Reliability of post-contrast deep learning-based highly accelerated cardiac cine MRI for the assessment of ventricular function.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Magnetic resonance imaging Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1016/j.mri.2024.110313
Makoto Orii, Momoko Sugawara, Tsuyoshi Sugawara, Kunihiro Yoshioka
{"title":"Reliability of post-contrast deep learning-based highly accelerated cardiac cine MRI for the assessment of ventricular function.","authors":"Makoto Orii, Momoko Sugawara, Tsuyoshi Sugawara, Kunihiro Yoshioka","doi":"10.1016/j.mri.2024.110313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The total examination time can be reduced if high-quality two-dimensional (2D) cine images can be collected post-contrast to minimize non-scanning time prior to late gadolinium-enhanced imaging. This study aimed to assess the equivalency of the pre-and post-contrast performance of 2D deep learning-based highly accelerated cardiac cine (DL cine) imaging by evaluating the image quality and the quantification of biventricular volumes and function in the clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Thirty patients (20 men, mean age 53.7 ± 17.8 years) underwent cardiac magnetic resonance on a 1.5 T scanner for clinical indications, and pre- and post-contrast DL cine images were acquired with a short-axis view. Image-quality was scored according to three main criteria: the blood-to-myocardial contrast, endocardial edge delineation, and presence of motion artifacts throughout the cardiac cycle. Biventricular end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), stroke volume (SV), ejection fraction (EF), and left ventricular mass (LVM) were analyzed and compared between the pre- and post-contrast DL cine images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The actual median time of 2D DL cine acquisition was 38.4 ± 9.1 s. There were no significant differences in the image quality scores between pre- and post-contrast DL cine images (p > 0.05). In the volume and functional analysis, there was no significant difference in terms of biventricular EDV, ESV, SV, EF, and LVM (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The performance of 2D DL cine is equivalent before and after contrast injection for the assessment of image quality and ventricular function in the clinical setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":18165,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic resonance imaging","volume":" ","pages":"110313"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic resonance imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2024.110313","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The total examination time can be reduced if high-quality two-dimensional (2D) cine images can be collected post-contrast to minimize non-scanning time prior to late gadolinium-enhanced imaging. This study aimed to assess the equivalency of the pre-and post-contrast performance of 2D deep learning-based highly accelerated cardiac cine (DL cine) imaging by evaluating the image quality and the quantification of biventricular volumes and function in the clinical setting.

Material and methods: Thirty patients (20 men, mean age 53.7 ± 17.8 years) underwent cardiac magnetic resonance on a 1.5 T scanner for clinical indications, and pre- and post-contrast DL cine images were acquired with a short-axis view. Image-quality was scored according to three main criteria: the blood-to-myocardial contrast, endocardial edge delineation, and presence of motion artifacts throughout the cardiac cycle. Biventricular end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), stroke volume (SV), ejection fraction (EF), and left ventricular mass (LVM) were analyzed and compared between the pre- and post-contrast DL cine images.

Results: The actual median time of 2D DL cine acquisition was 38.4 ± 9.1 s. There were no significant differences in the image quality scores between pre- and post-contrast DL cine images (p > 0.05). In the volume and functional analysis, there was no significant difference in terms of biventricular EDV, ESV, SV, EF, and LVM (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: The performance of 2D DL cine is equivalent before and after contrast injection for the assessment of image quality and ventricular function in the clinical setting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetic resonance imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the first international multidisciplinary journal encompassing physical, life, and clinical science investigations as they relate to the development and use of magnetic resonance imaging. MRI is dedicated to both basic research, technological innovation and applications, providing a single forum for communication among radiologists, physicists, chemists, biochemists, biologists, engineers, internists, pathologists, physiologists, computer scientists, and mathematicians.
期刊最新文献
Preclinical validation of a metasurface-inspired conformal elliptical-cylinder resonator for wrist MRI at 1.5 T. P53 status combined with MRI findings for prognosis prediction of single hepatocellular carcinoma. Predicting progression in triple-negative breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Insights from peritumoral radiomics. Deep learning radiomics nomograms predict Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) genotypes in brain glioma: A multicenter study. Reliability of post-contrast deep learning-based highly accelerated cardiac cine MRI for the assessment of ventricular function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1