Evaluation of Optic Disc Drusen Using Modern Imaging Paraclinical Methods.

Q4 Medicine Ceska a Slovenska Oftalmologie Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.31348/2024/39
Michal Březík, Adam Kopecký, Oldřich Chrapek, Juraj Timkovič, Jan Němčanský
{"title":"Evaluation of Optic Disc Drusen Using Modern Imaging Paraclinical Methods.","authors":"Michal Březík, Adam Kopecký, Oldřich Chrapek, Juraj Timkovič, Jan Němčanský","doi":"10.31348/2024/39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong> To analyze patients with optic disc drusen (ODD), with emphasis on modern diagnostics.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong> Research of the literature was conducted, together with a retrospective statistical analysis of patients with ODD. The group included individuals with ODD diagnosed using at least one of the following (ultrasound - USG, optical coherence tomography - OCT, fundus autofluorescence - FAF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The group consisted of 12 patients (23 eyes), 7 women and 5 men. The mean age was 25 years. The mean observation period was 73 months. In total, 11 patients (22 eyes) had a bilateral finding and 1 patient (1 eye) had a unilateral finding. The mean age was 25 years. Buried drusen were confirmed in 69.6% of cases (8 patients, 16 eyes), superficial drusen were confirmed in 30.4% of cases (4 patients, 7 eyes). Mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and mean intraocular pressure were stable over time (BCVA p = 0.236, IOP p = 0.855). The aforementioned diagnostic methods proved to be equally effective (p = 0.768). In 11 patients (21 eyes) a depression of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) was recorded. We found a statistically significant decrease of the RNFL over time in reference to the normative database in the superior temporal (p = 0.015), temporal (p = 0.026) and nasal segments (p = 0.011). After separation of superficial and buried drusen the same significant change was found in nasal segment in superficial drusen (p = 0,031). We found no statistically significant difference over time between superficial and buried drusen (p = 0.109-0.999 for individual segments).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> ODD are common and visual functions remain stable. Their presence can be confirmed using modern paraclinical methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":39839,"journal":{"name":"Ceska a Slovenska Oftalmologie","volume":"80 6","pages":"324-330"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ceska a Slovenska Oftalmologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31348/2024/39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose:  To analyze patients with optic disc drusen (ODD), with emphasis on modern diagnostics.

Materials and methods:  Research of the literature was conducted, together with a retrospective statistical analysis of patients with ODD. The group included individuals with ODD diagnosed using at least one of the following (ultrasound - USG, optical coherence tomography - OCT, fundus autofluorescence - FAF).

Results:  The group consisted of 12 patients (23 eyes), 7 women and 5 men. The mean age was 25 years. The mean observation period was 73 months. In total, 11 patients (22 eyes) had a bilateral finding and 1 patient (1 eye) had a unilateral finding. The mean age was 25 years. Buried drusen were confirmed in 69.6% of cases (8 patients, 16 eyes), superficial drusen were confirmed in 30.4% of cases (4 patients, 7 eyes). Mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and mean intraocular pressure were stable over time (BCVA p = 0.236, IOP p = 0.855). The aforementioned diagnostic methods proved to be equally effective (p = 0.768). In 11 patients (21 eyes) a depression of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) was recorded. We found a statistically significant decrease of the RNFL over time in reference to the normative database in the superior temporal (p = 0.015), temporal (p = 0.026) and nasal segments (p = 0.011). After separation of superficial and buried drusen the same significant change was found in nasal segment in superficial drusen (p = 0,031). We found no statistically significant difference over time between superficial and buried drusen (p = 0.109-0.999 for individual segments).

Conclusion:  ODD are common and visual functions remain stable. Their presence can be confirmed using modern paraclinical methods.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ceska a Slovenska Oftalmologie
Ceska a Slovenska Oftalmologie Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: - Redakce přijímá pouze práce vyhovující po odborné stránce, které jsou na odpovídající profesionální a formální úrovni. - Uveřejněná práce se stává majetkem časopisu, přetisknout její část nebo obrázek lze jen s citací původu. - Rukopis zasílejte v originále a dobře čitelné kopii (je nutná také kopie tabulek, legend, podle možnosti i obrázků). - Listy číslujte v pravém horním rohu a spojujte svorkou, nesešívejte. Přijímáme práce psané na jedné straně kvalitního bílého nelesklého papíru formátu A4 (neprůklepový) na psacím stroji nebo počítači s obvyklými typy.
期刊最新文献
ULTRASOUND EXAMINATION OF THE ORBIT IN PATIENTS WITH THYROIDASSOCIATED ORBITOPATHY - EXAMINATION GUIDE AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EVERYDAY PRACTICE. A REVIEW. Diagnostic Importance of OCT Pachymetry in Keratoconus. Improvement of Visual Field Defects after Neuroembolization Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms. Case Reports. Pars Plana Vitrectomy in the Treatment of Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment. Refractive Errors Among Members of the Armed Forces of the Czech Republic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1