Workforce Psychological Distress and Absenteeism in Australia: The Correlates of Industry, Age, and Gender.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2024-12-21 DOI:10.1177/10105395241306477
Kristy Burns, Louise A Ellis, Abilio De Almeida Neto, Janaki Amin
{"title":"Workforce Psychological Distress and Absenteeism in Australia: The Correlates of Industry, Age, and Gender.","authors":"Kristy Burns, Louise A Ellis, Abilio De Almeida Neto, Janaki Amin","doi":"10.1177/10105395241306477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The workplace is an important setting for improving population psychological health. This study aimed to identify priority industries and populations in Australia with highest adverse effects of psychological distress. The study included 5834 workers aged 18 to 64 years who participated in the 2020 to 2021 National Health Survey. Logistic regression analyses were used to estimate the prevalence of psychological distress by industry, age group, and gender. Productivity losses were analyzed using negative binomial regression. Increased odds of experiencing distress were found for younger workers 18 to 29 years (odds ratio [OR] = 2. 45, 95% CI [1.75, 3.43]) and female workers (OR = 1.52, 95% CI [1.16, 2.01]). Industry of employment did not impact distress once age and gender were accounted for (<i>P</i> = .956). Being highly/very highly distressed resulted in a mean of 21.56 more distress-related loss days per year (0.78 vs 22.34) compared with low/moderate distress. Targeted and tailored workplace intervention programs for these groups are required to build a healthy and productive future workforce.</p>","PeriodicalId":55570,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":"10105395241306477"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10105395241306477","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The workplace is an important setting for improving population psychological health. This study aimed to identify priority industries and populations in Australia with highest adverse effects of psychological distress. The study included 5834 workers aged 18 to 64 years who participated in the 2020 to 2021 National Health Survey. Logistic regression analyses were used to estimate the prevalence of psychological distress by industry, age group, and gender. Productivity losses were analyzed using negative binomial regression. Increased odds of experiencing distress were found for younger workers 18 to 29 years (odds ratio [OR] = 2. 45, 95% CI [1.75, 3.43]) and female workers (OR = 1.52, 95% CI [1.16, 2.01]). Industry of employment did not impact distress once age and gender were accounted for (P = .956). Being highly/very highly distressed resulted in a mean of 21.56 more distress-related loss days per year (0.78 vs 22.34) compared with low/moderate distress. Targeted and tailored workplace intervention programs for these groups are required to build a healthy and productive future workforce.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚劳动力心理困扰与旷工:行业、年龄和性别的相关性。
工作场所是提高人群心理健康水平的重要场所。本研究旨在确定澳大利亚心理困扰最严重的优先行业和人群。该研究包括参加2020年至2021年全国健康调查的5834名18至64岁的工人。采用Logistic回归分析估计不同行业、年龄组和性别的心理困扰患病率。生产率损失采用负二项回归分析。18至29岁的年轻员工经历痛苦的几率增加(比值比[OR] = 2)。45, 95% CI[1.75, 3.43])和女工(OR = 1.52, 95% CI[1.16, 2.01])。一旦考虑到年龄和性别,就业行业对痛苦没有影响(P = .956)。与低/中度痛苦相比,高度/非常高度痛苦导致每年与痛苦相关的损失天数平均增加21.56天(0.78 vs 22.34)。需要为这些群体制定有针对性和量身定制的工作场所干预方案,以建立健康和富有成效的未来劳动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health
Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
147
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health (APJPH) is a peer-reviewed, bimonthly journal that focuses on health issues in the Asia-Pacific Region. APJPH publishes original articles on public health related issues, including implications for practical applications to professional education and services for public health and primary health care that are of concern and relevance to the Asia-Pacific region.
期刊最新文献
Association Between the Community Gatherings Places and the Kihon Checklist Score: JAGES Longitudinal Study. Child Amputees in Gaza: A Humanitarian Crisis Demanding Action. Association Between Body Mass Index and Depression, Anxiety, and Suicidality in University Students From Seven Regions of China: A Cross-Sectional Study. Trends in the Prevalence of Korean Adolescent Smokers According to Smoking Cessation Policy and COVID-19. How has COVID-19 Impacted Community Mental Health Clinicians and the Delivery of Care in Australia: Short Communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1