Performance of Hemochron ACT-LR and ACT+ Test Cuvettes in Monitoring Low to Moderate Heparin Concentrations: An In Vitro Study

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1053/j.jvca.2024.12.001
Janne Moilanen MD , Marika Pada MD , Pasi Ohtonen MSc , Timo Kaakinen MD, PhD , Matti Pokela MD, PhD , Eeva-Riitta Savolainen MD, PhD , Tiina Erkinaro MD, PhD
{"title":"Performance of Hemochron ACT-LR and ACT+ Test Cuvettes in Monitoring Low to Moderate Heparin Concentrations: An In Vitro Study","authors":"Janne Moilanen MD ,&nbsp;Marika Pada MD ,&nbsp;Pasi Ohtonen MSc ,&nbsp;Timo Kaakinen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Matti Pokela MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Eeva-Riitta Savolainen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Tiina Erkinaro MD, PhD","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2024.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>According to the manufacturer, the Hemochron ACT-LR cuvette is designated for heparin concentrations of 0 to 2.5 IU/mL, while the optimal concentration range for the ACT+ cartridge is 1 to 6 IU/mL. We hypothesized that at low to moderate heparin concentrations, the ACT-LR is more reliable than the ACT+.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>An in vitro study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>A tertiary care university hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Twenty healthy adult volunteers.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Donor blood samples were spiked with unfractionated heparin to concentrations of 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 IU/mL. From each concentration, 3 measurements were made with each test cassette using 3 different Hemochron Signature Elite devices, for a total of 720 ACT tests. The Bland-Altman method and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to analyze the data.</div></div><div><h3>Measurements and Main Results</h3><div>All 360 ACT+ tests yielded a result. Of 360, 38 (11%) ACT-LR tests ran above the upper measurement range; of these, 36 were from the 120 measurements at heparin concentrations ≥2.0 IU/mL. The bias between all ACT-LR and ACT+ measurements ​​was 52 (95% CI, 48-56) celite seconds, and the limits of agreement were wide. Based on the intraclass correlation coefficients, the reliability of ACT+ was better than or equal to that of ACT-LR.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The performance of ACT+ is equal to that of ACT-LR up to a concentration of 0.5 IU/mL, above which ACT+ is superior to ACT-LR, questioning the rationale for a specific low-range test. However, there is a significant bias between ACT-LR and ACT+ measurements that needs to be considered if switching from one test to the other.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":"39 2","pages":"Pages 447-452"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105307702400939X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

According to the manufacturer, the Hemochron ACT-LR cuvette is designated for heparin concentrations of 0 to 2.5 IU/mL, while the optimal concentration range for the ACT+ cartridge is 1 to 6 IU/mL. We hypothesized that at low to moderate heparin concentrations, the ACT-LR is more reliable than the ACT+.

Design

An in vitro study.

Setting

A tertiary care university hospital.

Participants

Twenty healthy adult volunteers.

Interventions

Donor blood samples were spiked with unfractionated heparin to concentrations of 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 IU/mL. From each concentration, 3 measurements were made with each test cassette using 3 different Hemochron Signature Elite devices, for a total of 720 ACT tests. The Bland-Altman method and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to analyze the data.

Measurements and Main Results

All 360 ACT+ tests yielded a result. Of 360, 38 (11%) ACT-LR tests ran above the upper measurement range; of these, 36 were from the 120 measurements at heparin concentrations ≥2.0 IU/mL. The bias between all ACT-LR and ACT+ measurements ​​was 52 (95% CI, 48-56) celite seconds, and the limits of agreement were wide. Based on the intraclass correlation coefficients, the reliability of ACT+ was better than or equal to that of ACT-LR.

Conclusions

The performance of ACT+ is equal to that of ACT-LR up to a concentration of 0.5 IU/mL, above which ACT+ is superior to ACT-LR, questioning the rationale for a specific low-range test. However, there is a significant bias between ACT-LR and ACT+ measurements that needs to be considered if switching from one test to the other.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血色素ACT- lr和ACT+试验皿监测中低肝素浓度的性能:一项体外研究。
目的:据生产商介绍,haemchron ACT- lr比色管的肝素浓度范围为0 - 2.5 IU/mL,而ACT+试剂盒的最佳浓度范围为1 - 6 IU/mL。我们假设在低至中等肝素浓度下,ACT- lr比ACT+更可靠。设计:体外研究。环境:三级保健大学医院。参与者:20名健康成人志愿者。干预措施:供体血液样品加入未分离肝素,浓度分别为0、0.5、1.0、1.5、2.0和2.5 IU/mL。从每个浓度开始,每个测试盒使用3种不同的haemchron Signature Elite设备进行3次测量,总共进行720次ACT测试。采用Bland-Altman方法和类内相关系数对数据进行分析。测量和主要结果:所有360 ACT+测试都产生了结果。360例中,38例(11%)ACT-LR测试高于最高测量范围;其中,36例来自肝素浓度≥2.0 IU/mL的120例检测。所有ACT- lr和ACT+测量之间的偏差为52 (95% CI, 48-56) celite秒,一致性的限制范围很广。从类内相关系数来看,ACT+的信度优于或等于ACT- lr。结论:在0.5 IU/mL浓度下,ACT+与ACT- lr的性能相当,高于0.5 IU/mL时,ACT+优于ACT- lr,对进行特异性低量程检测的合理性提出质疑。然而,如果从一种测试切换到另一种测试,ACT- lr和ACT+测量之间需要考虑明显的偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
17.90%
发文量
606
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia is primarily aimed at anesthesiologists who deal with patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic or vascular surgical procedures. JCVA features a multidisciplinary approach, with contributions from cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, and other related specialists. Emphasis is placed on rapid publication of clinically relevant material.
期刊最新文献
To Be, or Not to Be: Is It Better to Be HFrEF or HFpEF or Somewhere In Between (HFmrEF)? Postoperative Liver Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation With Extracorporeal Life Support and 1-Year Mortality-A Cohort Study. Anesthetic and Surgical Management of Topsy-Turvy Heart: A Case Series Highlighting Cardiopulmonary and Airway Challenges. Advances in Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy. I. Cardiac Myosin Inhibitors. Comparative Analysis of Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheotomy and Surgical Tracheotomy in Critically Ill Patients: Outcomes and Complications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1