Evaluating post-cardiac arrest blood pressure thresholds associated with neurologic outcome in children: Insights from the pediRES-Q database.

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Resuscitation Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110468
A Ushpol, S Je, A Christoff, G Nuthall, B Scholefield, R W Morgan, V Nadkarni, S Gangadharan
{"title":"Evaluating post-cardiac arrest blood pressure thresholds associated with neurologic outcome in children: Insights from the pediRES-Q database.","authors":"A Ushpol, S Je, A Christoff, G Nuthall, B Scholefield, R W Morgan, V Nadkarni, S Gangadharan","doi":"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current Pediatric Advanced Life Support Guidelines recommend maintaining blood pressure (BP) above the 5th percentile for age following return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after cardiac arrest (CA). Emerging evidence suggests that targeting higher thresholds, such as the 10th or 25th percentiles, may improve neurologic outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the association between post-ROSC BP thresholds and neurologic outcome, hypothesizing that maintaining mean arterial pressure (MAP) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) above these thresholds would be associated with improved outcomes at hospital discharge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, multi-center, observational study analyzed data from the Pediatric Resuscitation Quality Collaborative (pediRES-Q). Children (<18 years) who achieved ROSC following index in-hospital or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and survived ≥ 6 h were included. Multivariable logistic regression was preformed to analyze the association between the pre-defined BP thresholds (5th, 10th, and 25th percentiles) and favorable neurologic outcome, controlling for illness category (surgical-cardiac), initial rhythm (shockable), arrest time (weekend or night), age, CPR duration, and clustering by site.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 787 patients with evaluable MAP data and 711 patients with evaluable SBP data. Fifty-four percent (N = 424) of subjects with MAP data and 53 % (N = 380) with SBP data survived to hospital discharge with favorable neurologic outcome. MAP above the 5th, 10th, and 25th percentile thresholds was associated with significantly greater odds of favorable outcome compared to patients with MAP below target (aOR, 1.81 [95 % CI, 1.32, 2.50]; 1.50 [95 % CI, 1.10, 2.05]; 1.40 [95 % CI, 1.01, 1.94], respectively). Subjects with lowest SBP above the 5th percentile also had greater odds of favorable outcome (aOR, 1.44 [95 % CI, 1.04, 2.01]). Associations between lowest SBP above the 10th percentile and 25th percentile did not reach statistical significance (aOR 1.33 [95 % CI, 0.96, 1.86]; 1.23 [95 % CI, 0.87, 1.75], respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After pediatric CA, maintaining MAP above the 5th, 10th, and 25th percentiles and SBP above the 5th percentile during the first 6 h following ROSC was significantly associated with improved neurologic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":21052,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation","volume":" ","pages":"110468"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110468","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current Pediatric Advanced Life Support Guidelines recommend maintaining blood pressure (BP) above the 5th percentile for age following return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after cardiac arrest (CA). Emerging evidence suggests that targeting higher thresholds, such as the 10th or 25th percentiles, may improve neurologic outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the association between post-ROSC BP thresholds and neurologic outcome, hypothesizing that maintaining mean arterial pressure (MAP) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) above these thresholds would be associated with improved outcomes at hospital discharge.

Methods: This retrospective, multi-center, observational study analyzed data from the Pediatric Resuscitation Quality Collaborative (pediRES-Q). Children (<18 years) who achieved ROSC following index in-hospital or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and survived ≥ 6 h were included. Multivariable logistic regression was preformed to analyze the association between the pre-defined BP thresholds (5th, 10th, and 25th percentiles) and favorable neurologic outcome, controlling for illness category (surgical-cardiac), initial rhythm (shockable), arrest time (weekend or night), age, CPR duration, and clustering by site.

Results: There were 787 patients with evaluable MAP data and 711 patients with evaluable SBP data. Fifty-four percent (N = 424) of subjects with MAP data and 53 % (N = 380) with SBP data survived to hospital discharge with favorable neurologic outcome. MAP above the 5th, 10th, and 25th percentile thresholds was associated with significantly greater odds of favorable outcome compared to patients with MAP below target (aOR, 1.81 [95 % CI, 1.32, 2.50]; 1.50 [95 % CI, 1.10, 2.05]; 1.40 [95 % CI, 1.01, 1.94], respectively). Subjects with lowest SBP above the 5th percentile also had greater odds of favorable outcome (aOR, 1.44 [95 % CI, 1.04, 2.01]). Associations between lowest SBP above the 10th percentile and 25th percentile did not reach statistical significance (aOR 1.33 [95 % CI, 0.96, 1.86]; 1.23 [95 % CI, 0.87, 1.75], respectively).

Conclusion: After pediatric CA, maintaining MAP above the 5th, 10th, and 25th percentiles and SBP above the 5th percentile during the first 6 h following ROSC was significantly associated with improved neurologic outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估心脏骤停后血压阈值与儿童神经系统预后相关:来自pediRES-Q数据库的见解
背景:目前的儿科高级生命支持指南建议在心脏骤停(CA)后自动循环(ROSC)恢复后维持血压(BP)高于年龄的第5百分位数。新出现的证据表明,瞄准更高的阈值,如第10或第25百分位,可能会改善神经系统的预后。我们的目的是评估rosc后血压阈值与神经系统预后之间的关系,假设维持平均动脉压(MAP)和收缩压(SBP)高于这些阈值将与出院时改善的预后相关。方法:这项回顾性、多中心、观察性研究分析了来自儿科复苏质量协作(pediRES-Q)的数据。结果:787例患者MAP数据可评估,711例患者收缩压数据可评估。54% (N = 424)有MAP数据的受试者和53% (N = 380)有收缩压数据的受试者存活至出院,神经系统预后良好。与MAP低于目标值的患者相比,MAP高于第5、第10和第25百分位阈值的患者获得良好结果的几率显著增加(aOR, 1.81[95 % CI, 1.32, 2.50];1.50[95 % ci, 1.10, 2.05];1.40[95 % CI, 1.01, 1.94])。收缩压最低高于第5百分位的受试者也有更大的有利结果的几率(aOR, 1.44[95 % CI, 1.04, 2.01])。最低收缩压高于第10百分位和第25百分位的相关性无统计学意义(aOR 1.33[95 % CI, 0.96, 1.86];1.23[95 % CI, 0.87, 1.75])。结论:小儿CA后,在ROSC后的前6 h内保持MAP高于第5、第10和第25百分位,收缩压高于第5百分位,与神经系统预后的改善显著相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation
Resuscitation 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
18.50%
发文量
556
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Resuscitation is a monthly international and interdisciplinary medical journal. The papers published deal with the aetiology, pathophysiology and prevention of cardiac arrest, resuscitation training, clinical resuscitation, and experimental resuscitation research, although papers relating to animal studies will be published only if they are of exceptional interest and related directly to clinical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Papers relating to trauma are published occasionally but the majority of these concern traumatic cardiac arrest.
期刊最新文献
Implications of an Individualized Resuscitation Strategy Using Continuous Rhythm and Physiologic Status Assessment During Ongoing CPR. Unraveling some of the myth about drowning, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and outcomes: Many critical factors and processes, most of them disappointingly difficult to manage. Who put the "E" in CPR: Equity before Extracorporeal? Using cardiac arrest registries for clinical trials by adding wagons to a rolling train. A retrospective 'target trial emulation' comparing amiodarone and lidocaine for adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1