Resuscitation最新文献

Objective: The administration of amiodarone or lidocaine is recommended during the resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients presenting with defibrillation-refractory or recurrent ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia. Our objective was to use 'target trial emulation' methodology to compare the outcomes of patients who received amiodarone or lidocaine during resuscitation.

Methods: Adult, non-traumatic OHCA patients in the ESO Data Collaborative 2018-2023 datasets who experienced OHCA prior to EMS arrival, presented with a shockable rhythm, and received amiodarone or lidocaine during resuscitation were evaluated for inclusion. We used propensity score matching (PSM) to investigate the association between antiarrhythmic and outcomes. Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the number of post-drug defibrillations and survival to hospital discharge.

Results: After application of exclusion criteria, 23,263 patients from 1,707 EMS agencies were eligible for analysis. Prior to PSM, 6,010/20,284 (29.6%) of the patients who received amiodarone and 1,071/2,979 (35.9%) of the patients who received lidocaine achieved prehospital ROSC. Following PSM, lidocaine administration was associated with greater odds of prehospital ROSC (36.0 vs. 30.4%; aOR: 1.29 [1.16, 1.44], n=2,976 matched pairs). Lidocaine administration was also associated with fewer post-drug defibrillations (median: 2 [0-4] vs. 2 [0-6], mean: 3.3 vs. 3.9, p<0.01, n=2,976 pairs), and greater odds of survival to discharge (35.1 vs. 25.7%; OR: 1.54 [1.19, 2.00], n=538 pairs).

Conclusion: Our 'target trial emulation' suggested that lidocaine was associated with greater odds of prehospital ROSC in comparison to amiodarone when administered during resuscitation from shock refractory or recurrent VF/VT.

Introduction: Effective defibrillation is essential to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival. International guidelines recommend initial defibrillation energies between 120 and 360 Joules, which has led to widespread practice variation. Leveraging this natural experiment, we aimed to explore the association between initial defibrillation dose and outcome following OHCA.

Methods: The ESO Data Collaborative (2018-2022) was used for this nationwide, retrospective study of adult (18-80 years of age) non-traumatic OHCA patients who presented with an initially shockable ECG rhythm. We excluded patients if they had ROSC prior to initial defibrillation, a resuscitation-limiting advanced directive, or were residents in a healthcare institution. The primary exposure was initial defibrillation dose, defined as Joules per kilogram of body weight, and the primary outcome was return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). We included survival to discharge as a secondary outcome. We used multivariable logistic regression modeling to assess the relationship between defibrillation dose and outcome.

Results: We analyzed data from 21,121 patients. Of the 12,160 patients linked to a defibrillator manufacturer, 7,240 (59.5%) were treated using a biphasic truncated exponential (BTE) waveform and 4,920 (40.5%) were treated using a rectilinear biphasic (RLB) waveform. Defibrillation dose (per 1 J/kg increase) was not associated with ROSC (BTE aOR: 0.97 [0.92, 1.01], n=7,240; RLB aOR: 1.00 [0.92, 1.09], n=4,920; all aOR: 1.01 [0.98, 1.04], 21,121) or survival (BTE aOR: 0.98 [0.87, 1.10], n=1,245; RLB aOR: 0.89 [0.70, 1.12], n=775; all aOR: 1.00 [0.92, 1.08], n=2,981).

Conclusions: Initial defibrillation dose was not associated with outcome in this nationwide cohort.

Background: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is increasingly used for adults with cardiac arrest (CA) refractory to Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS). Concerns exist that adding ECPR could worsen health inequities, defined as differences in health outcomes that are unfair or unjust. Current guidelines do not explicitly address this issue. This study narratively reviews the latest evidence on ECPR, focusing on its implications for health equity and derives a health equity tool that may serve as a basis of comparison for resuscitation sciences.

Methods: We searched the American Heart Association (AHA) and International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) websites for the latest ACLS guidelines and scientific summaries on ECPR for CA and identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. We identified population and individual characteristics associated with inequities based on the literature and expert opinion. These characteristics were used as a health equity tool to assess: differences in baseline risk, population exclusion and trial representation in studies, outcome analyses, and implementation barriers. We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework to evaluate ECPR's impact on health equity.

Results: Four RCTs involving 435 patients were conducted in the (2/4) USA, (1/4) Czech Republic, and (1/4) Netherlands. We identified thirteen characteristics associated with health inequities. All trials took place in urban, high-resourced hospitals and excluded older adults (60-75+ years). Across all RCTs, women were under-represented, and in the two USA-based trials, Black individuals were under-represented. There was no difference in baseline rate of survival with minimal or no neurologic impairment between sexes, but an observed trend favoring younger patients (<65). One trial's subgroup analysis showed no significant differences in ECPR effectiveness by sex or age. We noted that implementing ECPR for out-of-hospital CA faces challenges due to demographic variability, differences in emergency services, access to existing ECPR programs, and limited implementation outside urban areas.

Conclusions: A health equity tool based on axes of health inequities for resuscitation identified that health equity is reduced with the use of ECPR for CA. Mitigation strategies should involve evaluating demographics, health equity measures, outcomes and ensuring equitable access to ECPR across catchment areas before and after implementation.

Background: Hanging is a common cause of suicide and asphyxial cardiac arrest. There are few data to inform the treatment of cardiac arrest after hanging. We designed a scoping review to describe evidence relating to interventions and outcomes in patients with and without cardiac arrest after hanging.

Methods: Medline, Embase and Cochrane were searched from inception to 05/12/2024. Titles and abstracts were screened, and duplicates were removed. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they studied non-judicial hanging in adults or children, included cardiac arrest patients and provided functional or survival outcomes.

Results: The search retrieved 855 articles. One hundred and nineteen references underwent full-text review. Forty-five studies were included in the review. Studies were mainly from high-income countries and were all observational. There was variation in the terminology for hanging and in the outcomes reported. Survival with favourable functional outcome was rare in patients with cardiac arrest after hanging but was very common in patients without cardiac arrest. Cervical spine, airway and vascular injuries were rare. No studies identified interventions that were associated with improved survival following return of spontaneous circulation.

Conclusion: There are few data to inform treatment of patients with cardiac arrest after hanging. The available data suggest that cardiac arrest is a critical determinant of poor outcome following hanging. Further research should uniformly report outcomes of patients with cardiac arrest after hanging based on the Utstein template.

Manual and mechanical ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation are critical yet poorly understood components of resuscitation care. In recent years, intra-arrest ventilation has been the subject of a growing number of laboratory and clinical investigations. Essential components to accurately interpret or reproduce original investigations are the exact measurement and transparent reporting of key ventilation parameters, such as volumes and airway pressures obtained during ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Chest compressions lead to frequent intrathoracic and intrapulmonary pressure rises which interact with artificial ventilation. The resulting unique phenomena during continuous chest compressions with asynchronous ventilation and an advanced airway, necessitate a nuanced conceptualization supported by a common terminology. Based on previous original investigations and observations, we describe intra-arrest ventilation parameters and propose a common terminology integrating established and novel concepts. The proposed terminology may serve as a methodological and reporting consideration for future research of intra-arrest ventilation. Additionally, it may serve as a foundation for an authoritative scientific consensus process, which may further facilitate the transparent reporting and reproducible science needed to understand cardiopulmonary resuscitation and improve survival for cardiac arrest patients.

Aims: To determine which patient and cardiac arrest factors were associated with obtaining neuroimaging after in-hospital cardiac arrest, and among those patients who had neuroimaging, factors associated with which neuroimaging modality was obtained.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients who survived in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) and were enrolled in the ICU-RESUS trial (NCT02837497).

Results: We tabulated ultrasound (US), CT, and MRI frequency within 7 days following IHCA and identified patient and cardiac arrest factors associated with neuroimaging modalities utilized. Multivariable models determined which factors were associated with obtaining neuroimaging. Of 1000 patients, 44% had ≥1 neuroimaging study (US in 31%, CT in 18%, and MRI in 6% of patients). Initial USs were performed a median of 0.3 [0.1,0.5], CTs 1.4 [0.4,2.8], and MRIs 4.1 [2.2,5.1] days post-arrest. Neuroimaging timing and frequency varied by site. Factors associated with greater odds of neuroimaging were cardiac arrest in CICU (versus PICU), longer duration CPR, receiving ECMO post-arrest, and post-arrest care with targeted temperature management or EEG monitoring. US performance was associated with congenital heart disease. CT was associated with age ≥1-month, greater pre-arrest disability, and receiving CPR for ≥16 minutes. MRI utilization increased with pre-existing respiratory insufficiency and respiratory decompensation as arrest cause, and medical cardiac and surgical non-cardiac or trauma illness category. Overall, if neuroimaging was obtained, US was more common in CICU while CT/MRI were utilized more in PICU.

Conclusions: Practice patterns for acquiring neuroimaging after IHCA are variable and influenced by patient, cardiac arrest, and site factors.