COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among caregivers of children under five years old in a pediatric emergency department.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Public Health Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2024.12.015
Lauren Van Woy, Tamara Casas, Ashish Shah, Elizabeth Chang
{"title":"COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among caregivers of children under five years old in a pediatric emergency department.","authors":"Lauren Van Woy, Tamara Casas, Ashish Shah, Elizabeth Chang","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2024.12.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Children under five years old have a high rate of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection, yet rates of vaccination are relatively low. Our qualitative study investigated reasons why caregivers of children ages six months to four years old may be hesitant to vaccinate their children against COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Qualitative study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled a convenience sample of caregivers of patients aged six months to four years who presented for care at a pediatric Emergency Department in southern California. We conducted face-to-face semi-structured interviews with caregivers to probe for themes regarding any hesitations they may have regarding vaccinating their children against COVID-19. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, translated if necessary, and coded. When thematic saturation was achieved, we applied grounded theory methodology to assess for themes and adapted the World Health Organization Strategic Advisory Group of Experts model of vaccine hesitancy determinants matrix to provide a framework for the identified themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We conducted 20 interviews, two in Spanish, and achieved thematic saturation at 17 interviews. We categorized themes surrounding vaccine hesitancies into external, patient-centric, and vaccine-centric factors. External factors included sources of information and family/community influence. Patient-centric factors included the perceived risk versus benefit ratio, caregiver beliefs, and caregiver knowledge and awareness. Vaccine-centric factors included vaccine safety, vaccine efficacy, vaccine information, and barriers to vaccination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using qualitative methodology, we gained important insights into caregiver thoughts regarding the COVID-19 vaccine in children under five years old. We identified themes not previously published in the literature that may be specific to the COVID-19 vaccine in the young pediatric population.</p>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"238 ","pages":"266-273"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2024.12.015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Children under five years old have a high rate of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection, yet rates of vaccination are relatively low. Our qualitative study investigated reasons why caregivers of children ages six months to four years old may be hesitant to vaccinate their children against COVID-19.

Study design: Qualitative study.

Methods: We enrolled a convenience sample of caregivers of patients aged six months to four years who presented for care at a pediatric Emergency Department in southern California. We conducted face-to-face semi-structured interviews with caregivers to probe for themes regarding any hesitations they may have regarding vaccinating their children against COVID-19. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, translated if necessary, and coded. When thematic saturation was achieved, we applied grounded theory methodology to assess for themes and adapted the World Health Organization Strategic Advisory Group of Experts model of vaccine hesitancy determinants matrix to provide a framework for the identified themes.

Results: We conducted 20 interviews, two in Spanish, and achieved thematic saturation at 17 interviews. We categorized themes surrounding vaccine hesitancies into external, patient-centric, and vaccine-centric factors. External factors included sources of information and family/community influence. Patient-centric factors included the perceived risk versus benefit ratio, caregiver beliefs, and caregiver knowledge and awareness. Vaccine-centric factors included vaccine safety, vaccine efficacy, vaccine information, and barriers to vaccination.

Conclusions: Using qualitative methodology, we gained important insights into caregiver thoughts regarding the COVID-19 vaccine in children under five years old. We identified themes not previously published in the literature that may be specific to the COVID-19 vaccine in the young pediatric population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科急诊科5岁以下儿童护理人员对COVID-19疫苗的犹豫
目的:5岁以下儿童SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19)感染率较高,但疫苗接种率较低。我们的定性研究调查了6个月至4岁儿童的照顾者可能不愿为孩子接种COVID-19疫苗的原因。研究设计:定性研究。方法:我们招募了在南加州儿科急诊科就诊的6个月至4岁患者的护理人员作为方便样本。我们对护理人员进行了面对面的半结构化访谈,以探讨他们在为孩子接种COVID-19疫苗方面可能存在的任何犹豫。采访被记录下来,转录,必要时翻译,并编码。当主题达到饱和时,我们应用扎根理论方法来评估主题,并改编世界卫生组织战略咨询专家组疫苗犹豫决定因素矩阵模型,为确定的主题提供框架。结果:我们进行了20次访谈,其中两次是西班牙语访谈,并在17次访谈中达到主题饱和。我们将围绕疫苗犹豫的主题分为外部因素、以患者为中心因素和以疫苗为中心因素。外部因素包括信息来源和家庭/社区影响。以患者为中心的因素包括感知风险与收益比、护理人员信念、护理人员知识和意识。以疫苗为中心的因素包括疫苗安全性、疫苗效力、疫苗信息和接种障碍。结论:采用定性方法,我们获得了护理人员对5岁以下儿童接种COVID-19疫苗的想法的重要见解。我们确定了以前未在文献中发表的主题,这些主题可能是针对年轻儿科人群的COVID-19疫苗的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
期刊最新文献
Appraisal of World Health Organization guidelines for priority infectious diseases with potential to cause public health emergencies. Racial/ethnic inequities in potentially harmful supplement use: Results of a prospective US cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic. Association between diabetes prevalence and weekend warrior activity patterns. Prevalence and determinants of low birth weight in Ethiopia: A multilevel meta-analysis and systematic review. Healthy ageing - Investing now for the future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1