Comparison of clinical outcomes between remodified Hanley procedure and modified Hanley procedure for high complex horseshoe fistula: a retrospective study.
{"title":"Comparison of clinical outcomes between remodified Hanley procedure and modified Hanley procedure for high complex horseshoe fistula: a retrospective study.","authors":"W Wang, W Cui, J Lu, M Yang, T Peng, J Yu","doi":"10.1007/s10151-024-03072-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treating high horseshoe anal fistula (HHAF) with the modified Halley procedure (MHP) often falls short when focusing solely on deep postanal space (DPAS) drainage. Our study underscores the significance of addressing deep posterior intersphincteric space (DPIS) drainage, prompting MHP modifications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied consecutive patients with HHAF treated with either MHP or remodified-MHP (Re-MHP) at Ningbo Medical Center of Lihuili Hospital from January 2018 to December 2021. Postoperative outcomes, encompassing complications, cure rates, pain, anal incontinence, and quality of life, were retrospectively assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cure rates for MHP and Re-MHP were 95.3% (41/43) and 82.1% (32/39), respectively, without statistical significance (χ<sup>2</sup> = 3.7, P = 0.08). VAS-PS, CCF-IS, and QLAF-QS scores significantly increased postsurgery and gradually decreased. Notably, Re-MHP demonstrated significantly lower VAS-PS scores during the first postoperative week, lower QLAF-QS scores on the seventh day, and more drainage secretions on the first day (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Simultaneously enhancing DPAS and DPIS drainage in Re-MHP can enhance the cure rates of HHAF patients while preserving minimally invasive attributes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"29 1","pages":"33"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-024-03072-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Treating high horseshoe anal fistula (HHAF) with the modified Halley procedure (MHP) often falls short when focusing solely on deep postanal space (DPAS) drainage. Our study underscores the significance of addressing deep posterior intersphincteric space (DPIS) drainage, prompting MHP modifications.
Methods: We studied consecutive patients with HHAF treated with either MHP or remodified-MHP (Re-MHP) at Ningbo Medical Center of Lihuili Hospital from January 2018 to December 2021. Postoperative outcomes, encompassing complications, cure rates, pain, anal incontinence, and quality of life, were retrospectively assessed.
Results: Cure rates for MHP and Re-MHP were 95.3% (41/43) and 82.1% (32/39), respectively, without statistical significance (χ2 = 3.7, P = 0.08). VAS-PS, CCF-IS, and QLAF-QS scores significantly increased postsurgery and gradually decreased. Notably, Re-MHP demonstrated significantly lower VAS-PS scores during the first postoperative week, lower QLAF-QS scores on the seventh day, and more drainage secretions on the first day (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: Simultaneously enhancing DPAS and DPIS drainage in Re-MHP can enhance the cure rates of HHAF patients while preserving minimally invasive attributes.
期刊介绍：
Techniques in Coloproctology is an international journal fully devoted to diagnostic and operative procedures carried out in the management of colorectal diseases. Imaging, clinical physiology, laparoscopy, open abdominal surgery and proctoperineology are the main topics covered by the journal. Reviews, original articles, technical notes and short communications with many detailed illustrations render this publication indispensable for coloproctologists and related specialists. Both surgeons and gastroenterologists are represented on the distinguished Editorial Board, together with pathologists, radiologists and basic scientists from all over the world. The journal is strongly recommended to those who wish to be updated on recent developments in the field, and improve the standards of their work.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1965 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted. Reports of animal experiments must state that the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care (NIH publication no. 86-23 revised 1985) were followed as were applicable national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals). The Editor-in-Chief reserves the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. Authors will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill such requirements.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
