Goal-oriented preoperative biliary drainage is more precise and conducive to seize the opportunity for pancreaticoduodenectomy.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY World Journal of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1186/s12957-024-03615-y
Hongtao Cao, Tianyu Li, Zeru Li, Bangbo Zhao, Ziwen Liu, Weibin Wang
{"title":"Goal-oriented preoperative biliary drainage is more precise and conducive to seize the opportunity for pancreaticoduodenectomy.","authors":"Hongtao Cao, Tianyu Li, Zeru Li, Bangbo Zhao, Ziwen Liu, Weibin Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12957-024-03615-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) for selected patients with severe juandice has been shown to improve clinical conditions for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and reduce the risk of post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH). However, the determination of an optimal end-point for PBD remains unclear. The aim of this research is to introduce the concept of goal-oriented biliary drainage, which may serve as a reasonable target and identify the optimal surgery time window.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical data of 194 patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer and obstructive jaundice were retrospectively analyzed. Serological laboratory examinations including total bilirubin (TBIL) within one week before PBD and PD were recorded and labeled as TBIL-pre and TBIL-post respectively. PBD and PD were performed by experienced medical teams. PPH with grade B and C were enrolled.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TBIL-post less than 93.0µmol/L (sensitivity 83.78%, specificity 72.61%) or TBIL decay more than 68.5% (sensitivity 86.49%, specificity 69.43%) identified through ROC curves and multivariate analysis were independent protective factors for reducing the risk of PPH (OR 0.234 and 0.191 retrospectively, P<0.05) and were established as PBD goals. The Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated the median time to achieve both PBD goals was 3 weeks. Additionally, the proportion of patients achieving both goals failed to increase with the PBD duration over 6 weeks (P > 0.05). The proportion of TBIL-post ≤ 93.0µmol/L (70.8% vs. 51.1%, P<0.05) and TBIL decay ≥ 68.5% (67.0% vs. 50.0%, P<0.05) were higher in EBS group than those in PTCD group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A goal-oriented PBD with the target of TBIL ≤ 93.0µmol/L or TBIL decay ≥ 68.5% can reduce the morbidity of PPH. In general conditions, PBD duration within 3 weeks would be sufficient, while exceeding the duration beyond 6 weeks could not provide additional benefits. Both EBS and PTCD are safe and EBS is more recommended due to its superior performance in achieving the goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":23856,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":"22 1","pages":"331"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11660979/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-024-03615-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) for selected patients with severe juandice has been shown to improve clinical conditions for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and reduce the risk of post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH). However, the determination of an optimal end-point for PBD remains unclear. The aim of this research is to introduce the concept of goal-oriented biliary drainage, which may serve as a reasonable target and identify the optimal surgery time window.

Methods: The clinical data of 194 patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer and obstructive jaundice were retrospectively analyzed. Serological laboratory examinations including total bilirubin (TBIL) within one week before PBD and PD were recorded and labeled as TBIL-pre and TBIL-post respectively. PBD and PD were performed by experienced medical teams. PPH with grade B and C were enrolled.

Results: TBIL-post less than 93.0µmol/L (sensitivity 83.78%, specificity 72.61%) or TBIL decay more than 68.5% (sensitivity 86.49%, specificity 69.43%) identified through ROC curves and multivariate analysis were independent protective factors for reducing the risk of PPH (OR 0.234 and 0.191 retrospectively, P<0.05) and were established as PBD goals. The Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated the median time to achieve both PBD goals was 3 weeks. Additionally, the proportion of patients achieving both goals failed to increase with the PBD duration over 6 weeks (P > 0.05). The proportion of TBIL-post ≤ 93.0µmol/L (70.8% vs. 51.1%, P<0.05) and TBIL decay ≥ 68.5% (67.0% vs. 50.0%, P<0.05) were higher in EBS group than those in PTCD group.

Conclusion: A goal-oriented PBD with the target of TBIL ≤ 93.0µmol/L or TBIL decay ≥ 68.5% can reduce the morbidity of PPH. In general conditions, PBD duration within 3 weeks would be sufficient, while exceeding the duration beyond 6 weeks could not provide additional benefits. Both EBS and PTCD are safe and EBS is more recommended due to its superior performance in achieving the goals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目标导向的术前胆道引流更加精准,有利于把握胰十二指肠切除术时机。
研究背景:术前胆道引流(PBD)可改善胰十二指肠切除术(PD)患者的临床状况,降低胰十二指肠切除术后出血(PPH)的风险。然而,PBD的最佳终点的确定仍不清楚。本研究的目的是引入目标导向胆道引流的概念,作为一个合理的目标,确定最佳的手术时间窗。方法:回顾性分析194例胰腺癌合并梗阻性黄疸患者的临床资料。记录PBD和PD前一周的血清学实验室检查,包括总胆红素(TBIL),分别标记为TBIL前和TBIL后。PBD和PD由经验丰富的医疗团队进行。纳入B级和C级PPH。结果:通过ROC曲线和多因素分析确定TBIL-post < 93.0µmol/L(敏感性83.78%,特异性72.61%)或TBIL衰减> 68.5%(敏感性86.49%,特异性69.43%)是降低PPH风险的独立保护因素(回顾性分析or分别为0.234和0.191,P 0.05)。TBIL-post≤93.0µmol/L的比例(70.8% vs. 51.1%)结论:目标导向的PBD,目标TBIL≤93.0µmol/L或TBIL衰减≥68.5%可降低PPH的发病率。一般情况下,PBD持续时间在3周内就足够了,超过6周就不能提供额外的益处。EBS和PTCD都是安全的,由于EBS在实现目标方面的性能优越,因此更推荐使用EBS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.60%
发文量
362
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgical Oncology publishes articles related to surgical oncology and its allied subjects, such as epidemiology, cancer research, biomarkers, prevention, pathology, radiology, cancer treatment, clinical trials, multimodality treatment and molecular biology. Emphasis is placed on original research articles. The journal also publishes significant clinical case reports, as well as balanced and timely reviews on selected topics. Oncology is a multidisciplinary super-speciality of which surgical oncology forms an integral component, especially with solid tumors. Surgical oncologists around the world are involved in research extending from detecting the mechanisms underlying the causation of cancer, to its treatment and prevention. The role of a surgical oncologist extends across the whole continuum of care. With continued developments in diagnosis and treatment, the role of a surgical oncologist is ever-changing. Hence, World Journal of Surgical Oncology aims to keep readers abreast with latest developments that will ultimately influence the work of surgical oncologists.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer patients: a retrospective, comparative study. Establishing a preoperative predictive model for gallbladder adenoma and cholesterol polyps based on machine learning: a multicentre retrospective study. Division of the inferior pulmonary ligament during upper lobectomy does not improve postoperative pulmonary function: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials. Risk factors for lymphatic leakage following radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Efficacy comparison of optimal natural orifice specimen extraction for robotic middle rectal cancer resection in women: transanal or transvaginal orifice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1