Positive Margin Rates in Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Malignancies: A National Analysis.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-22 DOI:10.1002/ohn.1087
Rahul K Sharma, Ryan K Orosco, Ramez Philips, Farhoud Faraji, Antoinette R Esce, Michael C Topf
{"title":"Positive Margin Rates in Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Malignancies: A National Analysis.","authors":"Rahul K Sharma, Ryan K Orosco, Ramez Philips, Farhoud Faraji, Antoinette R Esce, Michael C Topf","doi":"10.1002/ohn.1087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Oral cavity malignancies (OCC) and oropharyngeal malignancies (OPC) historically have higher rates of positive surgical margins (PSM) compared to other solid malignancies. The objective of this study is to understand trends and predictors in positive surgical margins (PSM) for OPSCC and OCSCC using the National Cancer Database (NCDB).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective Cohort Study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>National Cancer Database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of patients with OCC and OPC between 2004 and 2020 in the NCDB. Linear regression analysis between PSM rates and year was performed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate the effect of the year of diagnosis on PSM after adjusting for patient, tumor, and healthcare system-related factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 60,695 patients with OCC and 31,950 patients with OPC. Overall PSM rate was 16.1% in OCC and 33.1% in OPC. OCC PSM rate decreased from 17.7% in 2004 to 15.8% in 2020. OPC PSM rate decreased from 32.5% to 25.0%. Later date of diagnosis was associated with a reduction in positive margins for both OCC (odds ratio [OR] 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99-1.0, P < .001) and OPC (0.99, 0.98-0.99, P < .001). For patients with available minimally-invasive surgery data, both later year of diagnosis (0.95, 0.93-0.96, P < .001) and use of minimally-invasive techniques (0.830, 0.75-0.92, P < .001) were associated with a reduction in PSM in OPC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Positive margins for OCC/OPC have been decreasing over the past 2 decades. Robot use has been associated with a reduced PSM rate in OPC. Understanding factors that may contribute to trends in PSM is important in promoting continued improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":19707,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1087","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Oral cavity malignancies (OCC) and oropharyngeal malignancies (OPC) historically have higher rates of positive surgical margins (PSM) compared to other solid malignancies. The objective of this study is to understand trends and predictors in positive surgical margins (PSM) for OPSCC and OCSCC using the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

Study design: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Setting: National Cancer Database.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients with OCC and OPC between 2004 and 2020 in the NCDB. Linear regression analysis between PSM rates and year was performed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate the effect of the year of diagnosis on PSM after adjusting for patient, tumor, and healthcare system-related factors.

Results: We analyzed 60,695 patients with OCC and 31,950 patients with OPC. Overall PSM rate was 16.1% in OCC and 33.1% in OPC. OCC PSM rate decreased from 17.7% in 2004 to 15.8% in 2020. OPC PSM rate decreased from 32.5% to 25.0%. Later date of diagnosis was associated with a reduction in positive margins for both OCC (odds ratio [OR] 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99-1.0, P < .001) and OPC (0.99, 0.98-0.99, P < .001). For patients with available minimally-invasive surgery data, both later year of diagnosis (0.95, 0.93-0.96, P < .001) and use of minimally-invasive techniques (0.830, 0.75-0.92, P < .001) were associated with a reduction in PSM in OPC.

Conclusion: Positive margins for OCC/OPC have been decreasing over the past 2 decades. Robot use has been associated with a reduced PSM rate in OPC. Understanding factors that may contribute to trends in PSM is important in promoting continued improvement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
250
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. The mission of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant information in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery (ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders) that can be used by otolaryngologists, clinicians, scientists, and specialists to improve patient care and public health.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of IL-1 Receptor Antagonist and Dexamethasone in Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: Animal Model. Positive Margin Rates in Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Malignancies: A National Analysis. Radiological Sublingual Space Invasion in Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Clinicopathological Associations and Impact on Survival. Time-Drive Activity-Based Costing (TDABC) in Otolaryngology: A Scoping Review. Using Postactivation Adjustment as a Marker for Inferior Outcomes in Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulator Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1