The Worries About Recurrence or Progression Scale in Cancer (WARPS-C): A Valid and Reliable Measure to Screen for Fear of Cancer Recurrence.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Psycho‐Oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1002/pon.70055
Maddison Smith, Louise Sharpe, Natalie Winiarski, Joanne Shaw
{"title":"The Worries About Recurrence or Progression Scale in Cancer (WARPS-C): A Valid and Reliable Measure to Screen for Fear of Cancer Recurrence.","authors":"Maddison Smith, Louise Sharpe, Natalie Winiarski, Joanne Shaw","doi":"10.1002/pon.70055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Worries About Recurrence or Progression Scale (WARPS) was recently validated in four common chronic illnesses other than cancer, after a rigorous development process based on the COSMIN criteria. Available measures of fear of progression or fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) have been criticised for not meeting all COSMIN criteria. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the psychometric properties of the WARPS in a cancer sample to assess its applicability to measure FCR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 346 participants living with or beyond cancer for an online survey. The psychometric properties of the WARPS were examined using a confirmatory factor analysis. Convergent validity was assessed against the current gold standard questionnaires and constructs related to FCR. Some participants completed a follow-up survey 2 weeks later, to assess the test-retest reliability. Finally, a Receiver Operating Characteristics analysis was conducted to determine clinical cut-offs for the WARPS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed that the WARPS has one underlying factor, fear of recurrence or progression (FRP), with adequate model fit. The WARPS demonstrated excellent internal consistency, test-retest reliability and showed convergent validity. ROC analysis revealed a cut-off of 54 for moderate, and 65 for severe FCR on the WARPS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The WARPS demonstrated good psychometric properties in a cancer sample. It has the capacity to be used as a screening tool to identify clinical levels of FCR. The WARPS was developed consistent with the COSMIN criteria and overcomes some of the limitations of existing measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"33 12","pages":"e70055"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho‐Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70055","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The Worries About Recurrence or Progression Scale (WARPS) was recently validated in four common chronic illnesses other than cancer, after a rigorous development process based on the COSMIN criteria. Available measures of fear of progression or fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) have been criticised for not meeting all COSMIN criteria. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the psychometric properties of the WARPS in a cancer sample to assess its applicability to measure FCR.

Methods: We recruited 346 participants living with or beyond cancer for an online survey. The psychometric properties of the WARPS were examined using a confirmatory factor analysis. Convergent validity was assessed against the current gold standard questionnaires and constructs related to FCR. Some participants completed a follow-up survey 2 weeks later, to assess the test-retest reliability. Finally, a Receiver Operating Characteristics analysis was conducted to determine clinical cut-offs for the WARPS.

Results: Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed that the WARPS has one underlying factor, fear of recurrence or progression (FRP), with adequate model fit. The WARPS demonstrated excellent internal consistency, test-retest reliability and showed convergent validity. ROC analysis revealed a cut-off of 54 for moderate, and 65 for severe FCR on the WARPS.

Conclusions: The WARPS demonstrated good psychometric properties in a cancer sample. It has the capacity to be used as a screening tool to identify clinical levels of FCR. The WARPS was developed consistent with the COSMIN criteria and overcomes some of the limitations of existing measures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症复发或进展担忧量表(WARPS-C):一种有效可靠的筛查癌症复发恐惧的方法。
目的:根据COSMIN标准,经过严格的开发过程,对复发或进展的担忧量表(WARPS)最近在癌症以外的四种常见慢性疾病中得到了验证。现有的癌症进展恐惧或癌症复发恐惧(FCR)的测量方法因不符合COSMIN的所有标准而受到批评。因此,本研究旨在探讨WARPS在癌症样本中的心理测量特性,以评估其在测量FCR方面的适用性。方法:我们招募了346名癌症患者进行在线调查。WARPS的心理测量特性采用验证性因子分析进行检验。对当前金标准问卷和与FCR相关的构念进行收敛效度评估。一些参与者在2周后完成了随访调查,以评估测试-重测的信度。最后,进行受试者操作特征分析以确定WARPS的临床截止值。结果:验证性因素分析证实WARPS有一个潜在因素,即害怕复发或进展(FRP),具有足够的模型拟合。WARPS具有良好的内部一致性、重测信度和收敛效度。ROC分析显示,在WARPS上,中度FCR的截止值为54,重度FCR的截止值为65。结论:WARPS在癌症样本中表现出良好的心理测量特性。它有能力作为一种筛选工具,以确定临床水平的FCR。WARPS的开发与COSMIN标准一致,克服了现有措施的一些局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psycho‐Oncology
Psycho‐Oncology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
220
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psycho-Oncology is concerned with the psychological, social, behavioral, and ethical aspects of cancer. This subspeciality addresses the two major psychological dimensions of cancer: the psychological responses of patients to cancer at all stages of the disease, and that of their families and caretakers; and the psychological, behavioral and social factors that may influence the disease process. Psycho-oncology is an area of multi-disciplinary interest and has boundaries with the major specialities in oncology: the clinical disciplines (surgery, medicine, pediatrics, radiotherapy), epidemiology, immunology, endocrinology, biology, pathology, bioethics, palliative care, rehabilitation medicine, clinical trials research and decision making, as well as psychiatry and psychology. This international journal is published twelve times a year and will consider contributions to research of clinical and theoretical interest. Topics covered are wide-ranging and relate to the psychosocial aspects of cancer and AIDS-related tumors, including: epidemiology, quality of life, palliative and supportive care, psychiatry, psychology, sociology, social work, nursing and educational issues. Special reviews are offered from time to time. There is a section reviewing recently published books. A society news section is available for the dissemination of information relating to meetings, conferences and other society-related topics. Summary proceedings of important national and international symposia falling within the aims of the journal are presented.
期刊最新文献
Post-Treatment Cancer Survivors' Experience of Social Reintegration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis. Psychosocial Correlates of Death Anxiety in Advanced Cancer: A Scoping Review. Connections After Cancer: Adolescent and Young Adult Survivors' Perspectives on Forming New Friendships After Cancer. Systematic Review of Pain Assessment Measures Used in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. A Systematic Review of Cancer-Related Trauma and Growth in Caregivers Across the Lifespan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1