical practice. Given the need to ensure patient well-being, it is essential to consider whether all clinical options resulting from medical progress should be used for every patient and on what grounds decisions to limit therapy should be based. The aim of our study was to determine the opinions of Polish medical doctors on this topic. We anonymously surveyed physicians across various specialties. An analysis of the collected data was carried out using descriptive and analytical methods. A total of 323 physicians participated in the study; 93% of them were aware of the problem of futile therapy in adults, with intensivists being significantly more aware (P = 0.002). Additionally, 95% of respondents supported the idea of discontinuing futile therapy, and over 68% used the therapy discontinuation protocol. Among the most common reasons for undertaking futile therapy, respondents cited fear of legal liability (93.5%), as well as fear of being accused of unethical behavior (62.2%) and fear before talking to the patient/patient's family and their reactions (57.9%). Respondents also identified factors that would facilitate making decisions about limiting futile therapy, including precise qualification criteria for limiting therapy and education in this area (95.3%), the patient's declaration of will (87.5%), and a clear legal act (81.3%). The majority of study participants supported the idea of limiting futile therapy, and this issue is well known among Polish physicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":12059,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae202","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The discontinuation of futile therapy is increasingly discussed in Polish clinical practice. Given the need to ensure patient well-being, it is essential to consider whether all clinical options resulting from medical progress should be used for every patient and on what grounds decisions to limit therapy should be based. The aim of our study was to determine the opinions of Polish medical doctors on this topic. We anonymously surveyed physicians across various specialties. An analysis of the collected data was carried out using descriptive and analytical methods. A total of 323 physicians participated in the study; 93% of them were aware of the problem of futile therapy in adults, with intensivists being significantly more aware (P = 0.002). Additionally, 95% of respondents supported the idea of discontinuing futile therapy, and over 68% used the therapy discontinuation protocol. Among the most common reasons for undertaking futile therapy, respondents cited fear of legal liability (93.5%), as well as fear of being accused of unethical behavior (62.2%) and fear before talking to the patient/patient's family and their reactions (57.9%). Respondents also identified factors that would facilitate making decisions about limiting futile therapy, including precise qualification criteria for limiting therapy and education in this area (95.3%), the patient's declaration of will (87.5%), and a clear legal act (81.3%). The majority of study participants supported the idea of limiting futile therapy, and this issue is well known among Polish physicians.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波兰医生对无效治疗的看法。
在波兰的临床实践中,越来越多地讨论了无效治疗的停止。考虑到需要确保病人的健康,必须考虑是否应该对每一个病人使用医学进展产生的所有临床选择,以及限制治疗的决定应该基于什么理由。我们研究的目的是确定波兰医生对这个话题的看法。我们匿名调查了不同专业的医生。使用描述性和分析性方法对收集的数据进行了分析。共有323名医生参与了这项研究;93%的受访医师意识到成人治疗无效的问题,其中强化医师的意识明显更高(P = 0.002)。此外,95%的受访者支持停止无效治疗的想法,超过68%的人使用了治疗停止方案。在接受无效治疗的最常见原因中,受访者表示害怕承担法律责任(93.5%),以及害怕被指控不道德行为(62.2%)和害怕与患者/患者家属交谈及其反应(57.9%)。受访者还确定了有助于做出限制无效治疗决定的因素,包括限制治疗的精确资格标准和该领域的教育(95.3%),患者的遗嘱声明(87.5%)和明确的法律行为(81.3%)。大多数研究参与者支持限制无效治疗的想法,这个问题在波兰医生中是众所周知的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Public Health
European Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
2039
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Public Health (EJPH) is a multidisciplinary journal aimed at attracting contributions from epidemiology, health services research, health economics, social sciences, management sciences, ethics and law, environmental health sciences, and other disciplines of relevance to public health. The journal provides a forum for discussion and debate of current international public health issues, with a focus on the European Region. Bi-monthly issues contain peer-reviewed original articles, editorials, commentaries, book reviews, news, letters to the editor, announcements of events, and various other features.
期刊最新文献
High prevalence of unrecognized chronic kidney disease in the Lolland-Falster Health Study: a population-based study in a rural provincial area of Denmark. The economic burden of smoking in Belgium: incremental healthcare costs and lost productivity. Effectiveness of the AZD1222 vaccine against COVID-19 hospitalization in Europe: final results from the COVIDRIVE test-negative case-control study. Stillbirth rate trends across 25 European countries between 2010 and 2021: the contribution of maternal age and multiplicity. Advancing personalized medicine: key priorities for clinical studies and funding systems based on a Europe-China collaborative Delphi survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1